documenting in the age of emr
play

Documenting In The Age of EMR SPAP 2019 EMR/EHR Beginnings Mid - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Documenting In The Age of EMR SPAP 2019 EMR/EHR Beginnings Mid 1960sClinical Information Systems Lockheed -> Tenhnicon -> TDS Healthcare -> Eclipsys -> Allscripts University of Utah with 3M developed Health Evaluation


  1. Documenting In The Age of EMR SPAP 2019

  2. EMR/EHR Beginnings • Mid 1960’sClinical Information Systems • Lockheed -> Tenhnicon -> TDS Healthcare -> Eclipsys -> Allscripts • University of Utah with 3M developed Health Evaluation through Local Processing (HELP) • Mass General with Harvard made Computer Stored Ambulatory Record (COSTAR) in 1968 • 1970’s Department of Veteran Affairs made VistA • 1980-90’s Institute of Medicine published a study to argue the case for using EHR

  3. Recent Developments • President Bush mentioned in 2004 State of the Union • President Obama incorporated EHR into the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) • Where “Meaningful Use” started which mandates transition to HER treating patients covered by government programs

  4. Most Common EMRs

  5. Pediatric patient safety event report data from inpatient and outpatient settings that were entered in the period 2012–17 were retrieved from three large academic health care institutions (two stand-alone pediatric institutions and one adult and pediatric institution) that used Epic and Cerner EHRs (two institutions used Epic, and one used Cerner).

  6. More than 3,000 medical errors at pediatric hospitals from 2012 to 2017 were due in part to EMR/EHR problems, a study in Health Affairs found. About 1 in 5 of these could have caused patient harm.

  7. In the first evaluation of its kind, we found that nearly two-thirds of safety reports related to the EHR and medication at three pediatric hospitals were associated with usability issues.

  8. Where We Make Mistakes • Demographics • Templates • Importing (copy and paste) • Actual/factual documentation • Privacy

  9. Demographics • Name issues • Gender issues • Wrong chart

  10. Name Issues • Sound alike names • Spacing or punctation • Computer problems

  11. Gender Issues • EMR limitations • Insurance companies • Need factual information

  12. Wrong Patient • Same issues from paper charts, but can be easier to miss • More mistakes in a busier practice • Name issues (demographics)

  13. Templates • Insurance companies • Personalization • Right template • Time saver?

  14. Insurance Companies • MagMutual one of the first to oppose templates • Templates the most common place for errors to happen • Improved over time

  15. Personalization • Make it your own • Metadata mark

  16. Make It Your Own • Design your own templates with your wording • Document or change something

  17. Metadata

  18. Importing • Cloning • Every chart looks the same

  19. Cloning

  20. Documenting • Did you actually do it? • Did you do it and not document? • Personalization

  21. In the past: You did not do it if you did not document it!

  22. Did you do it? • If exam and other elements are left unaltered its harder to prove they were done • Finished note looks incomplete at times

  23. Privacy • Portals • Printed notes • Insurance EOB • Can lead to missed information

  24. Restrictions not always good

Recommend


More recommend