efficient coherent noise filtering
play

Efficient Coherent Noise Filtering An application of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Efficient Coherent Noise Filtering An application of shift-invariant wavelet denoising Laurent Duval (IFP) Pierre-Yves Galibert (CGG) EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002 Scope of the paper


  1. Efficient Coherent Noise Filtering An application of shift-invariant wavelet denoising Laurent Duval (IFP) Pierre-Yves Galibert (CGG) EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  2. Scope of the paper • Ground-roll (surface waves removal) – complex issue in land seismic processing • Recent techniques – model based/adaptive • Soubaras (EAGE 2001) – wavelets/packets/frames/pursuit • Deighan & Watts (EAGE 1998) • Castagna, Mars, Ulrych • Focus on 2-D experiments – assessment on 3-D geometries coming EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  3. Overview • Some wavelet facts – the continuous – the discrete (filter bank) – the overcomplete: shift-invariant wavelets (SI) • The results – classical wavelets vs. SI-wavelets – small challenges: aliasing, gaps, wavelet choice – discussion on results • Conclusions & discussion EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  4. A subset of requirements • Wish list – improvements over established f-k filter – memory/storage burden – computational complexity (vs. Fourier/wavelet) – action on unsorted data (X-spread) – robustness to aliasing (wavefields) – robustness to acquisition gaps • Some of them will be met • ... and some not EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  5. The wavelet framework • Continuous wavelets   −  t b  ≅ ∑ ( ) 1 s t K a w     , a b a     2 = j a • Discrete approximation 2 = j b n • Filter bank implementation (Mallat, Daubechies) EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  6. Classical discrete wavelet paradigm • Analysis filter bank • Synthesis filter bank 2 h 0 2 g 0 x x h 1 2 2 g 1 Aliasing! Aliasing removed • Warning! No processing allowed in between EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  7. DWT + denoising (1) 2 H 0 2 R G 0 x x H 1 2 2 S G 1 • With wavelet denoising... – (almost) everything breaks down: G 0 (z)H 0 (z) + G 1 (z)H 1 (z) = 2z -d G 0 (z)H 0 (-z) + G 1 (z)H 1 (-z) = 0 – gives X(-z)H 0 (-z)H 1 (-z)[R(z 2 ) -S(z 2 )] = 0 EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  8. DWT + denoising (2) • New solutions would be – filter dependant – signal dependant – scale dependant • A simple choice would be – give up dependancy (for more freedom) – forget dowsampling/aliasing – redundant/denser wavelet approximation EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  9. Results - Introduction- The data 0 • Ground roll removal 100 on a shot gather • Challenges over 200 classical wavelet 300 – aliasing – gaps 400 – wavelet sensitivity 500 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  10. Results: signal/noise separation Signal Data Noise EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  11. Results: anti-aliasing breakdown • 60 Hz aliasing in unfolded at 65 Hz Classical wavelet SI-wavelet EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  12. Results: gap sensitivity Wavelet noise SI-Wavelet noise Shot with a residual residual 10-trace gap EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  13. Results: gap sensitivity Reference shot Wavelet SI-Wavelet denoising denoising denoising EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  14. Results - Wavelet sensitivity • GR filtering for the poor • Haar wavelet SI effectiveness Haar Ricker Classic Haar SI-Haar EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  15. Pros and cons "When a toolbox only contains one hammer, every problem met is nail-shaped" (Juran) • Some drawbacks – memory expensive – computational cost (O(n. ln (n)) inst. of O(n) for DWT) – more freedom • Some advantages – less ringing and aliasing artifact – less "wavelet" sensitive – less gap sensitive than f-k – random noise removal – more freedom (in processing) EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

  16. Conclusions • Conclusion – an application of the shift-invariant wavelet – somewhat complex but effective – resist to aliasing – resist to gaps • Coming: 3D geometries • Contacts – laurent.duval@ifp.fr, pygalibert@cgg.com • Discussion EAGE 64th Conference & Technical Exhibition Firenze, Italia, 27-30 May 2002

Recommend


More recommend