financial crises business cycles and bankruptcies in the
play

Financial crises, Business cycles, and Bankruptcies in the Very - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Financial crises, Business cycles, and Bankruptcies in the Very Long Run: France during the 19th Century Vincent Bignon Goal Compile a bankruptcy rate in France, 1820-1913 Study its short-term fluctuations Link them with the


  1. Financial crises, Business cycles, and Bankruptcies in the Very Long Run: France during the 19th Century Vincent Bignon

  2. Goal • Compile a bankruptcy rate in France, 1820-1913 • Study its short-term fluctuations • Link them with the varying policy of the central bank during crises

  3. Roadmap • Computing the bankruptcy rate: the stock of firms (and what type of legal statute) • Extracting the short-term evolutions • Compares them with other business fluctuations indicators • Looks at 19th century financial crises in France • Links the pattern with the changes in the LLR policy of the Banque de France

  4. Hunting the primary numbers • Bankruptcy numbers for each year – Taken in the Comptes de la justice civile et commerciale (1840-1913) and archives • Number of firms that may file for bankruptcy – Excluded the agriculture and (sometimes) Professions libérales – Use a fiscal source: la Patente tax (revolutionary tax on each business selling something on the market) except farmers and some professions libérales

  5. Adjusting the series # of firms for legal changes • Generate spurious fluctuations of the BR – Tax evasion and the 1841 census – Changes in geographic borders: 1860 (Savoie), 1870 (Alsace) – Fiscal reforms: 1844, 1850, 1858, 1862, 1868 • Fiscal reforms modified the population liable to tax’s payment: – Commissioned workers – Professions libérales • Corrections were implemented

  6. What types of firms? • legal framework: 1807 code de Commerce • Individual private firms (unlimited liabilities) • Partnerships – ordinary partnership ( société en nom collectif ): at least 2 individuals liable on personal wealth – limited partnership ( société en commandite simple ): general partner(s) – manage with unlimited liability – and special partner(s) – limited liability – Joint-stock companies, i.e. limited partnership with shares. Liability of partners identical to limited partnerships but shares are tradable – Public company ( société anonyme ): liabilities limited to capital contribution. Before 1867, required gvt agreement

  7. Share of companies in the total # of firms 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Partnership Public companies (limited liabilities)

  8. Share of the limited liabilities companies in the total # of firms 1.4% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 1825 1850 1875 1900

  9. French bankruptcy rate .7% .6% .5% .4% .3% .2% .1% 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10

  10. Long-run vs. short-run fluctuations of the bankruptcy rate • Liquidity dry-ups: – likely impacted the BR in the short run (chain of default)

  11. Long-run vs. short-run fluctuations of the bankruptcy rate • Liquidity dry-ups: – likely impacted the BR in the short run (chain of default) – But they likely do not have a long-run impact

  12. Long-run vs. short-run fluctuations of the bankruptcy rate • Liquidity dry-ups: – likely impacted the BR in the short run (chain of default) – But they likely do not have a long-run impact • Similar to the impact of monetary policy on GDP

  13. Long-run vs. short-run fluctuations of the bankruptcy rate • Liquidity dry-ups: – likely impacted the BR in the short run (chains of defaults) – But they likely do not have a long-run impact • Similar to monetary policy impact on GDP • Key question is whether of more refinancing during crises impacts on the moral hazard (and then on long-run evolution):

  14. Long-run vs. short-run fluctuations of the bankruptcy rate • Liquidity dry-ups: – likely impacted the BR in the short run (chains of defaults) – But they likely do not have a long-run impact • Similar to the impact of monetary policy • Key question is whether of more refinancing during crises impacts on the moral hazard (and then on long-run evolution): will show this is unlikely to have occured

  15. Long-run vs. short-run fluctuations of the bankruptcy rate • Liquidity dry-ups: – likely impacted the BR in the short run (chain of default) – But they likely do not have a long-run impact • Similar to the impact of monetary policy • Key question is whether of more refinancing during crises impacts on the moral hazard (and then on long-run evolution): will show unlikely ⇒ Use of filtering method to separate short-run from long-run components

  16. Vanishing fluctuations of the BR Deviation of the cyclical component of the bankruptcy rate to its trend (HP filter) 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Cyclical component computed with HP filter, Lambda set to 6.5

  17. Vanishing fluctuations of the BR .6 .4 .2 .0 -.2 -.4 -.6 -.8 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Deviation from trend of the bankruptcy rate (HP 100) Deviation from trend of the bankruptcy rate (HP 6.5) Growth rate of the bankruptcy rate

  18. Moving variance of the deviation of the bankruptcy rate (10 yrs) .07 .06 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Moving variance (10 yrs) of the dev iation of the BR (in %) to its trend

  19. Removing the outliers (+ 2 st. dev) .07 .06 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Moving variance of the deviation of the BR (in %) to its trend Mov ing variance of the dev of the BR (in %) to its trend ('31, '33-4, '47 amd 70-1 excl)

  20. IP and BR Deviations compared .5 .4 .3 .2 .1 .0 -.1 -.2 -.3 -.4 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Deviation to the log trend of IP (base 1) Deviation to the log trend of the BR (in % plus 1)

  21. Evolution IP index and BR 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Industrial production (base 1 in 1906-12) Bankruptcy rate in %

  22. Deviations of BR vs wheat price .5 .4 .3 .2 .1 .0 -.1 -.2 -.3 -.4 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Deviation of the BR (in %) to its trend Deviation of the wheat price to its trend

  23. Comparing it with the wheat price .09 .08 .07 .06 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Moving variance (10 yrs) of the dev of the BR (in %) to its trend (outliers excl.) Moving variance (10 yrs) of the deviation of the BR (in %) to its trend Moving variance (10 yrs) of the deviation of wheat price to its trend

  24. Moving variance IP vs. BR .07 .06 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Moving variance (10 yrs) of the dev of the IP (base 1) to its log trend Moving variance (10 yrs) of the deviation of the BR (in %) to its trend Moving variance (10 yrs) of the dev of the BR (in %) to its trend (outliers excl.)

  25. What about financial crises? • Extract financial crises using – Stock prices index (Arbulu, 2006) – 3 months interest rate (offshore –London – before 1870) and onshore after) – CB liquidity ratio: banknote to metallic reserves – CB refinancing ratio: discount to metallic reserves • Shows that crisis occurred regularly • Indicators give broadly the same crises’ years

  26. Deviations of the BR and crises Deviations of the bankruptcy rate (HP filtered) to its trend and Juglar's criterion of crisis 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% -40% 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Deviations (in %) of bankruptcy rate to its trend

  27. Central bank refinancing • Main instrument: bills of exchanges

  28. Central bank refinancing • Main instrument: bills of exchanges • 19th c. changes of monetary policy stance

  29. Central bank refinancing • Main instrument: bills of exchanges • 19th c. changes of monetary policy stance • Two constraints were removed

  30. Central bank refinancing • Main instrument: bills of exchanges • 19th c. changes of monetary policy stance: Two constraints were removed – From a policy of rationing during crises (up to the 1850s) to a policy of rediscounting at will (Bignon, Flandreau and Ugolini, 2010) : increase of metallic reserve

  31. Central bank refinancing • Main instrument: bills of exchanges • 19th c. changes of monetary policy stance: Two constraints were removed – From a policy of rationing during crises (up to the 1850s) to a policy of rediscounting at will (Bignon, Flandreau and Ugolini, 2010) • increase of metallic reserves

  32. Central bank refinancing • Main instrument: bills of exchanges • 19th c. changes of monetary policy stance: Two constraints were removed – From a policy of rationing during crises (up to the 1850s) to a policy of rediscounting at will: • increase of metallic reserve – Change in monetary policy implementation with the development of a network of branches • decentralized refinancing with tight bills’ screening

  33. Evolution CB refinancing (discounts and advances) 28,000 24,000 20,000 16,000 12,000 4,000 8,000 2,000 4,000 0 0 -2,000 -4,000 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Total of discounts and advances Trend (HP filter, lambda=6.5) Cycle

  34. Metallic reserves in the vaults of the central bank 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 C.B. gold and silver reserves (millions of francs)

  35. Deviation of CB refinancing .8 .6 .4 .2 .0 -.2 -.4 -.6 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 Deviation from trend of the total of discounts and advances

Recommend


More recommend