detector physics measurements in microboone
play

Detector Physics measurements in MicroBooNE Sowjanya Gollapinni, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detector Physics measurements in MicroBooNE Sowjanya Gollapinni, UTK (for the MicroBooNE Collaboration) Joint DUNE/SBN Meeting: Lessons Learned, Fermilab, May 15, 2017 The MicroBooNE LArTPC Surface-based, 89-ton active volume liquid argon


  1. Detector Physics measurements in MicroBooNE Sowjanya Gollapinni, UTK (for the MicroBooNE Collaboration) Joint DUNE/SBN Meeting: Lessons Learned, Fermilab, May 15, 2017

  2. The MicroBooNE LArTPC Surface-based, 89-ton active volume liquid argon ● One drift chamber B ● e a m d i r Cathode at -70kV e – c t i o n Drift at 2.56 m – E-field at 273 V/cm – -70 kV Three wire planes ● Cathode Anode 2 induction, 1 collection – 3 mm wire pitch – Drift=2.56 m 3 mm wire plane spacing – PMT and UV Laser System ● Y (up) Collecting cosmic and neutrino Z (beam) ● E = 273 V/cm data since Fall 2015 X (drift) 2

  3. LArTPC Technology LArTPC technology provides particle interactions with unprecedented amount of ● detail and allows exceptional calorimetry and high resolution tracking However, complete understanding of the physics that surrounds the drifting ● electron and precise calibration are essential to achieve physics performance Critical for the SBN and DUNE program – With plenty of data, MicroBooNE is making excellent progress towards this effort! – Neutrino Event Cosmic Event 3

  4. Ionization charge in a LArTPC Precise determination of ionization charge and position, from the point of formation ● to the point of collection, with as less bias as possible is critical for both energy scale reconstruction and detector resolution There are many effects that can impact this ● Image credit: Y.-T. Tsai Ionization 4

  5. Ionization charge in a LArTPC Precise determination of ionization charge and position, from the point of formation ● to the point of collection, with as less bias as possible is critical for both energy scale reconstruction and detector resolution There are many effects that can impact this, E.g., ● – Argon purity (e - lifetime) – Electron-ion recombination Energy scale These effects are not – Space charge – Electronics calibration independent, everything effects everything – which is – Diffusion what makes this – Space charge Position/timing challenging! – Noise Resolution – Wire response 5

  6. This Talk We will focus on, ● Space charge effect ● Electron lifetime measurement ● Electron-ion recombination ● Electron diffusion Example of how these effects are connected: Calorimetry dQ/dx (ADC/cm) → → dQ/dx (e/cm) → → dQ*/dx (e/cm) → → dE/dx (MeV/cm) Purity Electronics Electron-ion correction calibration factor Recombination Correction 6

  7. This Talk We will focus on, ● Space charge effect ● Electron lifetime measurement ● Electron-ion recombination ● Electron diffusion Example of how these effects are connected: Calorimetry m) → d → dQ*/d /dx (e (e/c /cm) → d → dE/d /dx (Me (MeV/c V/cm) dQ/d /dx x (A (ADC/c /cm) m) → → dQ/d /dx x (e/c (e/cm) Purity Electronics Electron-ion correction calibration factor Recombination Correction 7

  8. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE MicroBooNE is surface detector → abundant cosmic rays ● Build up of slow moving Ar + ions in the detector due to, ● for example, cosmic rays, which results in: Local variations of E-field: 12% increase at Cathode; 5% E-field distortions decrease at Anode (central Z slice) Spatial variations in ionization position: Around 5cm distortion along drift; Around 12 to 15 cm along non-drift directions t t n n e e v v e e y y a a r r c c i i m m s s o o C C Spatial distortions (central Z slice) Aro round 20-30 nd 20-30 cosmic mic ra rays in a in a 4.8 ms 8 ms re reado dout 8 win indo dow

  9. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE Space charge effects (SCE) seen in ● LASER Laser data and muon tracks tagged by an external – “small” muon counter (MuCS) Measurement using MuCS tagged tracks ● Pros: “t0” known – Cons: limited angular coverage (this will improve – with the full tagger system now in place) MuCS system coverage Yellow: tracks triggered by MuCS Red: not triggered by MuCS More details in MuCS tracks E. Grammellini's 9 talk

  10. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE Measurement using MuCS tracks Data and MC reasonably agree in terms of ● LASER basic shape and normalization Offset near anode in data: ● Is liquid argon flow pushing the ions near – the anode? Interesting ideas on testing this theory: – e.g. vary pump flow and see how it effects ion SCE MuCS tracks MuCS tracks 10

  11. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE: outlook Read all about our space charge preliminary results in our public note: ● http://www-microboone.fnal.gov/publications/publicnotes/ – MICROBOONE-NOTE-1018-PUB (November, 2016) On-going & Future work to fully characterize/calibrate the SCE in MicroBooNE ● MuCS moved to various Z boundaries and data taken → data currently being analyzed – Using UV laser data to do 3D calibration for space charge – We have the laser data, current focus on developing end-to-end Laser data ● reconstruction Laser system doesn't provide full coverage: plan to fill the gap with additional “t0 ● known” cosmic data such as A-C crossing tracks, A/C piercing tracks etc. Great progress recently towards understanding time dependence of SCE – Stay tuned for more results soon! – Later we will see, SCE significantly impacts lifetime and recombination measurements ● 11

  12. Space charge effects in MicroBooNE Read all about our space charge preliminary results in our public note: ● http://www-microboone.fnal.gov/publications/publicnotes/ – Lessons learned for SBN/DUNE: MICROBO BOONE-N -NOTE-1018 -1018-P -PUB (N (November mber, 2016 2016) – SCE a challenge for any surface-based LArTPCs ● On-going & Future work to fully characterize/calibrate the SCE in MicroBooNE ● Effect will be worse for ProtoDUNE due to longer drift – MuCS moved to various Z boundaries and data taken → data currently being – analyzed Availability of “t0-known” tracks with good phase space coverage ● critical to properly characterize and calibrate this effect in 3D Plan to use UV laser data to do 3D calibration for space charge – Importance of Laser system, Cosmic ray tagger system cannot be – We have the laser data, current focus on developing end-to-end Laser data ● understated reconstruction Requires dedicated studies at the design stage to understand the phase Laser system doesn't provide full coverage: plan to fill the gap with – ● space coverage from TPC tracks additional “t0 known” cosmic data such as A-C crossing tracks, A/C piercing tracks etc. Studies to understand (experimentally) how liquid argon flow impacts – Great progress recently towards understanding time dependence of space ion movement is important – charge effect Stay tuned for more results soon! – Later we will see, SCE significantly impacts lifetime and recombination measurements ● 12

  13. This Talk We will focus on, ● Space charge effect ● Electron lifetime measurement ● Electron-ion recombination ● Electron diffusion Example of how these effects are connected: Calorimetry m) → d → dQ*/d /dx (e (e/c /cm) → d → dE/d /dx (Me (MeV/c V/cm) dQ/d /dx x (A (ADC/c /cm) m) → → dQ/d /dx x (e/c (e/cm) Purity Electronics Electron-ion correction calibration factor Recombination Correction 13

  14. Impurities in argon & charge loss Electro-negative impurities such as (O 2 and H 2 O) can capture drifting electrons and ● result in signal loss electron drift-lifetime Measuring e - lifetime tells us ● Ionization signal loss @ given E-field – O 2 contamination in argon – Electron lifetime and O 2 impurity ● contamination are inversely proportional O 2 Contamination (in ppb) = 0.3/ τ (in ms) MicroBooNE For Example, In MicroBooNE, to achieve 36% signal loss (or 5 ms lifetime at 273 V/cm), ● require O 2 equivalent concentration to be less than 60 ppt 14

  15. Measuring electron lifetime Many ways to measure this: Anode to Cathode charge ratio ● With thin 30 d days ys o of th the e filtrati tion p proces ess Purity Monitors (e.g. ICARUS, MicroBooNE) – Long Cosmic muon tracks (e.g. ICARUS) – < 50 ppt of O 2 Laser (e.g. ArgonTube) – < 100 ppt of O 2 More details in Pur urity Mon Monitor or M. Zuckerbrot's talk MICROBOONE-NOTE-1003-PUB (May 2016) 15

  16. Measuring electron lifetime Many ways to measure this: Anode to Cathode charge ratio ● With thin 30 d days ys o of th the e filtrati tion p proces ess Purity Monitors (e.g. ICARUS, MicroBooNE) – Long Cosmic muon tracks (e.g. ICARUS) – < 50 ppt of O 2 Laser (e.g. ArgonTube) – < 100 ppt of O 2 UV Laser: : would be be gr grea eat if one e ca can do it ● Pur urity Mon Monitor or Uniformity of ionized charge along the – track is important Advantages es Disadvantages es Quick (online) measurement Localized measurement By far the best way to measure ● ● ● purity is using long cosmic muon Doesn't require Cannot always be ● ● tracks reconstructed tracks extrapolated to the entire TPC volume Wide angular coverage ● Great for commissioning & ● S initial data runs when Cannot be used to study R Can represent purity through out ● ● O T reconstruction is still being purity variations in the TPC I the TPC and can be used to N O worked out M understand purity variations over Y Typically at lower E-fields T ● I the entire volume R U 16 P Longevity is a problem ●

Recommend


More recommend