effect of local violation of detailed balance
play

Effect of local violation of detailed balance Tridib Sadhu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Effect of local violation of detailed balance Tridib Sadhu Department of physics of complex systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Joint work with Satya N. Majumdar and David Mukamel Ref:arXiv:1106.1838 Tridib Sadhu


  1. Effect of local violation of detailed balance Tridib Sadhu Department of physics of complex systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Joint work with Satya N. Majumdar and David Mukamel Ref:arXiv:1106.1838 Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  2. The model ◮ N particles with symmetric simple exclusion interactions on a square lattice. ◮ Jump rates = 1, across every bond, in both directions. ◮ Detailed balance is satisfied, and the equilibrium density is φ = N / L 2 = ρ , everywhere. Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  3. Local perturbation Locally perturb the system, but still maintaining detailed balance. ◮ For example, introduce a local potential r = � � − h at � 0 V ( � r ) = 0 elsewhere ◮ Equilibrium density.  1 r = � at � 0  ρ − 1 (1 − ρ ) e − h +1  φ ( � r ) = ρ − O (1 / L 2 )  elsewhere  Effect is local Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  4. What if the perturbation locally breaks detailed balance? ◮ For example, change the jump rate across a single bond. ◮ Effect is non-local . � 1 / r 2 y direction | φ ( � r ) − ρ | ∼ 1 / r elsewhere Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  5. Main results 1. For arbitrary local configuration of driving bonds, in dimensions d ≥ 2 Algebraically decaying local violation of ⇒ = density profiles. detailed balance 2. Decay exponent depends on local arrangement of driving bonds. 3. A correspondence with electrostatic is established where φ is the potential due to electric dipoles at the driving bonds. Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  6. Outline ◮ Locally driven non-interacting particles ◮ Analogy to electrostatic potential due to charges ◮ Exact solution ◮ Local drive with exclusion interaction Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  7. Non-interacting particles Let φ ( � r , t ) = the density of particles at site � r , at time t . and � 0 ≡ (0 , 0), � e 1 ≡ (1 , 0) The master equation for the density profile φ ( � r , t ): � � r , t ) + ǫφ ( � r , t ) = ∇ 2 φ ( � ∂ t φ ( � 0) δ � 0 − δ � , r ,� r ,� e 1 where discrete Laplacian ∇ 2 φ ( m , n ) = φ ( m +1 , n )+ φ ( m − 1 , n )+ φ ( m , n +1)+ φ ( m , n − 1) − 4 φ ( m , n ) Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  8. ◮ Steady state equation � � ∇ 2 φ ( � r ) = − ǫφ ( � 0) δ � 0 − δ � r ,� r ,� e 1 ◮ Equation for potential due to a dipole. ◮ Strength of the dipole is not known a priori , but can be determined self-consistently. Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  9. ◮ Steady state equation � � ∇ 2 φ ( � r ) = − ǫφ ( � 0) δ � 0 − δ � r ,� r ,� e 1 � � r ) = ρ + ǫφ ( � r ,� ◮ Solution: φ ( � 0) G ( � 0) − G ( � r ,� e 1 ) , where ρ = global average density, and ∇ 2 G ( � r ,� r o ) = − δ � r ,� r o r ,� 0) − G ( � 0 ,� Table: Exact values of G ( � 0) q \ p 0 1 2 . . . − 1 2 0 0 π − 1 . . . 4 − 1 − 1 4 − 2 1 1 . . . 4 π π 2 4 − 2 1 − 4 2 π − 1 . . . π 3 π . . . . . . . . . . . . Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  10. � � r ) = ρ + ǫφ ( � r ,� ◮ Solution: φ ( � G ( � 0) − G ( � r ,� 0) e 1 ) , ◮ Self-consistency equation: � � φ ( � 0) = ρ + ǫφ ( � G ( � 0 ,� 0) − G ( � 0) 0 ,� e 1 ) , ⇒ φ ( � 0) = ρ/ (1 − ǫ/ 4) Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  11. � � r ) = ρ + ǫφ ( � r ,� ◮ Solution: φ ( � G ( � 0) − G ( � r ,� 0) e 1 ) , ◮ Self-consistency equation: � � φ ( � 0) = ρ + ǫφ ( � G ( � 0 ,� 0) − G ( � 0) 0 ,� e 1 ) , ⇒ φ ( � 0) = ρ/ (1 − ǫ/ 4) ◮ At large � r , r ) − ρ = − ǫφ ( � 0) � e 1 · � r + O ( 1 φ ( � r 2 ) 2 π r 2 and current r ) = ǫφ ( � � � 0) 1 e 1 − 2( � e 1 · � r ) � r + O ( 1 � j ( � r ) = −∇ φ ( � � r 3 ) . 2 π r 2 r 2 Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  12. In d -dimensions The analogy to electrostatics holds in higher dimensions. ◮ Then, in d ≥ 2 r ) ∼ 1 / r d − 1 φ ( � ◮ In d = 1, Green’s function G ( x , x o ) = −| x − x o | / 2, then φ ( x ) = ρ − ( ǫ/ 2) φ (0) sgn ( x ) , Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  13. Arbitrary driving configuration � � � r ,� r ,� φ ( � r ) = ρ + ǫφ ( i 1 ) G ( � i 1 ) − G ( � i 1 + � e 1 ) � � � r ,� r ,� + ǫφ ( i 2 ) G ( � i 2 ) − G ( � i 2 + � e 1 ) + · · · k self-consistency equations obtained by r = � i 1 ,� putting � i 2 · · · . These are a set of linear equations, and can be solved using known solutions of G . Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  14. Quadrupolar charge configuration The steady state equation � � ∇ 2 φ ( � r ) = − ǫφ ( � 0) 2 δ � 0 − δ � e 1 − δ � . r ,� r ,� r , − � e 1 Solution � � 2 � r ) − ρ = − ǫφ ( � 0) 1 � � e 1 · � r + O ( 1 φ ( � r 2 − 2 r 4 ) , r 2 2 π with φ ( � 0) = ρ/ (1 − ǫ/ 2) . Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  15. A side note ◮ Collection of biased bonds does not necessarily imply breakdown of detailed balance. ◮ Detailed balance with respect to a Gibbs distribution φ ( � r ) ∝ exp[ − V ( � r )] , where V ( � r ) = − ln(1 − ǫ ) δ � r ,� 0 Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  16. Analogy to magnetic fields ◮ In 2- d , magnetic field by ( i → j ) link H = ln[ e ij ] ◮ Then for a bond = ln[ e ij ] − ln[ e ji ] H ln[ e ij = ] e ji Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  17. ◮ Kolmogorov criterion: Detailed balance if and only if α 1 α 2 α 3 α 4 = β 4 β 3 β 2 β 1 on all loops ◮ In terms of magnetic field: H = ln[ α 1 α 2 α 3 α 4 � zero ⇐ ⇒ Detailed balance ] = non-zero ⇐ ⇒ No detailed balance β 4 β 3 β 2 β 1 Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  18. Exclusion interaction ◮ The steady state equation for density � � ∇ 2 φ ( � r ) = − ǫ � τ ( � 0)(1 − τ ( � e 1 ) � δ � 0 − δ � , r ,� r ,� e 1 where � 1 If there is a particle � τ ( � r ) = and φ ( � r ) = � τ ( � r ) � � 0 No particle � ◮ Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  19. Exclusion interaction ◮ The steady state equation for density � � ∇ 2 φ ( � r ) = − ǫ � τ ( � 0)(1 − τ ( � e 1 ) � δ � 0 − δ � , r ,� r ,� e 1 where � 1 If there is a particle � τ ( � r ) = and φ ( � r ) = � τ ( � r ) � � 0 No particle � ◮ Unlike the non-interacting case, the pre-factor has to be determined separately. However, the exponent of the power-law decay remains same . Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  20. Exclusion interaction ◮ The d = 1 result is very similar to the profile obtained in SSEP with a battery by [ Bodineau, Derrida and Lebowitz]. Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  21. Exclusion interaction ◮ In d = 2 Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  22. Numerical results On a 200 × 200 lattice with ρ = N / L 2 = 0 . 6 ρ Non-Interacting: φ ( � 0) = 1 − ǫ/ 4 Exclusion interaction: � τ ( � 0)(1 − τ ( � e 1 ) � = 0 . 3209 measured separately Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  23. Global bias Steady state equation for Non-interacting case � � ∇ 2 φ ( � r ) = − ǫφ ( � 0) δ � 0 − δ � + µ [ φ ( � r ) − φ ( � r − � e 1 )] r ,� r ,� e 1 Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  24. Take home message System in Equilibrium local perturbation with detailed balance Local changes Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  25. Take home message System in Equilibrium localy break local perturbation detailed balance with detailed balance Non-equilibrium Local changes No changes Non-local Changes Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  26. Summary ◮ An electrostatic correspondence, where density φ is the potential due to an electric dipole at the driving bonds. For the non-interacting case the current is analogous to electric field. ◮ Analogous quantity of magnetic field to check detailed balance. Open problem What would happen, if other kind of local interparticle interactions (Ising like) are switched on? Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

  27. Thank you Tridib Sadhu Long-range profile

Recommend


More recommend