education
play

Education Daniel F. ONeill, Psy.D. Linda L. McDowell, Ph.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CHOICES: An Innovative Approach to Alcohol Education Daniel F. ONeill, Psy.D. Linda L. McDowell, Ph.D. Millersville University Freshman Year Experience National Conference February 9, 2009 Orlando, Florida CALL TO ACTION A Call to


  1. CHOICES: An Innovative Approach to Alcohol Education Daniel F. O’Neill, Psy.D. Linda L. McDowell, Ph.D. Millersville University Freshman Year Experience National Conference February 9, 2009 Orlando, Florida

  2. CALL TO ACTION  A Call to Action , 2002 NIAAA  What Colleges Need to Know Now: Update on College Drinking , 2008 NIAAA  Millersville University Task Force on Alcohol, 1999

  3. THE All-TOO-FAMILIAR BAD NEWS  1700 alcohol related unintentional injury student deaths ages 18-24 in 2001 (6% increase from 1998)  500,000 students between the ages of 18 and 24 are unintentionally injured under the influence of alcohol (Hingson et al., 2002).  696,000 students 18-24 assaulted by another student who has been drinking  97,000 students 18-24 victims of alcohol related sexual assault or date rape  (Hingson et al 2005)

  4. Millersville University  8,300 students  Founded 1855  One of 14 state owned PA State System of Higher Education  79% full time undergraduates  56% of undergrads are women  Most students from PA or contiguous states  32% residential students

  5. Millersville University  American College Health Assessment (2007)  21.9% students did not use alcohol in past year  36.5% students did not use alcohol in past 30 days  59.9% drink 4 or less when they partied or socialized  85% use designated drivers  84.7% ate before or during drinking occasion  14.1% used marijuana in last month (727 randomly selected respondents to self-report online survey)

  6. Prevention Efforts  Prevention Programming  Wellness Center Peer Educators  Alcohol Screening @ Counseling Center  Late Night Activities through Student Program Office  E-chug  Stall Talk  Facebook “flyers”  CHOICES for students who violated the Alcohol Policy

  7. CHOICES: Background  Marlatt & Parks (2005)  University of Washington  Alcohol Skills Training Program  BASICS  Published by The Change Companies

  8. CHOICES  Facilitated Discussion  Non Judgmental  Harm Reduction NOT Abstinence Based  Motivational Interviewing (Miller)  Four sections  Reflections on personal relationship with alcohol  Facts  Risk  Strategies

  9.  http://www.changecompanies.net/flash/pages /prevention/choices/journal/index.html

  10. Orientation Program  2007 Fall Orientation Program  First formal Orientation activity for students  Faculty and Staff facilitators  Orientation Groups  25students  Orientation Leader (upperclassman)  90 minute groups  ~$5000 cost for all first year students  Grant Supported Funding: PA. Liquor Control Board

  11. RECRUITING FACULTY & STAFF Appeal across the University Letter to potential facilitators Follow up phone calls Diverse voices: More than “the choir” (e.g.. Football Coach, Priest, Head of Admissions…)

  12. FACULTY TRAINING  Pilot Program Training  George Parks, Ph.D.  Follow up small group training  Second Year Training  Small group training for new facilitators  Veteran “brush ups”

  13. Training Guidelines  Background information: defining the problem  Careful review of journal  Tips for running an effective group  How to involve the Orientation Leader  Encouraging discussion  Preventing student “war stories”  Keeping track of time

  14. STUDENT TRAINING  Orientation Leaders  CHOICES group  Expectations—encouraging participation  Working with a facilitator  Appropriate “sharing” of college experience

  15. Packets for First Year Students  Interactive Journal  BAC cards  Alcohol Poisoning Information  MU Alcohol Brochure  Pens  Pre-Test and Post-Test

  16. Assessment  Student Satisfaction Survey  Pre/Post test data  Faculty/Staff feedback

  17. Student Evaluation “ The Choices program was helpful.”  2007 o Strongly Agree 9.82% o Agree 49.65% o Did not attend 7.47% o Disagree 23.65% o Strongly Disagree 9.41%

  18. Student evaluation: “ The Choices Program was helpful.”  2008  Strongly Agree 24.19%  Agree 35.40%  Neutral 25.58%  Disagree 9.95%  Strongly Disagree 6.46%

  19. I thnk it’s important to have A plan in mind to limit my drinking before I go to a Party  SA  Strongly Agree: 52.20% 66.99%  A  Agree: 39.96% 26.93%  D  Disagree: 6.27% 2.56%  SD  Strongly Disagree: 0.39% 0.20%

  20. Question 9: If a friend passes out…  SA  SA 62.68% 77.38%  A  A 28.31% 14.69%  D  D 5.78% 1.57%  DS  DS 1.86% 2.84%

  21. Facilitator Feedback  “In the end, I asked them if they had learned anything new. They said that a lot of the CHOICES material was covered in high school classes, but they did learn:  how to recognize alcohol poisoning  how quickly alcohol gets in the bloodstream  how long it takes to leave  the 24/7 Safe Haven rule at Health Services”

  22. FACILITATOR FEEDBACK  Well I survived! It was a great experience. My first group was barely awake and except for 3 were very reluctant to talk. My second group was much different. They were very outgoing and a little too honest for comfort! Their Orientation Leader was probably more involved that she should have been but it was very helpful.

  23. FACILITATOR FEEDBACK  I wish I had a better feeling about my performance yesterday. The second session was a bit better than the first. About half the group showed up late to the first session. In both groups but especially the first, only 2 or 3 where slightly vocal. Some would have rather died then lift the pencil or read the booklet. Tough crowd. I wish I had observed a group or been able to co-facilitate with another staff person. I don’t think everyone showed up to Choices. In the second group one of the freshmen was a member of my Brownie troop several years ago. I don’t think that was a problem for her but I can’t be sure.

  24. IMPACT  Common Language  Over four years all students will have participated in a CHOICES group  Strong foundation for follow-up prevention efforts  Consistency in both prevention and intervention efforts: CHOICES…..BASICS

  25. GOALS FOR THE FUTURE  Expand faculty participation  Reduce group size  Involve Orientation Leaders more effectively  Expand Assessment to include follow up  Connect CHOICES and ACHA

  26. Lessons Learned Lessons Learned  Program Integrity  Orientation Leader expectations/training  # of Facilitators  Timing  Late Attrition  Assessment

  27.  QUESTIONS?

  28. Contact Information  Daniel O’Neill  daniel.oneill@millesville.edu  717.872.3127  Linda McDowell  linda.mcdowell@millersville.edu  717.871.2388

Recommend


More recommend