determine which options are recommended for further study
play

DETERMINE WHICH OPTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR FURTHER STUDY OPTIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OBJECTIVE OF THE PDP: DETERMINE WHICH OPTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR FURTHER STUDY OPTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY MUST INCLUDE: BASE REPAIR PDP: DELIVERABLES ADDITION RENOVATION NEW CONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING SITE OPTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY MAY


  1. OBJECTIVE OF THE PDP: DETERMINE WHICH OPTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR FURTHER STUDY OPTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY MUST INCLUDE: • BASE REPAIR PDP: DELIVERABLES • ADDITION RENOVATION • NEW CONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING SITE OPTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY MAY INCLUDE : • NEW CONSTRUCTION ON ALTERNATE SITE(S)

  2. PDP PSR Preliminary Preferred Schematic Design Program Report MODULE 1 MODULE 2 MODULE 3 MODULE 4 MSBA PROCESS MODULE 5 MODULE 6 MODULE 7 MODULE 8 CURRENT PROJECT STATUS

  3. COMPACT URBAN SITES WORCESTER, MA COMPACT URBAN SITES QUINSIGAMOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WOODLAND ACADEMY NORRBACK AVENUE SCHOOL

  4. ADDITION RENOVATION

  5. PHASED OCCUPIED CONSTRUCTION NELSON PLACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SOUTH HIGH COMMUNITY SCHOOL

  6. WORCESTER TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL

  7. SBC Vote to Submit SBC Vote to Submit PDP to MSBA: SD Package to MSBA: Sept. 2019 July 2020 MSBA Vote FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHEDULE BID Building SBC Vote to Submit PSR to Occupancy: MSBA: Fall 2024 December 2019 MSBA Vote

  8. PDP TASKS Alternate Site Evaluation of Program Evaluation Existing Building & Development Site PDP: CRITICAL TASKS RECOMMENDATION OF OPTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY

  9. BUBBLE DIAGRAMS 420,000 Gross Square Feet Required by Proposed Educational Program

  10. PROPOSED CHAPTER 74 PROGRAMS: ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY Enrollment: 400 Students (Existing to be expanded) MARKETING MANAGEMENT & FINANCE CHAPTER 74 PROGRAMS Enrollment: 200 Students PROGRAMMING & WEB DEVELOPMENT Enrollment: 200 Students CONSTRUCTION CRAFT LABORER Enrollment: 150 Students

  11. 5 1 4 3 2 6 SITE CRITERIA # ORDER OF PRIORITY

  12. ALL 10+ ACRE PARCELS WITHIN THE DOHERTY QUADRANT PHASE I SITE SELECTION PROCESS

  13. ELIMINATED PARK LAND, PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED, AND PROHIBITIVE OWNERSHIP PHASE I SITE SELECTION PROCESS ST. PETER MARAN CHANDLER MAGNET SCHOOL FOLEY STADIUM

  14. 20 ACRES  Established location  Steep topography  Abutted by park land  Highland street access only A. DOHERTY SITE

  15.  Potential to develop pedestrian access to Foley Stadium A. DOHERTY TO FOLEY STADIUM 1 MILE 0.5 MILE 1.5 MILES TO CHANDLER MAGNET SCHOOL 0.3 MILE

  16. 20 ACRES  No Land Acquisition  Adequate Staff Parking  Premium $$$ Parking beneath fields (or option for no student parking) GARAGE BELOW A.1 DOHERTY SITE

  17. : PHASE I 20 ACRES  Pave around existing building to maximize parking  No practice fields available A.1 DOHERTY SITE

  18. : PHASE II 20 ACRES  Demolition of existing building  Construction of roads for bus circulation  Occupancy of new building A.1 DOHERTY SITE

  19. : PHASE III 20 ACRES  Extended schedule for completion of site work and athletic fields above parking GARAGE BELOW A.1 DOHERTY SITE

  20. 12 ACRES  Flat, developed site  Unsuitable soil conditions  Beaver Brook culvert  Beaver Brook Park, not regulation size fields  Recently refurbished Foley Stadium is heavily used by the district and community B. FOLEY STADIUM SITE

  21. 12 ACRES  No Land Acquisition  Adequate Staff Parking  No Student Parking Shown (Option for Premium $$$ Student Parking) B.1 FOLEY STADIUM SITE

  22. 22 ACRES  Tiered site  Steep topography  Limiting parcel shape  Multiple access points  Existing 1950’s school building  C. CHANDLER MAGNET SITE WSU Adjacency

  23. 22 ACRES  No Land Acquisition  Adequate Staff Parking  Adequate Student Parking  Compromised building organization C.1 CHANDLER MAGNET SITE  Limited athletic fields  Difficult access to upper fields

  24. 22 ACRES  Land Acquisition from Worcester State University LLC & abutters  Adequate Staff Parking  Adequate Student Parking C.2 CHANDLER MAGNET SITE  Most efficient development  Least impact to Doherty Students

  25. ALTERNATIVE SITE RANKING MATRIX ALTERNATE SITE RANKING MATRIX

Recommend


More recommend