DOE Office of High Energy Physics (HEP) Snowmass Program Managers’ Meeting I nstrumentation Frontier CSS2013 • Snowmass on the Mississippi Minneapolis, Minnesota July 29 – August 6, 2013 Peter Kim Program Manager – Detector R&D Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
Detector � R&D � Program � Detector � R&D � Program � � Develop the next generation of detectors for particle physics and supports research leading to fundamental advances in the science of particle detection and instrumentation. – “generic” research on the physics of particle detection that has potential for wide applicability and/ or high impact. – Provide graduate and postdoctoral research training, equipment for experiments and related computational efforts – Support for engineering and other technical efforts and equipment required for experimental detector R&D and fabrication � Started in 2008 as a separate program in Advanced Technology R&D (KA25) Program M anagers: H. Nicholson (2008-2010), F . Borcherding (2010-2012), P . Kim/ G. Crawford (2012- ) Advanced Detector Research (ADR) Funding opportunities (Last issued in 2011) Collider Detector Research & Development (CDRD) in 2011 (Funded in FY12-FY14) Annual Comparative Review, since FY 2012 18
DOE � HEP � Organization DOE � HEP � Organization Office of High Energy Physics HEP Budget and Planning Donna Gilbert HEP Operations James Siegrist (IPA) Dean Oyler Kathy Yarmas Sherry Pepper-Roby John Boger Larry Price (Detailee) Eric Colby (IPA) Research & Technology Division Facilities Division Glen Crawford Mike Procario Janice Hannan Kristi Naehr Vera Bibbs Christie Ashton Wanda Morris Physics Research Instrumentation Research Technology Facility Operations Facilities Development & Major Systems General Accelerator R&D Energy Frontier Fermilab Complex LARP L.K. Len Abid Patwa NOvA – Ted Lavine John Kogut Bruce Strauss John Boger David Boehnlein (IPA) MicroBooNE – Ted Lavine Eric Colby (IPA) James Stone (IPA) Mu2e – Ted Lavine Ken Marken LHC Operations Muon Accelerator (MAP) LSSTcam – Helmut Marsiske Michael Zisman (Detailee) Simona Rolli Bruce Strauss APUL – Bruce Strauss Intensity Frontier James Stone (IPA) Detector R&D LBNE – Mike Procario Alan Stone Glen Crawford (Acting) Belle-II – Helmut Marsiske Tim Bolton (IPA) Other Operations Peter Kim (Detailee) CMS Upgrade – Simona Rolli (SLAC/Other Labs) ATLAS Upgrade – Simona Rolli Cosmic Frontier Computational HEP John Kogut Kathy Turner DESI – Kathy Turner Lali Chatterjee Michael Salamon Muon g-2 – Ted Lavine Larry Price (Detailee) Dark Matter G2 – Helmut Marsiske Theoretical Physics SBIR/STTR Simona Rolli Ken Marken
HEP � Budget � Overview � HEP � Budget � Overview � – – FY14 FY14 • The President’s Request (PR) budget usually comes out ~ February each year � HEP FY14 PR budget submitted ~ November 2012; released ~ April 2013 � The ACTUAL budget for the FY is usually different – following the House, Senate process & budget approval. � FY2014 budget philosophy was to enable new world-leading HEP capabilities in the U.S. through investments on all three frontiers – Accomplished through ramp-down Research and operations of existing Projects – When we were not able to fully implement this approach ( i.e., start new projects), converted planned project funds to R&D: Research � Projects � Research • Therefore, the FY14 Request shows increases for Research that are due to this added R&D “bump”, while Construction/ project funding is only slightly increased • In the interim (since submission of FY14 Request), actual FY13 Research funding also increased because of inability to get projects started • Initial FY14 plan for Research will be down more than the originally advertised 2-3% relative to FY13 – Details in following slides… � Impact of these actions: – Several new efforts are delayed: LHC detector upgrades, LBNE, 2 nd Generation Dark M atter detectors, M S-DESI • – US leadership/ partnership capabilities will be challenged by others – Workforce reductions at universities and labs � Key areas in FY2014 Request – M aintaining forward progress on new projects via Construction and Research (incl. R&D for projects) funding lines 12
Recent � Funding � Trends Recent � Funding � Trends 70.0% Ramp up ILC and Trading Projects for more Research SRF R&D programs 60.0% 50.0% Research 40.0% Facilities Projects 30.0% Other 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 • In the late 90’s the fraction of the budget devoted to projects was about 20%. • Progress in many fields require new investments to produce new capabilities. • The projects started in 2006 are coming to completion. • New investments are needed to continue US leadership in well defined research areas. • Possibilities for future funding growth are weak. M ust make do with what we have. 13
One � Possible � Future � Scenario � One � Possible � Future � Scenario � Trading Research for more Projects • About 20% (relative) reduction in Research fraction over ~ 5 years � In order to address priorities, this will not be applied equally across Frontiers • This necessarily implies reductions in scientific staffing � Some can migrate to Projects but other transitions are more difficult • We have requested Labs to help manage this transition as gracefully as possible 14
FY � 2014 � High � Energy � Physics � Budget � FY � 2014 � High � Energy � Physics � Budget � (Data � in � new � structure, � dollars � in � thousands) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Explanation of Change Description Actual J uly Plan Request [FY14 Request vs. FY12 Actual] Energy Frontier Exp. Physics 159,997 148,164 154,687 Ramp-down of Tevatron Research Completion of NO � A (MIE), partially Intensity Frontier Exp. Physics 283,675 287,220 271,043 offset by Fermi Ops Cosmic Frontier Exp. Physics 71,940 78,943 99,080 Ramp-up of LSST-Camera Theoretical and Computational Physics 66,965 66,398 62,870 Continuing reductions in Research Advanced T echnology R&D 157,106 131,885 122,453 Completion of ILC R&D FY14 includes Accelerator Stewardship 2,850 3,132 9,931 Stewardship-related Research SBIR/ STTR 0 0 21,457 Construction (Line Item) 28,000 11,781 35,000 Mostly Mu2e; no LBNE ramp-up wrt FY13: Up +3.6% after SBIR correction Total, High Energy Physics: 770,533 (a) 727,523 (b,c) 776,521 wrt FY12: Down -2% after SBIR correction 4,621,075 (c) Ref: Office of Science (SC): 4,873,634 5,152,752 SBIR = Small Business Innovation Research STTR = Small Business Technology Transfer (a) The FY 2012 Actual is reduced by $ 20,327,000 for SBIR/ STTR. (b) The FY 2013 [J uly Plan] is reduced by $ 20,791,000 for SBIR/ STTR. (c) Reflects sequestration. 15
HEP � Advanced � Technology � R&D HEP � Advanced � Technology � R&D FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Funding (in $K) Actual J uly Plan Request Comment Research 134,006 111,888 105,303 Selected long-term R&D moves General Accel. R&D 59,280 61,791 57,856 to Accelerator Stewardship Directed Accel. R&D 46,587 22,692 23,500 Completion of ILC R&D Funding for liquid argon R&D Detector R&D 28,139 27,405 23,947 is reduced Completing SRF infrastructure at Fermilab Facility Operations 23,100 19,997 17,150 TOTAL, Advanced Technology R&D 157,106 131,885 122,453 � $24M originally set aside for Generic Detector R&D � FY10-FY13 higher with infusion from ARRA, CDRD, Liquid Ar R&D � Fraction of the University grants = ~1/ 8 of Det R&D over the years � Plan is to try keeping it near last year’s level of $3.2M .
Major � Item � of � Equipment � (MIE) � Issues Major � Item � of � Equipment � (MIE) � Issues Brookhaven National Laboratory � We were not able to implement Muon g-2 Ring: On Barge, Departing Southern Long Island June 25, 2013 [most] new M IE-fabrication starts in the FY14 request On Barge, Through Joliet Locks; July 20, 2013 – M uon g-2 experiment is the only new start in HEP that was not requested in FY13 – LSST-Camera and Belle-II, which Entering Fermilab-site, Eola Rd. Gate; July 26, 2013 didn’t receive approval in FY13, are requested again in FY14 � This upsets at least 2 major features of our budget strategy: – Strategic plan: “Trading Research for Projects” – Implementation of facilities balanced across Frontiers 18
HEP � Physics � MIE � Funding HEP � Physics � MIE � Funding FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Funding (in $K) Actual J uly Plan Request Description M IE’s 55,770 45,687 39,000 NO � A ramp-down 41,240 19,480 0 Intensity Frontier Intensity Frontier 6,000 5,857 0 M icroBooNE Reactor Neutrino Detector Intensity Frontier 500 0 0 at Daya Bay Intensity Frontier 1,030 5,000 8,000 Belle-II Intensity Frontier 0 5,850 9,000 Muon g-2 Experiment Cosmic Frontier 1,500 1,500 0 HAWC Large S ynoptic Survey Cosmic Frontier 5,500 8,000 22,000 T elescope (LSST) Camera TOTAL M IE’s 55,770 45,687 39,000 19
Recommend
More recommend
