effectiveness of arch
play

EFFECTIVENESS OF ARCH STRENGTHENING EXERCISES Joy Teo Nicole Ho - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCH HEIGHT AND STRENGTH AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ARCH STRENGTHENING EXERCISES Joy Teo Nicole Ho Rachel Chan Overview Background Aim Hypotheses Method Data Discussion Conclusion Background


  1. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCH HEIGHT AND STRENGTH AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ARCH STRENGTHENING EXERCISES Joy Teo Nicole Ho Rachel Chan

  2. Overview • Background • Aim • Hypotheses • Method • Data • Discussion • Conclusion

  3. Background • Arches of feet are important for: – Stability – Flexibility – Shock absorption – Weight distribution – Assisting feet in adapting to surface changes • Hence weak arches will increase chances of injury

  4. Aim of Project • Determine relationship between arch height and arch strength • Come up with an exercise plan as an intervention • Measure effectiveness of proposed exercise plan

  5. Research Question 1 Which type of arch is the strongest? Hypothesis 1 Low arches are the strongest. • More surface area

  6. Research Question 2 Is the intervention exercise plan effective? Hypothesis 2 It is effective. • Adapted from exercises commonly used by professional ballet dancers to improve arch strength

  7. Methodology • Measuring arch height and categorizing into high, medium and low Foot Arch Ratio • Measuring arch strength using spring balance Grip Test • Month-long intervention with arch strengthening exercises Intervention • Repeat to measure arch strength improvement after intervention Grip Test

  8. Foot Arch Ratio • Calculated from subjects’ footprints on graph paper 𝐶 • 𝐺𝐵𝑆 = 𝐵+𝐶+𝐷

  9. High Arch

  10. Medium Arch

  11. Low Arch

  12. Determining Arch Categories • Average of FAR taken • Standard Deviation (SD) calculated • Upper limit = Ave FAR+ 1 SD • Lower limit= Ave FAR – 1 SD

  13. Results Type of Arch Low Medium High FAR range >0.343 Between 0.257 <0.257 and 0.343 Percentage of 10.3 76.5 13.2 subjects (%) Low, High, 10.3% 13.2% Medium, 76.5%

  14. Categorization

  15. Grip Test • Adapted from the Paper Grip Test commonly used in leprosy patients

  16. Grip Test • Participants to: – Sit upright – Feet flat on ground – Legs kept at right angles – Refrain from using toes to hold

  17. Arch Height and Strength • High arches are stronger – Varying pressure points of different types of feet Arch Type Arch Strength (N) Low 23.6 Medium 21.3 High 29.8

  18. Arch Height and Strength • High arch – Arch elevation reduces contact area with ground – Plantar pressure increases

  19. Arch Height and Strength • Low arch – Even distribution of pressure on foot contact area – Plantar pressure decreases

  20. Arch Height and Strength • Focus of the Grip Test- Plantar Pressure • Favors subjects with high arch • Variety of means to measure Arch Strength

  21. Intervention

  22. Results Improvement in Arch Strength Post- intervention Improved 25% Did not Improve 75%

  23. Results Percentage Improvement in Arch Strength (Post-Intervention) 90 Percentage Improvment (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Low Arch Medium Arch High Arch

  24. Intervention • Arch strengthening exercises proven effective • However some subjects did not improve – Less than 50% of exercises completed – Foot-related injuries

  25. Limitations • Paper grip test only measures one aspect of “strength” • Fat feet vs. flat feet • Limited resources

  26. Conclusion • Relationship between arch height and strength not definite • Research proved – High arches are stronger – Intervention was effective • Intervention exercises can be recommended for use

  27. Recommended extension • Explore other methods of analysing strength – Intrinsic Positive Test – Ultrasonography

  28. Thank you

Recommend


More recommend