Electromagnetic Form Factors through Parity-Expanded Variational - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Electromagnetic Form Factors through Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Finn M. Stokes Waseem Kamleh, Derek B. Leinweber and Benjamin J. Owen Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 1 / 35

Introduction The isolation of excitations of baryons at nonzero momentum is important for the evaluation of baryon form factors and transition moments Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 2 / 35

Introduction The isolation of excitations of baryons at nonzero momentum is important for the evaluation of baryon form factors and transition moments Existing parity projection techniques are vulnerable to opposite parity contaminations at nonzero momentum Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 2 / 35

Introduction The isolation of excitations of baryons at nonzero momentum is important for the evaluation of baryon form factors and transition moments Existing parity projection techniques are vulnerable to opposite parity contaminations at nonzero momentum We propose the Parity Expanded Variational Analysis (PEVA) technique to resolve this issue Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 2 / 35

Nonzero momentum Eigenstates of nonzero momentum are not eigenstates of parity Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 3 / 35

Nonzero momentum Eigenstates of nonzero momentum are not eigenstates of parity Categorise states by parity in rest frame Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 3 / 35

Nonzero momentum Eigenstates of nonzero momentum are not eigenstates of parity Categorise states by parity in rest frame Call states that transform positively under parity in their rest frame “positive parity states” ( B + ) Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 3 / 35

Nonzero momentum Eigenstates of nonzero momentum are not eigenstates of parity Categorise states by parity in rest frame Call states that transform positively under parity in their rest frame “positive parity states” ( B + ) Call states that transform negatively under parity in their rest frame “negative parity states” ( B − ) Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 3 / 35

Conventional analysis Conventional baryon operators { χ i } couple to states of both parities � m B + � Ω | χ i | B + � = λ B + E B + u B + ( p , s ) i � m B − � Ω | χ i | B − � = λ B − E B − γ 5 u B − ( p , s ) i Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 4 / 35

Conventional analysis Conventional baryon operators { χ i } couple to states of both parities � m B + � Ω | χ i | B + � = λ B + E B + u B + ( p , s ) i � m B − � Ω | χ i | B − � = λ B − E B − γ 5 u B − ( p , s ) i Form correlation matrix e i p · x � Ω | χ i ( x ) χ j ( 0 ) | Ω � � G ij ( p ; t ) := x Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 4 / 35

Parity projection Introduce Γ ± = ( γ 4 ± I ) / 2 and define G ij (Γ ± ; p ; t ) := tr (Γ ± G ij ( p ; t )) Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 5 / 35

Parity projection Introduce Γ ± = ( γ 4 ± I ) / 2 and define G ij (Γ ± ; p ; t ) := tr (Γ ± G ij ( p ; t )) At zero momentum, projected correlators only contain terms for states of a single parity Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 5 / 35

Parity projection Introduce Γ ± = ( γ 4 ± I ) / 2 and define G ij (Γ ± ; p ; t ) := tr (Γ ± G ij ( p ; t )) At zero momentum, projected correlators only contain terms for states of a single parity e − m B + t λ B + λ B + � G ij (Γ + ; 0 ; t ) = i j B + Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 5 / 35

Parity projection Introduce Γ ± = ( γ 4 ± I ) / 2 and define G ij (Γ ± ; p ; t ) := tr (Γ ± G ij ( p ; t )) At zero momentum, projected correlators only contain terms for states of a single parity e − m B + t λ B + λ B + � G ij (Γ + ; 0 ; t ) = i j B + e − m B − t λ B − λ B − � G ij (Γ − ; 0 ; t ) = i j B − Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 5 / 35

Parity projection Introduce Γ ± = ( γ 4 ± I ) / 2 and define G ij (Γ ± ; p ; t ) := tr (Γ ± G ij ( p ; t )) At zero momentum, projected correlators only contain terms for states of a single parity e − m B + t λ B + λ B + � G ij (Γ + ; 0 ; t ) = i j B + e − m B − t λ B − λ B − � G ij (Γ − ; 0 ; t ) = i j B − Can analyse states of each parity independently Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 5 / 35

Nonzero momentum O ( | p | ) opposite parity contaminations at nonzero momentum Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 6 / 35

Nonzero momentum O ( | p | ) opposite parity contaminations at nonzero momentum Could remove single opposite parity state with � m B ∓ ± ( p ) = 1 � Γ E B ∓ ( p ) γ 4 ± I 2 Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 6 / 35

Nonzero momentum O ( | p | ) opposite parity contaminations at nonzero momentum Could remove single opposite parity state with � m B ∓ ± ( p ) = 1 � Γ E B ∓ ( p ) γ 4 ± I 2 Better to use variational analysis to remove all contaminating states simultaneously Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 6 / 35

Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis (PEVA) Terms in unprojected correlation matrix have Dirac structure � E B ± ( p ) ± m B ± � − σ k p k σ k p k − ( E B ± ( p ) ∓ m B ± ) Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 7 / 35

Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis (PEVA) Terms in unprojected correlation matrix have Dirac structure � E B ± ( p ) ± m B ± � − σ k p k σ k p k − ( E B ± ( p ) ∓ m B ± ) Define PEVA projector p = 1 Γ 4 ( I + γ 4 )( I − i γ 5 γ k ˆ p k ) Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 7 / 35

Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis (PEVA) Terms in unprojected correlation matrix have Dirac structure � E B ± ( p ) ± m B ± � − σ k p k σ k p k − ( E B ± ( p ) ∓ m B ± ) Define PEVA projector p = 1 Γ 4 ( I + γ 4 )( I − i γ 5 γ k ˆ p k ) p χ i couples to positive parity states at zero momentum χ i p := Γ Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 7 / 35

Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis (PEVA) Terms in unprojected correlation matrix have Dirac structure � E B ± ( p ) ± m B ± � − σ k p k σ k p k − ( E B ± ( p ) ∓ m B ± ) Define PEVA projector p = 1 Γ 4 ( I + γ 4 )( I − i γ 5 γ k ˆ p k ) p χ i couples to positive parity states at zero momentum χ i p := Γ p γ 5 χ i couples to negative parity states at zero momentum χ i ′ p := Γ Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 7 / 35

Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis (PEVA) Terms in unprojected correlation matrix have Dirac structure � E B ± ( p ) ± m B ± � − σ k p k σ k p k − ( E B ± ( p ) ∓ m B ± ) Define PEVA projector p = 1 Γ 4 ( I + γ 4 )( I − i γ 5 γ k ˆ p k ) p χ i couples to positive parity states at zero momentum χ i p := Γ p γ 5 χ i couples to negative parity states at zero momentum χ i ′ p := Γ Both couple to states with consistent Dirac structure Γ p u B ( p , s ) Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 7 / 35

Lattice results Second lightest PACS-CS (2 + 1)-flavour full-QCD ensemble ◮ 32 3 × 64 lattices ◮ a = 0 . 0951 ( 14 ) fm by Sommer parameter ◮ κ u , d = 0 . 1377, corresponding to m π = 280 ( 5 ) MeV Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Lattice 2016 8 / 35

Electromagnetic Form Factors through Parity-Expanded Variational - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Electromagnetic Form Factors through Parity-Expanded Variational Analysis Finn M. Stokes Waseem Kamleh, Derek B. Leinweber and Benjamin J. Owen Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter Finn M. Stokes (CSSM) Parity-Expanded Variational

Electromagnetic Form Factors of Electromagnetic Form Factors of Electromagnetic Form Factors of

Baryon Electromagnetic Form Factors at BESIII Cristina Morales (Helmholtz-Institut Mainz)

Electromagnetic form factors and the proton radius Jeremy Green NIC, DESY, Zeuthen Advances in

Future Measurements of the Nucleon Elastic Electromagnetic Form Factors at Jefferson Lab G.P.

Electromagnetic and transition form factors of the Baryon Decuplet Hyun-Chul Kim Department of

The Radiative Return and Form Factors at Large Q 2 J.H. K UHN, TTP, KARLSRUHE I Basic Idea

Overview of nucleon form factor measurements Focus on theoretical calculations of form factors

Outline Model fitting and least-squares methods Available form factors ex: sphere,

Gerald A. Miller, UW Definitions, model calculations Meaning of form factors Shape of

Form and Structure Factors: Modeling and Interactions Jan Skov Pedersen, Department of Chemistry

Lecture 2 The atomic form factor 25.01.2017 ? ? See derivation of form factors in the

Radiosity Ray Tracing and Radiosity Ray Tracing and Radiosity Form Factors Form Factors

Projects for EE 473 Electromagnetic Fields I 1. Students will form teams of four. Each team, please

1 Two-Dimensional Parity Internet Checksum Use 1-dimensional parity Idea Add up all

What is Electromagnetic Radiation? The Electromagnetic Spectrum Interactions with Matter

Parity-Violating and Parity-Conserving Asymmetries in ep and eN Scattering in the Qweak

Electromagnetic transition form factor of the meson with WASA-at-COSY Ankita Goswami (for

Solving parity games Definition (Parity game) G = V E , V A , R , : V N where

Impact of Form Factors and Input Condi2ons on Absolute

1-D and 2-D Parity FEC draft-ietf-fecframe-1d2d-parity-scheme-00 IETF 73 November 2008 Ali

Introduction to Risk Parity and Budgeting Chapter 5 Risk Parity Applied to Alternative

Reviews to Enforce Mental Health Parity Regulations Elizabeth Messenger-Jones, IMPAQ Health

Even/odd parity (1) Computers can sometimes make errors when they transmit data. Even/odd

Measurements of the photon-meson transition form factors at BABAR Evgeny Solodov (based on the