fy12 doe csp program update to industry september 2012
play

FY12 DOE CSP Program Update to Industry September 2012 Outline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FY12 DOE CSP Program Update to Industry September 2012 Outline SunShot Goals FY12 Funding Opportunities and Outcomes Competitive Funding of the DOE National Laboratories Summary Q&A 2 SunShot CSP Goal The DOE SunShot


  1. FY12 DOE CSP Program Update to Industry September 2012

  2. Outline  SunShot Goals  FY12 Funding Opportunities and Outcomes  Competitive Funding of the DOE National Laboratories  Summary  Q&A 2

  3. SunShot CSP Goal The DOE SunShot Initiative is a collaborative national endeavor to make solar energy cost competitive with other forms of energy, without subsidies, by the end of the decade. $0.21 $0.21 $0.07 $0.07 $0.05 $0.05 $0.02 $0.02 $0.03 $0.03 $0.02 $0.02 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 6¢/kWh 6¢/kWh $0.01 $0.01 $0.09 $0.09 $0.01 $0.01 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 Power SunShot 2010 Solar Receiver/Heat Thermal Plant Target (2020) Field Transfer Storage Cost Reductions

  4. DOE CSP SunShot Strategy

  5. SunShot CSP FOA Selections Goal: To innovate and develop next-generation CSP technologies for low-  cost collectors, high-temperature receivers and high-efficiency dry- cooled power cycles to meet the aggressive technical targets of SunShot. Investment: Up to $55 million over 3 years in 21 projects at companies,  universities and national laboratories. Collectors Receivers Power Cycles

  6. MURI FOA Selections  Goal: To develop high operating temperature heat transfer fluids for CSP applications through fundamental materials discovery and demonstration. Investment: Up to $10 million over 5 years in 2 projects at universities.   Over 40 different universities competed as 11 teams, of which two teams were selected… Liquid Metals Molten Salts

  7. National Laboratories Funding So Far… < FY11 FY12 Funding focused on SNL and NREL only Funding focused on SNL and NREL only Based on pre-allocated $8.5M annual budget to Funding was based on technical review. each lab. The AOPs were little reviewed for technical The AOPs were rigorously reviewed by DOE HQ content for technical content. Labs revised AOPs a few times to address review comments. Less emphasis on intellectual outcomes such as Greater emphasis on intellectual outcomes such patents, licenses, or journal publications as patents, licenses, and journal publications as part of the statement of work. FY12 was a transition to the new process

  8. National Laboratories Funding (FY13+) Goal: T o leverage the expertise within the US DOE national laboratory system to develop innovative CSP components, systems, and analysis capabilities. Open competition to ALL DOE National Laboratories with the technical targets of • the SunShot goal. 44 Full proposals came from NREL, SNL, ORNL, SRNL, PNNL, and LANL. Proposals were more descriptive with a 3-year plan and yearly outcomes and • deliverables toward the 3-year objective. Proposals were peer-reviewed by an external panel of distinguished researchers • from industry, non-DOE national labs and academia, including NAE members. Industry reps from SolarReserve, BrightSource Energy, SENER, Rolls Royce and Bechtel. – Abengoa was invited to participate but never responded to the invitation. Peer-review consisted of a merit review panel discussion as well as evaluation of • oral presentations on a short listed subset of 23 proposals by an external peer- review panel. The PIs were able to rebut the reviewer comments directly with the reviewers. Core facilities at Sandia and NREL were evaluated by the external peer-review • committee in the oral presentations. Funding decisions on technical activities were based on their intellectual merit. •

  9. CSP Lab Call Selections Investment: 12 projects at national laboratories.   This is additional investment in the national laboratories on top of their awards through the competitive FOAs  Takeaway : Lab funding is broad based, with technologies applicable to Dish, Trough and Tower Systems and spanning near-term to long-term research. 4 Projects 3 Projects 1 Project Each 2 Projects

  10. FY13–15 Laboratory Funded Projects Prime Title Topic Description of Research Lab High-Temperature Solar Selective Coating SNL and NREL will be teaming to research solar selective coatings that SNL Receivers Development for Power Tower Receivers are stable in air to temperatures in excess of 650°C NREL will be partnering with an industry member to look at direct Direct s-CO2 Receiver Development NREL Receivers supercritical CO 2 configurations. Fundamental Corrosion Studies in High- Temperature Molten Salt Systems for Next SRNL will partner with universities and industry to perform corrosion SRNL TES Generation Concentrated Solar Power tests on a wide variety of alloys at temperatures up to 800°C. Systems SNL, with some materials help from NREL, will be building a prototype Dish Stirling High Performance Thermal SNL TES latent heat dish storage system capable of greater than 6 hours of Storage storage. Low-Cost Metal Hydride SRNL will be prototyping a metal hydride storage system for CSP Thermal Energy Storage System for SRNL TES applications. Concentrating Solar Power Systems NREL, with some help from universities and Sandia, will be investigating Degradation Mechanisms and Development high temperature salt corrosion on various alloys and begin developing of Protective Coatings for TES and HTF NREL TES mitigation methods via surface passivation and coatings. Corrosion of Containment Materials supercritical CO2 will also be investigated over a variety of alloys and impurities. High Efficiency Thermal Energy Storage ANL, along with a private non-profit laboratory, will be prototyping a ANL TES System for CSP latent heat storage system using graphite foams. Low-Cost Heliostat for Modular Systems NREL Collectors NREL will be designing and prototyping a new heliostat. ORNL will be determining the optical properties of their anti-soiling Low-cost self-cleaning reflector coatings for ORNL Collectors coatings for mirrors and will demonstrate the coatings in outdoor concentrating solar power collectors settings. High Temperature Thermal Array for Next Power CyclesLANL will be investigating the use of extremely long (>300ft) heat pipes LANL Generation Solar Thermal Power Production in place of traditional heat transfer fluids. Core Facilities at the DOE National Solar Core SNL This is funding to maintain and operate the NSTTF at SNL Thermal Test Facility Facilities Core This is funding to improve and incorporate new capabilities into NREL's SAM Enhancements for CSP NREL 10 Facilities SAM.

  11. Current CSP Program Portfolio FOA Initial and Continuing Awards Objective CSP R&D 12 Industry Awards; 4 Continuing in FY12 – on Re-energize the US CSP Dish, Trough and T ower Systems Industry Thermal Storage 15 Initial Awards; 6 Continuing in FY12 – on Generate CSP TES Dish, Trough and T ower Systems approaches ARRA Lab Awards 8 National Labs + 1 Industry; 5 Continuing in FY12 ($18M to SNL, $5.4M to NREL) Investment in National Lab CSP Baseload 12 Industry Awards + 1 University; 9 infrastructure Continuing in FY12 (Trough and T owers) LCOE: < 8-9¢/kWh CSP SunShot 21 Awards (including 7 National Labs and 5 Industries) – Dish, Trough & T ower Systems Technical targets towards MURI HOT Fluids 2 University T eams SunShot goal of 6¢/kWh Development of High National Lab Funding 12 Awards to 6 DOE National Laboratories – Temperature HTF Dish, Trough and T ower Systems Support Near-, Mid-, and Long-term R&D at the Labs

  12. NREL & SNL Funding FY11 – FY15 FY11 – Covered by each ARRA facilities installation FOA’s awards made prior to NREL & SNL Funding by FY $12,000 subprogram individually support covered through FY11 will still be supported on a FY12 and Beyond – Covered by completion with FY12 funds. request and DOE approval Program Management, $128 SETP wide agreement basis. $10,000 Communications, and Tasks Funded by Other Subprograms $1,225 FOA/Uncompeted Industry $1,260 $8,000 $25 Funds (in 000's) Support $5,439 $100 $1,250 $98 $2,250 $172 $353 $204 $55 $6,000 Subcontracts $755 $100 $698 $1,625 $216$1,879 $2,853 $609 $1,000 $1,750$1,340 $2,000 $611 $196 $4,000 $500 Facilities O&M, Facilities Install, $604 Code Upgrades, and Standards $4,633 $3,909 $4,937 $750 Participation $4,325 $2,000 $3,490 $3,484 $3,736 $4,405 R&D $3,916 $2,379 $0 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 NREL SNL Details on the calculations behind these budgetary breakdowns can be discussed further 12 upon request.

  13. T otal CSP Lab Funding FY11 – FY15 Total Lab Funding $25,000 FY11 ‐ FY15 $667 $1,905 $20,000 LANL $2,108 Funds (in 000's) $667 PNNL $667 $1,534 $1,400 $1,189 $200 $1,145 SRNL $15,000 $2,110 $2,097 $76 $1,270 $580 $3,929 ANL $1,058 $7,575 ORNL $5,204 $10,000 $7,015 $4,360 SNL NREL $10,200 $5,000 $7,491 $6,867 $6,488 $5,565 $ ‐ FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 This chart reflects all CSP program support to the national laboratories, minus any program management, communications, and tasks that have been moved to other DOE programs. 13

Recommend


More recommend