from geometry to invertibility preservers
play

From geometry to invertibility preservers Joint work with Peter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

From geometry to invertibility preservers Joint work with Peter Semrl Dept. of Mathematics, University of Ljubljana Vorau, June 6th, 2007 H ANS H AVLICEK F ORSCHUNGSGRUPPE D IFFERENTIALGEOMETRIE UND G EOMETRISCHE S TRUKTUREN I NSTITUT F


  1. From geometry to invertibility preservers Joint work with Peter ˇ Semrl Dept. of Mathematics, University of Ljubljana Vorau, June 6th, 2007 H ANS H AVLICEK F ORSCHUNGSGRUPPE D IFFERENTIALGEOMETRIE UND G EOMETRISCHE S TRUKTUREN I NSTITUT F ¨ UR D ISKRETE M ATHEMATIK UND G EOMETRIE T ECHNISCHE U NIVERSIT ¨ D IFFERENTIALGEOMETRIE UND AT W IEN G EOMETRISCHE S TRUKTUREN havlicek@geometrie.tuwien.ac.at

  2. Geometry of Matrices Let M m,n , m, n ≥ 2 , be the vector space of all m × n matrices over a field F . Two matrices (linear operators) A and B are adjacent if A − B is of rank one. We may consider M m,n as an undirected graph the edges of which are precisely the (unordered) pairs of adjacent matrices. Two matrices A and B are at the graph-theoretical distance k ≥ 0 if, and only if rank( A − B ) = k. On the other hand we may consider M m,n as an affine space. Its lines fall into min { m, n } classes, according to the rank of a “direction vector”.

  3. Hua’s Theorem Fundamental Theorem (1951). Every bijective map ϕ : M m,n → M m,n : A �→ ϕ ( A ) preserving adjacency in both directions is of the form A �→ TA σ S + R, where T is an invertible m × m matrix, S is an invertible n × n matrix, R is an m × n matrix, and σ is an automorphism of the underlying field. If m = n , then we have the additional possibility that A �→ TA t σ S + R where T, S, R and σ are as above, and A t denotes the transpose of A . The assumptions in Hua’s fundamental theorem can be weakened. W.-l. Huang and Z.-X. Wan: Beitr¨ age Algebra Geom. 45 (2004), no. 2, 435–446.

  4. Grassmann Spaces Let m, n be integers ≥ 2 . We consider the Grassmannian G m + n,m whose elements are vector subspaces of F m + n of dimension m . Alternatively, the point of view of projective geometry may be adopted. Two m -dimensional subspaces U and V are adjacent if dim( U + V ) = m + 1 . As before, we obtain a graph known as the Grassmann graph of G m + n,m . Two subspaces U and V are at graph-theoretical distance k if, and only if, dim( U + V ) = m + k, whence k ≤ min { m, n } . On the other hand, we may consider G m + n,m as the “point set” of a Grassmann space . Its “lines” are the pencils of k -subspaces.

  5. Chow’s Theorem Chow’s Theorem (1949). Every bijective map ϕ : G m + n,n → G m + n,n : U �→ ϕ ( U ) preserving adjacency in both directions is induced by a semilinear mapping f : F m + n → F m + n : x �→ Lx σ such that ϕ ( U ) = f ( U ) , where L is an invertible ( m + n ) × ( m + n ) matrix, and σ is an automorphism of the underlying field. If m = n we have the additional possibility that ϕ is induced by a sesquilinear form g : F m + n × F m + n → F : ( x, y ) �→ x t σ Ly such that U ⊥ g ϕ ( U ) , where L and σ are as above. The assumptions in Chow’s theorem can be weakened. W.-l. Huang: Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 68 (1998), 65–77.

  6. Coordinates To each m -dimensional subspace U of F m + n we can associate an m × ( m + n ) matrix whose rows form a basis of U . This matrix can be written in block form as [ X Y ] where X, Y are of size m × n and m × m , respectively. Two matrices [ X Y ] and [ X ′ Y ′ ] , each with rank m , are associated to the same U if, and only if, [ X Y ] = P [ X ′ Y ′ ] for some invertible m × m matrix P . This gives “homogeneous coordinates” for the Grassmann space. For m = n we obtain the projective line over the ring of m × m matrices.

  7. Connection Let U be a point of the Grassmann space and [ X Y ] an associated matrix: • U is at infinity if Y is not invertible. • U is a finite point otherwise. Hence it can be written uniquely in the form [ A I ] , where A is an m × n matrix and I is the identity matrix. The mapping U �→ A is a bijection from the set of finite points of the Grassmann space G m + n,n onto the space M m,n ; adjacency is preserved in both directions. Alternative point of view: Stereographic projection of a Grassmann variety (folklore). Cf. also: R. Metz: Geom. Dedicata 10 (1981), no. 1-4, 337–367.

  8. Full Rank Differences Let F be a field with at least three elements and m, n integers with m ≥ n ≥ 2 . Given A, B ∈ M m,n we write A △ B if A − B is of full rank (i.e., the rank equals n ). For two finite points U, V of the Grassmann space F m + n the sum U + V is direct (i. e. they meet at 0 only) if, and only if, their associated matrices A, B satisfy A △ B.

  9. Full Rank Preservers Theorem 1. Assume that ϕ : M m,n → M m,n is a bijective map such that for every pair A, B ∈ M m,n we have A △ B ⇔ ϕ ( A ) △ ϕ ( B ) . Then adjacency is preserved under ϕ in both directions. Consequently, Hua’s theorem can be applied and all such mappings can be de- scribed explicitly as before. Cf. A. Blunck, H. H.: Discrete Math. 301 (2005), no. 1, 46–56.

  10. Sketch of the Proof Proposition. Let A, B ∈ M m,n be matrices with A � = B . Then the following are equivalent: 1. A and B are adjacent. 2. There exists C ∈ M m,n , C � = A, B , such that for every X ∈ M m,n the relation X △ C yields X △ A or X △ B . Geometric idea behind the proof ( m = n = 2) : X A C B

  11. Hilbert Spaces Let H be an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space and B ( H ) the algebra of all bounded linear operators on H . Given A, B ∈ B ( H ) we write A △ B if A − B is invertible. Then it is possible to characterise all invertibility preservers , i. e., all bijective map- pings ϕ : B ( H ) → B ( H ) with the following property: For every pair A, B ∈ B ( H ) we have A − B is invertible ⇔ ϕ ( A ) − ϕ ( B ) is invertible.

  12. Invertibility Preservers Theorem 2. Let H be an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space and B ( H ) the algebra of all bounded linear operators on H . Assume that ϕ : B ( H ) → B ( H ) is an invertibility preserver. Then there exist R ∈ B ( H ) and invertible T, S ∈ B ( H ) such that either ϕ ( A ) = TAS + R for every A ∈ B ( H ) , or ϕ ( A ) = TA t S + R for every A ∈ B ( H ) , or ϕ ( A ) = TA ∗ S + R for every A ∈ B ( H ) , or ϕ ( A ) = T ( A t ) ∗ S + R for every A ∈ B ( H ) . Here, A t and A ∗ denote the transpose with respect to an arbitrary but fixed orthonor- mal basis, and the usual adjoint of A in the Hilbert space sense, respectively.

Recommend


More recommend