demystifying dna demystifying dna
play

Demystifying DNA Demystifying DNA What is it? How do I get it? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Demystifying DNA Demystifying DNA What is it? How do I get it? What is it? How do I get it? How do I get rid of it? How do I get rid of it? Alissa Bjerkhoel Litigation Coordinator, California Innocence Project Panel Attorney,


  1. Demystifying DNA – Demystifying DNA – What is it? How do I get it? What is it? How do I get it? How do I get rid of it? How do I get rid of it? Alissa Bjerkhoel Litigation Coordinator, California Innocence Project Panel Attorney, Appellate Defenders, Inc. Panel Attorney, Sixth District Appellate Program

  2. NOT A SCIENTIST SCIENTIST Disclaimer I AM NOT A SCIENTIST

  3. PRE‐DNA Forensic “Sciences”

  4. Microscopic Hair Comparison

  5. Bullet Comparison

  6. Fingerprint Comparison

  7. Tool Mark Comparison

  8. Tire Tread Impression

  9. Bite Mark Comparison

  10. Shoe Print Evidence

  11. 2009 NAS Report “With the exception of nuclear DNA analysis, however, no forensic method has been rigorously shown to have the capacity to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source. “

  12. DNA TESTING

  13. Common Sources *Red blood cells do not contain DNA.

  14. Not So Common Sources Trees and Plants Pets Bugs and Bacteria

  15. Chromosomes  23 pairs of chromosomes  46 total chromosomes

  16. Surrounded by Protein Dense Packets of DNA

  17. Molecular Structure  NUCLEOTIDES 1. Base (A, C, G, T). • cytosine (C) • thymine (T) • adenine (A) • guanine (G) 2. Five‐carbon sugar (D). • deoxyribose 3. Phosphate group (P).

  18. Locus  The position or location of a particular piece of DNA is commonly referred to as a locus ( loci for more than one). Locus

  19. Genetic Markers  Scientists examine the genetic locations (loci) where the number of sequence repeats are the most variable amongst humans

  20. Alleles  Each locus (location of DNA on specific set of chromosomes) has two “alleles”  Alleles may be dominant or recessive

  21. Genetic Discrimination  Variable loci provide the capability of using DNA testing for human identity.

  22. • FLORIDA = 19,550,000 • TAMPA = 352,957 • MAIN STREET = 54 • HOUSE LOCATED AT 123 = 6 • LAST NAME ‐ SMITH = 4 • FIRST NAME ‐ JOHN = 1

  23. PRE‐DNA TYPING Two Main Steps: 1. Extraction 2. Quantification

  24. Isolation/Extraction of DNA

  25. Extraction Techniques  Chemical and biological procedures are used to separate DNA molecules from other material .

  26. Quantification

  27.  Must quantify the amount of human DNA.  Need appropriate DNA levels for subsequent DNA amplification & typing.  Optimal amounts result in higher quality data and easier data interpretation

  28. Spectrofluorometers  DNA stained with a fluorescent dye.  The fluorescent intensity is measured with a spectrofluorometer.

  29. DNA TYPING (profiling/fingerprinting)

  30. RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism)

  31. Alec Jeffreys ‐ 1985

  32. Jul 16, 2010 RFLP , Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Flash Lecture,DNA Fingerprinting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfZkn7D6dro

  33. Analysis The size of the target DNA fragments are measured & compared (each fragment length is considered an allele).

  34. Colin Pitchfork

  35. • What they mostly look like:

  36.  Other problems with RFLP =

  37. PCR‐Based Testing Methods

  38. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KoLnIwoZKU

  39. PCR Inhibition  PCR amplification can be affected by substances known as “inhibitors.”

  40. Early Testing Kits

  41. DQa1 Kits  First PCR‐based DNA test kit.  Relatively low power of discrimination.

  42. PM‐DQa1 kits (PolyMarker)

  43. PM‐DQa1 kits (PolyMarker)

  44. Short Tandem Repeat (STR)

  45. What is an “STR”? Short segments of our DNA that are next to each other (tandem) and repeat over and over again.

  46. Benefits of More Markers • Over time, DNA breaks down (degrades) • Larger fragments of DNA break down first, smaller later (harder to rip a small piece of paper than a large one)

  47. Post‐Amplification Testing

  48.  Amplified product is then subjected to capillary electrophoresis for separation.  Alleles are separated by size using a gel or capillary method.  The machine produces an electropherogram report.

  49. In two‐minute form . . .

  50. Comparing Reports

  51. YSTR

  52. Y‐STR  Detects alleles at different areas on the male chromosome.

  53. Y‐STR  Good for cases where lots of female DNA.  Passed down from father to son

  54. mtDNA (mitochondrial testing)

  55. About  mtDNA is the DNA located inside the mitochondria within cells.  mtDNA is organized as a circular, covalently closed, double‐stranded DNA.

  56.  mtDNA is inherited solely from the mother.

  57. Nucleotide Position Cambridge Reference Sequence (CRS) Differing Sequences from CRS

  58. Pros  Ability to obtain DNA profiles from evidence that is not suitable for nuclear DNA analysis.  Helpful in associating maternally related individuals.  Lowest power of discrimination. Any maternally related individuals will share the same mtDNA profile.  Longest processing time of any DNA test.

  59. How to Get DNA Testing: PENAL CODE SECTION 1405

  60. 1405 Requirements (1) CONDITION: Evidence is available and in a condition that would permit DNA testing. (2) CHAIN OF CUSTODY: Evidence to be tested has been subject to a chain of custody. (3) IDENTITY AN ISSUE: Identity of the perpetrator of the crime was, or should have been, a significant issue in the case. (4) MATERIAL: Evidence sought to be tested is material to the issue of the convicted person’s identity as the perpetrator. (5) REASONABLE PROBABILITY: Results would raise a reasonable probability that, in light of all the evidence, the convicted person’s verdict or sentence would have been more favorable. (6) PRIOR TESTING: Evidence was not tested previously or was tested previously, but the requested DNA test would provide results that are reasonably more discriminating and probative of the identity of the perpetrator or accomplice or have a reasonable probability of contradicting prior test results. (7) METHOD: Testing requested employs a method generally accepted within the relevant scientific community. (8) DELAY: Motion is not made solely for the purpose of delay.

  61. Uriah Courtney

  62. TESTING AT TRIAL (2005) – San Diego Sheriff’s Department • Amylase was detected in the crotch of the underwear • DNA analysis performed • Debris observed on toothpicks • DNA analysis performed

  63. THE CONVICTION

  64. CONCESSION & JOINT STIPULATION

  65. POST‐CONVICTION DNA TESTING CALIFORNIA INNOCENCE PROJECT

  66. RESULTS  Fingernail scrapings ‐ Victim  Vaginal swabs ‐ Victim  Underwear – 1 allele

  67. STR RESULTS FROM THE SHIRT

  68. ISOLATING THE PERPETRATOR PROFILE

  69. CALIFORNIA INNOCENCE PROJECT

  70.  THE HIT

  71. 16 years later

  72. Ronald Cotton – Served 10 years

  73. Richard Jones – Served 17 years

Recommend


More recommend