dublin rural lag sub committee
play

Dublin Rural LAG Sub-Committee: Fingal LEADER LDS Strategy 14 - 22 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dublin Rural LAG Sub-Committee: Fingal LEADER LDS Strategy 14 - 22 Workshop Thursday 14 th January 2016 10.00am - 12.45pm, Chamber, County Hall, Swords. AGE GEND NDA 1. Intr trod oductio tion & Purpos rpose e David


  1. Dublin Rural LAG Sub-Committee: Fingal LEADER LDS Strategy ’14 - ’22 Workshop Thursday 14 th January 2016 10.00am - 12.45pm, Chamber, County Hall, Swords.

  2. AGE GEND NDA 1. Intr trod oductio tion & Purpos rpose e – David vid Pryor, r, FCC, , Works kshop op Chair. ir. 2. Finga ngal l LEADE DER R Programm amme e – Ove vervie rview w & Client lient Surve rvey y , Phil il Moore, e, FLP. 3. LEADE DER R - New Governa ernanc nce Structu tures es - Breffni O’ Rourke, EE&TD Dept. 4. 4. LDS Strategy egy (Guid uidelines elines & Framewor work k , Key Themes, es, Actio ion n Templ plate) te) - Bil ill l Thorne rne, , Exodea dea Europ ope e Consul nsultan tants ts Ltd. d. 5. Facil acilitated itated Works kshop op Repo ports ts - Phil il Moore, e, Rober bert t Colli llins, ns, Nelly ly & James FLP. . 6. Wrap ap-up p - Ed Hearne, ne, Directo tor, r, EE&TD Dept. t.

  3. 1. Purpose of Today To update, meet and explore areas of potential for future LEADER LDS • funding in 2016 + via existing projects (roll over) and new projects. To discuss what t should ould be the Fing ngal al regio iona nal l strate tegy gy in tandem with the • South Dublin and Dún Laoghaire Rathdown areas. Identify entify the strate tegi gic themes es and proj ojec ects ts under RDP theme:- • - In which location? - Previous work to be built upon? - Who will be the Strategic Partners? - Indication of timing - Ready to go, Early development, Advanced, Start-up/feasibility - Funding needs

  4. 2.0 Phil il Moo oore, e, Fingal ngal LEA EADE DER R Par artn tnership ership

  5. 2.1 LEADER ‘07 - ’13: Key Highlights Programme Budget € 7.78m (revised to € 6.4m) • First projects processed in June 2009 • Strong start with a high level of project applications received through • EOI’s following consultation process Calls for proposals published for key measures throughout the • lifetime of the programme (targeted process) Total Proj ojects ects proc ocessed ssed = 260 260 • Projects rejected by LAG = 7 • Total Progr ogramme amme Spend end = € 6. 6.0m 0m • Match Funding Generated = € 4.5m • Total Reve venue e Gener erated ated = € 10 10.5m 5m • 6

  6. 2.2 Dublin blin Rural al LEA EADE DER R Ca Catc tchmen ment t Area ea 14-22 22 7

  7. 2.3 Dublin blin Rural al – Fingal ngal Ca Catc tchment ment Area FINGAL • Donabate • Portrane • Rush • Lusk • Loughshinny • Skerries (Holmpatrick) • Balrothery • Balbriggan (Stephenstown, Balscadden) • Naul • Garristown • Oldtown • Ballyboughal

  8. 2.7 Types ypes of of Fu Fund nding ing Supports pports of offe fered ed by th the LEA EADER DER Progr ogramme amme Capital & Equipment Animation Village/Town Capacity Renewal Building & Projects Training Networking Feasibility Group Plans & Marketing & Studies Clustering

  9. 2.8 LEA EADER DER Surve rvey y 2015 -Draft aft Cl Client ent Findings ndings 205+ Surveys completed to 31 Dec ‘15; • 10 10 Commun unit ity y Consul ultati tation on events nts held • Fing ngal al 5: South th Dublin lin County ty 2: Dun un Laoghai haire e Rathdown n 3: • Focus Group Meeti tings gs = 2 • Recorded ed Attend ndanc ance e rang nged ed from 3 to 25 25 - Average age 15 Atten endee ees • (total tal atten endan ance ce = 125) • Targete rgeted consul ultati tation on by Post = 75. 75. • Socia ial Media ia accessib ibili ility ty also o used. • Future completion of calls for new EOI’s, post LDS strategy finalisation / Contract (March • 2016) 6) 13

  10. 2.9 LEADE ADER R Consu sultation tations - Potenti ntial al Projects ts via Commu ommunit ity y Consu sult ltation ation Recreational Space, Parks & Playgrounds • Community centre provision & upgrade • Rural youth facility/youth café • Training Programmes for targeted sectors • Information points in villages (re service provision) • New tourism products • Community Crime Study for Rural Dublin region • Historic Graveyards Project • Men’s Shed • Rural Dublin Broadband Audit • Corduff Science & Innovation Centre • Village Impact statements • Heritage trails • Heritage site promotion & development (many listed). •

  11. 2.10 0 Soc ocia ial l In Inclus lusion ion – Key y Co Comments ents • Lack of Communit unity y infr frastruc astructur ture • Lack of Youth th facili liti ties es / / Servi rvices es • Po Poor r Suppo pports ts for r Senior niors • Poor r Rural al Transport nsport Provis visio ion • Access to Train inin ing g & & Capacit ity y Build ldin ing g for r volunt unteers eers • Lack of Text t Alert rt/Crim /Crime e Preve vention ntion initi tiati ative ves • Need for r ‘One -stop stop- shop’ for or inform ormati ation on.

  12. 2.11 Ec Econ onomic omic & Bu Busin siness ess Suppor pports ts • Lack of adequate uate enterp erprise rise space • Lack of incubat batio ion n units ts for r start rt- up’s • Poor r or no inter erne net/ t/br broadb oadband and access • Lack of access to training & mentoring for SME’s • Provis visio ion n of marketi eting ng tools ls & & supports for SME’s • New Tourism urism Product duct Develo lopme pment nt • Mark rketi eting ng & Promot motio ion n of key Herit itage age sites

  13. 2.12 2 Rural al En Envir vironment onment • Lack of community awareness towards the protection of habitats, environment and landscape • Educational programme on biodiversity/climate change • Renewable energy products and education

  14. 2.13 LEADER ‘07 - ’13: Lessons Learned! Process was labour intensive and requires stream-lining  A “Guide Book” for applicants/promoters required  Forum for pre-evaluation of projects would be useful  Cohesive approach to Project development between agencies e.g. Local  Authority departments etc Strict limit on Project time-extensions (max 3 months) required  Training for LAG members, Sub-committee members and staff on the  Operational Rules of the Programme to ensure all understand the regulations both National and European as applies to LEADER. Training in Public Procurement Procedures for staff and LAG  18

  15. 3.0 LEA EADER DER (2014-2020) 020) Progr ogramm amme 1. European Commission (EAFRD) 2. Programme Management (DCELG: DAFM) 3. Project Management LAG/Financial Partner 4. LAG/ LDS 5. IP / FLP 6. Client Projects

  16. 3 .1 LEADER ‘14 – ’20: So What’s Different? The e Primacy macy of of th the LAG! G! Profession essional al Citi tizens zens and d Organisat nisation ions, , Local al and State e their eir Local al Unions, , Agencies ies & Local al Communi munity ty Farmer ers, , Authoriti rities es Organis ganisati ations ons Ent nterp erprise rises, s, & Entrepr epren eneurs eurs Env nvironmental onmental Local Development Ass ssociations ciations Bodies

  17. 3.2 Loc ocal al Dev v Str trat ategy egy Proj oject ect Flow Animation Project Application LDS IP Staff IP Staff LAG Decision Makers and Staff (CC’s / IP) Evaluation Committee Recommendations General Reporting and Audit Roles/Responsibilities LAG Decision Makers (Oversight) & IP Staff Oversight: DECLG Funding Approval LAG Decision Makers Project Monitoring Funding Drawdown Promoter Contract LAG, IP Staff and LAG, IP Staff and IP and Promoter Financial Partners Financial Partners

  18. 3.3 L LAG G Go Governa ernance nce - Key y Poi oints nts • Local Government Reform Act (2014) set a new role for Local Authorities positioning it as the key driver of local economic & community development. • Establishment of the Dublin Rural Local Action Group (LAG) & appointment of Fingal County Council as the Financial authority. • LAG receives, assesses, selects and fixes the amount of support. • LAG to monitor the implementation of the community led LDS ,the projects supported, carrying out evaluation activities linked to strategy. • LAG to facilitate good governance; transparency; sound financial management; informed decision making and Accountability to stakeholders.

  19. 4. 0 L LDS S Gu Guide ideli lines es - Frame amewor work

  20. 4.1 Finga ngal l LDS S Acti tion on Frame amework work - Templ mplate ate Action ion Framework ork – Theme me 1: Econom nomic ic, Enterp rpris rise & Job Creation ion Title of Local Objective LO1 LEADER Theme Economic and Enterprise Development and Job Creation LEADER Sub-Theme 1.1. Rural Tourism Rationale for the Objective Link to the LECP Dún Laoghaire Rathdown LECP, Fingal LECP, South Dublin LECP Financial Allocation No. of Strategic Actions Code LO1:SA1 Title of Strategic Action Brief Description of Strategic Action Link to LECP Primary Target Group(s) Geographic Area Organisation who will deliver the action Collaborating Organisations Timeframe of Delivery of the Action Anticipated Outputs/Indications and Targets Number of Projects New Existing Sustained Jobs Projected Jobs Type of Initiative Total Capital LEADER Funding Match Funding Cost per job Visitor Numbers

Recommend


More recommend