Federico Bianchi The BioRobotics Institute Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa, Italy March 24, 2017 Edinburgh, UK
PROs CONs PROs CONs • CURRENT REFERENCE STANDARD FOR • REQUIRES UNPLEASANT LAXATIVE • MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND • REQUIRES UNPLEASANT AND DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT PREPARATION, SEDATIVES AND PAINLESS AGGRESSIVE LAXATIVE ANALGESIA PREPARATION • DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT IN THE • HIGH PATIENT TOLERABILITY • UNCOMFORTABLE PROCEDURE FOR • LOW ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY SAME SESSION • NEGLIGIBLE RISK OF MANY PATIENTS and HIGHLY FOR DIAGNOSIS • MANUAL FINE CONTROL OF THE PERFORATION DEPENDENT ON ENDOSCOPIST • INABILITY TO STEER THE CAPSULE ENDOSCOPE TIP TRAINING AND ABILITY • INABILITY TO PERFORM THERAPY • LOOPING AND POTENTIAL RISK OF AND TREATMENT PERFORATION
MEDICAL WORKSTATION ROBOTIC GUIDANCE SYSTEM EXTERNAL MAGNET EXAMINATION TABLE
INTERNAL PERMANENT MAGNET ELECTRONIC CONTROL BOARDS SOFT-TETHER STEREOSCOPIC IMAGING MODULE LIGTHING FOR CROMOENDOSCOPY WORKING CHANNEL THERAPEUTIC INSTRUMENT
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION Project Scientific Coordinator: Project Manager Prof. Paolo Dario Dr. Gastone Ciuti The BioRobotics Institute The BioRobotics Institute Supported by the European Commission under the Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Horizon2020 Programme (H2020-ICT-24-Robotics- E-mail: paolo.dario@santannapisa.it E-mail: gastone.ciuti@santannapisa.it 2015: Innovation Actions: Technology transfer – Robotics use cases) - GA number: 688592
Recommend
More recommend