full year results introduction
play

Full Year Results Introduction Sir John Parker Chairman 20 May - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Full Year Results Introduction Sir John Parker Chairman 20 May 2010 Cautionary Statement This presentation contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements are forward-


  1. Full Year Results Introduction Sir John Parker Chairman 20 May 2010

  2. Cautionary Statement This presentation contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements are forward- looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include information with respect to National Grid’s financial condition, its results of operations and businesses, strategy, plans and objectives. Words such as ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘targets’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘continue’, ‘project’ and similar expressions, as well as statements in the future tense, identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of National Grid’s future performance and are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond National Grid’s ability to control or estimate precisely, such as such as changes in laws or regulations and decisions by governmental bodies or regulators; breaches of, or changes in, environmental, climate change and health and safety laws or regulations; network failure or interruption, the inability to carry out critical non-network operations and damage to infrastructure; performance against regulatory targets and standards, including delivery of costs and efficiency savings; customers and counterparties failing to perform their obligations to National Grid; and unseasonable weather affecting energy demands. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in this presentation include fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, commodity price indices and settlement of hedging arrangements; restrictions in National Grid’s borrowing and debt arrangements; changes to credit ratings of National Grid and its subsidiaries; adverse changes and volatility in the global credit markets; National Grid’s ability to access capital markets and other sources of credit in a timely manner and other sources of credit on acceptable terms; deflation or inflation; the seasonality of National Grid’s businesses; the future funding requirements of National Grid’s pension schemes and other post-retirement benefit schemes, and the regulatory treatment of pension costs; the loss of key personnel or the inability to attract, train or retain qualified personnel; new or revised accounting standards, rules and interpretations, including changes of law and accounting standards that may affect National Grid’s effective rate of tax; incorrect assumptions or conclusions underpinning business development activity, and any unforeseen significant liabilities or other unanticipated or unintended effects of such activities and the performance of National Grid’s subsidiaries. In addition National Grid’s reputation may be harmed if consumers of energy suffer a disruption to their supply. For a more detailed description of some of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, together with any other risk factors, please see National Grid’s filings with and submissions to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) (and in particular the Risk Factors and Operating and Financial Review sections in its most recent Annual Report on Form 20-F). The effects of these factors are difficult to predict. New factors emerge from time to time and National Grid cannot assess the potential impact of any such factor on its activities or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause its results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Except as may be required by law or regulation, National Grid undertakes no obligation to update any of its forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation.

  3. Full Year Results Headlines Steve Holliday Chief Executive

  4. Financial performance Operating profit Up 7% Profit before tax Up 12% Earnings per share Up 14% Dividend per share * Up 8% * Recommended by the Board All business performance figures exclude exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries and are for continuing operations

  5. Operational performance Safety � 40% improvement in Injury Frequency Rate Reliability � All UK & US regulatory targets met for the first time Customer satisfaction � Some work to do to improve against peers

  6. Delivered priorities for 2009/10 Regulation 65% of US rate base updated (a) Driving efficiency 7.6% 2009/10 efficiency metric (b) Disciplined investment £3.3bn delivered in 2009/10, 99% remunerated (c) (a) 35% of US rate base is currently pending decisions on new rate plans (b) Regulated controllable costs divided by asset base (c) Capital investment for continuing operations, excluding Joint Ventures

  7. Funding UK growth strategy Group capital expenditure � Maintain single A credit c.£22 billion ratings in next 5 years � Proven delivery track record Fully underwritten rights issue £3.2 billion gross proceeds £3.3bn

  8. Full Year Results Steve Lucas Finance Director

  9. Financial results Strong results � Operating profit up 7% � Effective interest down to 4.6%* � EPS up 14% � Dividend up 8% Well positioned for 2010/11 * Interest rate on treasury managed debt � Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations

  10. Transmission Operating profit Transmission operating profit 13% up 47% at constant currency share of group £35m £142m £23m £(33)m £1,464m £1,297m 2009 Net regulated UK incentive Controllable Other, mainly 2010 income schemes costs French Interconnector Operating profit at constant currency � Visual representation only – not to scale � Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations � Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2010 rate ($1.58 to £1.00) to 2009 results (when the average rate was $1.54 to £1.00)

  11. Gas Distribution Operating profit Gas Distribution operating profit 10% down 36% at constant currency share of group £65m £(177)m £(19)m £1,268m £1,137m 2009 UK net regulated US net regulated Other 2010 income income of which £115m is timing Operating profit at constant currency � Visual representation only – not to scale � Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations � Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2010 rate ($1.58 to £1.00) to 2009 results (when the average rate was $1.54 to £1.00)

  12. Electricity Distribution and Generation Operating profit E, D & G operating profit 45% up 12% at constant currency share of group £35m £1m £80m £374m £258m 2009 Net regulated income Lower storm costs Other 2010 Operating profit at constant currency � Visual representation only – not to scale � Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations � Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2010 rate ($1.58 to £1.00) to 2009 results (when the average rate was $1.54 to £1.00)

  13. Non-regulated and other Operating profit Non-reg. & other operating profit 125% up 5% at constant currency share of group £17m £5m £30m £29m £146m £65m 2009 Metering Grain LNG Property Other 2010 Operating profit at constant currency � Visual representation only – not to scale � Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations � Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2010 rate ($1.58 to £1.00) to 2009 results (when the average rate was $1.54 to £1.00)

  14. Cost savings and efficiency metric 2009/10 efficiency metric (b) 7.6% � Real controllable costs (a) reduced by 2% 40bps improvement* � KeySpan synergy savings on track at $159 million £181m � Annualised procurement savings in £143m excess of £160 million £2,110m £2,070m 2008/09 2009/10 Real controllable costs Bad debts * 2008/09 restated from 8.1% for currency impact, cost reclassifications and Massachusetts gas goodwill adjustment (a) Regulated controllable costs excluding bad debts on a constant currency basis and adjusted for RPI. Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2010 rate ($1.58 to £1.00) to 2009 results (when the average rate was $1.54 to £1.00) (b) Adjusted controllable costs (a) divided by asset base. Asset base: mid-year UK regulatory asset value plus US rate base at constant currency.

  15. Earnings, return on equity and dividend Earnings per share � Strong underlying growth 14% up � Effective interest rate* 4.6% on prior year Group return on equity 11.3% � 15% annual return on equity 3-year average Dividend per share � Full year dividend of 38.49p 8% up � Dividend cover up, at 1.5 times in line with policy *Treasury managed effective interest rate � Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations

Recommend


More recommend