enhancement project
play

Enhancement Project Dan Mahoney - Administrator, Village of Plover - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Little Plover River Watershed Enhancement Project Dan Mahoney - Administrator, Village of Plover Tracy Hames - Executive Director, Wisconsin Wetlands Association April 2019 Little Plover River Watershed Long History of Study & Controversy


  1. Little Plover River Watershed Enhancement Project Dan Mahoney - Administrator, Village of Plover Tracy Hames - Executive Director, Wisconsin Wetlands Association April 2019

  2. Little Plover River Watershed

  3. Long History of Study & Controversy

  4. Vision Improve the health of the LPR and the quality of life of the surrounding community. Use best available data and voluntary conservation actions.

  5. Goals • Improve LPR flow & aquatic health. • Improve surface-groundwater connections & water retention. • Alleviate flooding. • Improve & expand habitat & recreation opportunities.

  6. LPRWEP Partners

  7. Community Leadership

  8. Watershed Perspective Upper 80% of Water Ephemeral Riparian/Riverine Wet Meadows Middle Floodplain Sediment transport Riparian/Riverine Alder/Shrub Carr Lower Depositional Estuaries Marshes Shoreline Wetlands

  9. Groundwater Model

  10. Flow Restoration Plan • Dozens of wells affect flow. • Closer wells have more impact. • Prioritizing actions by location / benefits. • Groundwater model quantifying flow increases. Depletion potential from MODFLOW (WGNHS & USGS)

  11. Potential Flow Restoration Actions • Village well operation changes. • Transitioning irrigated agricultural land to conservation areas. • Additional agricultural irrigation changes. • Other actions.

  12. NRCS RCPP

  13. Implementation

  14. Habitat Projects

  15. Historical Perspective

  16. Upland Grassland Restoration

  17. Upland Forest Restoration

  18. UWSP Forestry Students

  19. Pine and Oak Barrens

  20. Thinning and Invasives Removal

  21. Channel & Floodplain Restoration Wooded: wide & shallow Open: narrow & deep

  22. Historical Perspective - Wetlands 1937 2016

  23. Wetland Restoration - Soik

  24. Historical Perspective – Flow Paths 1937 2016

  25. Soik Property – Ditch Fill

  26. Channel Width – Floodplain Disconnection Reference Reach East of Kennedy Impacted Reach West of Kennedy

  27. Channel Shape East of Kennedy Requires 5 cfs to interact with floodplain

  28. Channel Shape West of Kennedy Requires 45 cfs to interact with floodplain

  29. 1960 Discharge peaked at 50 cfs. Took 2 months to come back to baseflow

  30. 1984 Discharge peaked at 75 cfs. Took 1 month to come back to baseflow.

  31. 2016 Discharge peaked at 70 cfs. Took 10 days to come back to baseflow.

  32. Reshape channel morphology so the stream interacts with its floodplain more frequently. Based on 1.5 year recurrence interval that would be 25-30 cfs.

  33. Forest Restoration – Floodplain

  34. Historical Perspective - Forest Habitat 1937 2016

  35. Main Channel – Alder Removal

  36. Main Channel – Volunteer Work Days

  37. Before After

  38. Main Channel – Alder Bundling

  39. Main Channel – Narrow Channel

  40. Thank You! LPRWEP Partners: Village of Plover Portage County WPVGA WWA WWF MARS WDNR UWSP

Recommend


More recommend