fractal structures in functions related to number theory
play

Fractal Structures in Functions Related to Number Theory Je ff - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fractal Structures in Functions Related to Number Theory Je ff Lagarias University of Michigan January 4, 2012 Credits Work of J. L. reported in this talk was partially supported by NSF grants DMS-0801029 and DMS-1101373. 1 Benoit B.


  1. Fractal Structures in Functions Related to Number Theory Je ff Lagarias University of Michigan January 4, 2012

  2. Credits • Work of J. L. reported in this talk was partially supported by NSF grants DMS-0801029 and DMS-1101373. 1

  3. Benoit B. Mandelbrot (1924–2010) • “If we talk about impact inside mathematics, and applications to the sciences, he is one of the most important figures of the last 50 years.” -Hans-Otto Peitgen. • He brought background into foreground, made exceptions into the rule. His work reorganized how people see things. • Example. Note in the following photograph a possible fractal structure in the hair (apr` es A. Einstein). 2

  4. 3 Benoit Mandelbrot

  5. Some Important Themes: • Structures having self-similar and self-a ffi ne substructures. • Structures produced by multiplicative product processes on trees; canonical cascade measures, a model for turbulence (“multifractal products”), generalizing a model of Yaglom (1966). • Measures of fractal behavior on di ff erent scales: the multi-fractal formalism 4

  6. A Typical Paper B. B. Mandelbot, Negative Fractal Dimensions and Multifractals, Physica A 163 (1990), 306–315. • Abstract: “A new notion of fractal dimension is defined. When it is positive, it e ff ectively falls back on known definitions. But its motivating virtue is that it can take negative values, which measure usefully the degree of emptiness of empty sets.” • Citation list: 21 references, of which 10 are to the author’s previous papers and talks. Self-citation dimension: 10 / 21 = 0 . 47619 (an empirical estimate). 5

  7. Functions Related To Number Theory We discuss two functions related to number theory with fractal-like behavior. • Farey Fractions. The geologist Farey (1816) noted them in: “On a curious Property of vulgar Fractions.” His observation then proved by Cauchy (1816). But the curious property already noted earlier by Haros (1802). • Takagi function (Takagi (1903)). This particular continuous function on [0 , 1] is everywhere non-di ff erentiable. 6

  8. Farey Fractions The Farey sequence F N consists of all rational fractions r = p q in [0 , 1], in lowest terms, having max ( p, q )  N . Write them in increasing order as { r n : 0  n  |F N | � 1 } . Thus: F 1 = { 0 1 , 1 1 } , |F 1 | = 2 F 2 = { 0 1 , 1 2 , 1 1 } , |F 2 | = 3 F 3 = { 0 1 , 1 3 , 1 2 , 2 3 , 1 1 } , |F 3 | = 5 7

  9. Farey Fractions-2 • The Farey sequence F N has cardinality 6 ✓ ◆ ⇡ 2 N 2 + O |F N | = N log N . b < a 0 • (Farey’s curious Property) Neighboring elements a b 0 of F N satisfy a 0 det [ a b 0 ] = ab 0 � ba 0 = � 1 . b • The Riemann hypothesis is encoded in the following question ... 8

  10. How well spaced are the Farey fractions? • What we know: Theorem. The ensemble spacing of F N approaches the uniform distribution on [0 , 1] as N ! 1 . The approach holds in many senses, e.g. the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. • However the individual gaps between neighboring member of the Farey sequence F N are of quite di ff erent sizes, varying between 1 1 N and N 2 . • The rate of approach to the uniform distribution is what encodes the Riemann hypothesis, by... 9

  11. Franel’s Theorem • Franel’s Theorem (1924) The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to: For each ✏ > 0 and all N one has |F N | n |F N ) | ) 2  C ✏ N � 1+ ✏ . X ( r n � n =1 • This says, in some sense, the individual discrepancies from 1 uniform distribution are of average size N 3 / 2 � ✏ . • Generalizations to other discrepancy functions given by Mikolas (1948, 1949), and by Kanemitsu, Yoshimoto and Balasubramanian (1995, 2000). 10

  12. A New Question: Products of Farey Fractions (Ongoing work with Harm Derksen) The Farey product F ( N ) is the product of all Farey fractions in F N , excluding 0. • Question 1. How does F ( N ) grow as N ! 1 ? Answer: log F ( N ) = � ⇡ 2 12 N 2 + O ( N log N ) • Question 2. For a fixed prime p , how does divisiblity by p , that is, the function ord p ( F ( N )), behave as N increases? Partial Answer: It exhibits approximately self-similar fractal behavior (empirically) on logarithmic scale. There is a race between primes p dividing numerator versus denominator. 11

  13. Products of Farey Fractions-2 • Theorem. (1) There is upper bound | ord p ( F ( N )) | = O ( N (log N ) 2 ) . (2) Infinitely often one has | ord p ( F ( N )) | > 1 2 N log N. • Conjecture 1. | ord p ( F ( N )) | = O ( N log N ), • Conjecture 2. ord p ( F ( N )) changes sign infinitely often. 12

  14. A Toy Model-Total Farey Sequence The total Farey sequence G N consists of all rational fractions r = p q in [0 , 1], not necessarily given in lowest terms, having max ( p, q )  N . Thus G 4 = { 0 1 , 1 4 , 1 3 , 1 2 ( counted twice ) , 2 3 , 3 4 , 1 1 } , Thus |G 4 | = 8 > |F 4 | = 7 . 13

  15. Products of Total Farey Fractions-1 The total Farey product G ( N ) is the product of all total Farey 1!2!3! ··· N ! fractions, excluding 0. Here G ( N ) = 1 1 2 2 3 3 ··· N N . • Problem 1. How does G ( N ) grow as N ! 1 ? 2 N 2 + O ( N log N ) Answer: log G ( N ) = � 1 • Question 2. For a fixed prime p , how does ord p ( G ( N )) behave as N increases? Answer: There is a race between primes p dividing numerator versus denominator. But now it is analyzable and has provably fractal behavior. 14

  16. Products of Total Farey Fractions-2 • Key Fact. 1 /G ( N ) is an integer, given by a product of binomial coe ffi cients N 1 ⇣ N ⌘ Y G ( N ) = . j j =0 • Theorem. (1) The size of ord p ( G ( N )) is | ord p ( G ( N )) | = O ( N log N ) . (2) ord p ( G ( N ))  0 . Thus it never changes sign. But: ord p ( G ( N ) = 0 infinitely often . 15

  17. 16 --A -M- -- 4 ;c s- 8 • 0

  18. Total Farey Products-Fractal Behavior • Binomial coe ffi cients viewed (mod p ) have self-similar fractal behavior. For example Pascal’s triangle viewed (mod 2) produces the Sierpinski gasket. • Lucas’s theorem(1878) specifies the (mod p ) behavior of ⇣ a ⌘ in terms of the base p expansions of a and b . b • More complicated scaling behavior occurs (mod p n ). • Obtain a scaling limit in terms of the base p -expansion of N . If the top d digits of N are fixed, and one averages over the other digits, then get a kind of limit... 17

  19. Fractal Behavior: Binomial Coe ffi cients modulo 2 18

  20. Farey Products-Fractal Behavior? • From F ( N ) one gets G ( N ), via: N F ( b N Y G ( N ) = j c ) . j =1 • Therefore, by M¨ obius inversion, N G ( b N j c ) µ ( j ) Y F ( N ) = j =1 • Results about G ( N ) permit some analysis of F ( N ). 19

  21. Another Function: The Takagi Function The Takagi function was constructed by Teiji Takagi (1903) as an example of continuous nowhere di ff erentiable function on unit interval. Let ⌧ x � be the distance of x to the nearest integer (a tent function). The function is: 1 ⌧ 2 n x � X ⌧ ( x ) := 2 n n =0 Takagi may have been motivated by Weierstrass nondi ff erentiable function (1870’s). 20

  22. Teiji Takagi (1875–1960) • Teiji Takagi grew up in a rural area, was sent away to school. He read math texts in English, since no texts were available in Japanese. He was sent to Germany in 1897-1901, studied first in Berlin, then moved to G´ ottingen to study with Hilbert. • In isolation, he established the main theorems of class field theory (around 1920). This made him famous as a number theorist. • He founded the modern Japanese mathematics school, writing many textbooks for schools at all levels. 21

  23. Graph of Takagi Function 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 22

  24. Main Property: Everywhere Non-di ff erentiability • Theorem (Takagi (1903)) The function ⌧ ( x ) is continuous on [0 , 1] and has no finite derivative at each point x 2 [0 , 1] on either side. • Base 10 variant function discovered by van der Waerden (1930), Takagi function rediscovered by de Rham (1956). 23

  25. Recursive Construction • The n -th approximant n 1 2 j ⌧ 2 j x � X ⌧ n ( x ) := j =0 • This is a piecewise linear function, with breaks at the 1  k  2 n � 1 . k dyadic integers 2 n , • All segments have integer slopes, in range between � n and + n . The maximal slope + n is attained in [0 , 1 2 n ] and the minimal slope � n in [1 � 1 2 n , 1]. 24

  26. Takagi Approximants- ⌧ 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 � 2 1 1 3 1 4 2 4 25

  27. Takagi Approximants- ⌧ 3 5 5 1 � 1 1 � 1 8 8 1 1 1 1 � 1 2 2 2 3 3 8 8 3 � 3 5 1 1 3 1 3 7 1 8 8 4 8 2 4 8 26

  28. Takagi Approximants- ⌧ 4 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 � 2 2 � 2 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 � 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 � 2 8 8 1 1 4 4 4 � 4 5 5 15 1 1 3 1 3 7 1 9 11 3 13 7 1 16 8 16 16 8 16 4 8 16 2 16 16 4 16 8 27

  29. Properties of Approximants • The n -th approximant n 1 2 j ⌧ 2 j x � X ⌧ n ( x ) := j =0 k agrees with ⌧ ( x ) at all dyadic rationals 2 n . ⌧ n ( k 2 n ) = ⌧ n + j ( k These values then freeze, i.e. 2 n ) . • The approximants are nondecreasing at each step. They approximate Takagi function ⌧ ( x ) from below. 28

  30. Functional Equations • Fact. The Takagi function, satisfies, for 0  x  1, two functional equations: ⌧ ( x 1 2 ⌧ ( x ) + 1 2) = 2 x ⌧ ( x + 1 1 2 ⌧ ( x ) + 1 ) = 2(1 � x ) . 2 • These are a kind of dilation equation, relating function on two di ff erent scales. 29

Recommend


More recommend