diameter preserving surjections in the geometry of
play

Diameter Preserving Surjections in the Geometry of Matrices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Diameter Preserving Surjections in the Geometry of Matrices Combinatorics 2010, Verbania (VB), Italy July 2nd, 2010 Joint work with Wen-ling Huang (Hamburg, Germany) Supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project M 1023 H ANS H AVLICEK F


  1. Diameter Preserving Surjections in the Geometry of Matrices Combinatorics 2010, Verbania (VB), Italy July 2nd, 2010 Joint work with Wen-ling Huang (Hamburg, Germany) Supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project M 1023 H ANS H AVLICEK F ORSCHUNGSGRUPPE D IFFERENTIALGEOMETRIE UND G EOMETRISCHE S TRUKTUREN I NSTITUT F ¨ UR D ISKRETE M ATHEMATIK UND G EOMETRIE T ECHNISCHE U NIVERSIT ¨ D IFFERENTIALGEOMETRIE UND AT W IEN G EOMETRISCHE S TRUKTUREN havlicek@geometrie.tuwien.ac.at

  2. Rectangular Matrices Let M m,n ( D ) , m, n ≥ 2 , be the set of all m × n matrices over a division ring D . • Two matrices (linear operators) A, B ∈ M m,n ( D ) are adjacent if A − B is of rank one. (Rank always means left row rank.) • We consider M m,n ( D ) as an undirected graph the edges of which are precisely the (unordered) pairs of adjacent matrices. • Two matrices A, B ∈ M m,n ( D ) are at the graph-theoretical distance k ≥ 0 if, and only if, rank( A − B ) = k.

  3. Grassmannians Let G m + n,m ( D ) be the Grassmannian of all m -dimensional subspaces of D m + n , where m, n ≥ 2 . • Two subspaces V, W ∈ G m + n,m ( D ) are adjacent if dim( V ∩ W ) = m − 1 . • We consider G m + n,n ( D ) as an undirected graph the edges of which are precisely the (unordered) pairs of adjacent subspaces. • Two subspaces V, W ∈ G m + n,m ( D ) are at the graph-theoretical distance k ≥ 0 if, and only if, dim( V ∩ W ) = m − k.

  4. Connection M m,n ( D ) can be embedded in G m + n,m ( D ) as follows: M m,n ( D ) → M m,m + n ( D ) → G m + n,m ( D ) A �→ ( A | I m ) �→ left rowspace of ( A | I m ) G m + n,m ( D ) may be viewed as the projective space of m × n matrices over D .

  5. Hua’s Theorem Fundamental Theorem (1951). Every bijective map ϕ : M m,n ( D ) → M m,n ( D ) : A �→ A ϕ preserving adjacency in both directions is of the form A �→ TA σ S + R, where T is an invertible m × m matrix, S is an invertible n × n matrix, R is an m × n matrix, and σ is an automorphism of the underlying division ring. If m = n , then we have the additional possibility that A �→ T ( A σ ) t S + R where T, S, R are as above, σ is an anti-isomorphism of D , and A t denotes the transpose of A . The assumptions in Hua’s fundamental theorem can be weakened. . ˇ W.-l. Huang and Z.-X. Wan (2004), P Semrl (2004).

  6. Chow’s Theorem Fundamental Theorem (1947). Every bijective map ϕ : G m + n,n ( D ) → G m + n,n ( D ) : X �→ X ϕ preserving adjacency in both directions is induced by a semilinear mapping f : D m + n → D m + n : x �→ x σ T such that X ϕ = X f , where T is an invertible ( m + n ) × ( m + n ) matrix and σ is an automorphism of the underlying division ring. If m = n , then we have the additional possibility that ϕ is induced by a sesquilinear form g : D m + n × D m + n → D : ( x, y ) �→ xT ( y σ ) t such that U ϕ = U ⊥ g , where T is as above and σ is an anti-isomorphism of D . The assumptions in Chow’s fundamental theorem can be weakened. W.-l. Huang (1998).

  7. Geometries of Matrices Similar fundamental theorems (subject to technical restrictions) hold for: • Spaces of Hermitian matrices ( D a division ring with involution ). • Spaces of symmetric matrices ( D commutative). • Spaces of alternate matrices ( D commutative) (with a different definition of adjacency: rank A − B = 2 ). • The associated projective matrix spaces (dual polar spaces). In all cases the fundamental theorem is essentially a result on isomorphisms of graphs with finite diameter.

  8. Diameter Preservers Recent work focusses on diameter preservers between matrix spaces and related structures. . ˇ P . Abramenko, A. Blunck, D. Kobal, M. Pankov, P Semrl, H. Van Maldeghem, H. H. In this lecture we aim at pointing out the common features.

  9. Main Theorem Below we shall state five conditions (A1)–(A5) on a graph, one of them being the finiteness its diameter. Theorem (W.-l. Huang and H. H.). Let Γ = ( P , E ) and Γ ′ = ( P ′ , E ′ ) be two graphs satisfying the conditions (A1)–(A5) . If ϕ : P → P ′ is a surjection which satisfies d ( x ϕ , y ϕ ) = diam Γ ′ for all x, y ∈ P , d ( x, y ) = diam Γ ⇔ then ϕ is an isomorphism of graphs. Consequently, diam Γ = diam Γ ′ .

  10. Application Conditions (A1)–(A5) are satisfied by the graphs on the following spaces ( m, n ≥ 2 ): • The graph on the space M m × n ( D ) of rectangular matrices provided that |D| � = 2 . • The graph on the Grassmannian G m + n,m ( D ) for any D . • The graph on the set of Hermitian n × n matrices over a division ring D with involution (subject to certain technical restrictions). By applying the known fundamental theorems, explicit descriptions of these diameter preserving surjections can be given.

  11. Conditions (A1)–(A5) We focus our attention on graphs Γ = ( P , E ) satisfying the following conditions: (A1) Γ is connected and its diameter diam Γ is finite. (A2) For any points x, y ∈ P there is a point z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) = diam Γ . (A3) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = 1 and d ( x, y ) = 2 there is a point w satisfying d ( x, w ) = d ( y, w ) = 1 and d ( z, w ) = 2 . (A4) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with x � = y and d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = diam Γ there is a point w with d ( z, w ) = 1 , d ( x, w ) = diam Γ − 1 , and d ( y, w ) = diam Γ . (A5) For any adjacent points a, b ∈ P there exists a point p ∈ P \ { a, b } such that for all x ∈ P the following holds: � � d ( x, p ) = diam Γ ⇒ d ( x, a ) = diam Γ ∨ d ( x, b ) = diam Γ .

  12. Conditions (A1)–(A5) We focus our attention on graphs Γ = ( P , E ) satisfying the following conditions: (A1) Γ is connected and its diameter diam Γ is finite. (A2) For any points x, y ∈ P there is a point z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) = diam Γ . (A3) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = 1 and d ( x, y ) = 2 there is a point w satisfying d ( x, w ) = d ( y, w ) = 1 and d ( z, w ) = 2 . (A4) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with x � = y and d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = diam Γ there is a point w with d ( z, w ) = 1 , d ( x, w ) = diam Γ − 1 , and d ( y, w ) = diam Γ . (A5) For any adjacent points a, b ∈ P there exists a point p ∈ P \ { a, b } such that for all x ∈ P the following holds: � � d ( x, p ) = diam Γ ⇒ d ( x, a ) = diam Γ ∨ d ( x, b ) = diam Γ .

  13. Condition (A2) z y x (A2) For any points x, y ∈ P there is a point z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) = diam Γ .

  14. Conditions (A1)–(A5) We focus our attention on graphs Γ = ( P , E ) satisfying the following conditions: (A1) Γ is connected and its diameter diam Γ is finite. (A2) For any points x, y ∈ P there is a point z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) = diam Γ . (A3) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = 1 and d ( x, y ) = 2 there is a point w satisfying d ( x, w ) = d ( y, w ) = 1 and d ( z, w ) = 2 . (A4) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with x � = y and d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = diam Γ there is a point w with d ( z, w ) = 1 , d ( x, w ) = diam Γ − 1 , and d ( y, w ) = diam Γ . (A5) For any adjacent points a, b ∈ P there exists a point p ∈ P \ { a, b } such that for all x ∈ P the following holds: � � d ( x, p ) = diam Γ ⇒ d ( x, a ) = diam Γ ∨ d ( x, b ) = diam Γ .

  15. Condition (A3) y w z x (A3) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = 1 and d ( x, y ) = 2 there is a point w satisfying d ( x, w ) = d ( y, w ) = 1 and d ( z, w ) = 2 .

  16. Conditions (A1)–(A5) We focus our attention on graphs Γ = ( P , E ) satisfying the following conditions: (A1) Γ is connected and its diameter diam Γ is finite. (A2) For any points x, y ∈ P there is a point z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) = diam Γ . (A3) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = 1 and d ( x, y ) = 2 there is a point w satisfying d ( x, w ) = d ( y, w ) = 1 and d ( z, w ) = 2 . (A4) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with x � = y and d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = diam Γ there is a point w with d ( z, w ) = 1 , d ( x, w ) = diam Γ − 1 , and d ( y, w ) = diam Γ . (A5) For any adjacent points a, b ∈ P there exists a point p ∈ P \ { a, b } such that for all x ∈ P the following holds: � � d ( x, p ) = diam Γ ⇒ d ( x, a ) = diam Γ ∨ d ( x, b ) = diam Γ .

  17. Condition (A4) x y w z (A4) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with x � = y and d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = diam Γ there is a point w with d ( z, w ) = 1 , d ( x, w ) = diam Γ − 1 , and d ( y, w ) = diam Γ .

  18. Conditions (A1)–(A5) We focus our attention on graphs Γ = ( P , E ) satisfying the following conditions: (A1) Γ is connected and its diameter diam Γ is finite. (A2) For any points x, y ∈ P there is a point z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( x, y ) + d ( y, z ) = diam Γ . (A3) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = 1 and d ( x, y ) = 2 there is a point w satisfying d ( x, w ) = d ( y, w ) = 1 and d ( z, w ) = 2 . (A4) For any points x, y, z ∈ P with x � = y and d ( x, z ) = d ( y, z ) = diam Γ there is a point w with d ( z, w ) = 1 , d ( x, w ) = diam Γ − 1 , and d ( y, w ) = diam Γ . (A5) For any adjacent points a, b ∈ P there exists a point p ∈ P \ { a, b } such that for all x ∈ P the following holds: � � d ( x, p ) = diam Γ ⇒ d ( x, a ) = diam Γ ∨ d ( x, b ) = diam Γ .

Recommend


More recommend