AND MIDL OF F I CI AL PL AN RE VI E W COUNCIL PRE SE NT AT ION Ma y 31, 2017 T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Co nte nts 1. Ho w to re a d the dra ft Offic ia l Pla n 2. Pro c e ss fo r dra fting the Offic ia l Pla n 3. Disc ussio n o f the dra ft Offic ia l Pla n - Sc he dule s - Po lic ie s 4. Co nsulta tio n Pro c e ss 5. Ne xt Ste ps T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Ho w to r e ad this Offic ia l Pla n 1. 1. T he Offic ia l Pla n is a c o mple x do c ume nt whe re he Vision is linke d to the Guiding Pr inc iple s , T whic h a re linke d to the Polic y F k . T he r ame wor re ve rse is a lso true - e a c h po lic y is suppo rte d b y o ne o r mo re Guiding Princ iple s, whic h a re , in turn, suppo rte d b y T he Visio n. 2. 2. All planning de c isions within the T own will be m to the Offic ial Plan . I n e xpe c te d to c onfor c o nside ring a ny pla nning ma tte r, a ll o f the a pplic a b le po lic ie s o f the Offic ia l Pla n sha ll b e a ppro pria te ly c o nside re d. T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
3. 1. T he spe c ific wo rding in the Offic ia l Pla n is e ithe r de finitive (will, shall) OR disc r e tionar y (may, should) . T he use o f de finitive o r disc re tio na ry la ng ua g e ha s b e e n c a re fully c o nside re d in this Pla n to pro vide the a ppro pria te le ve l o f g uida nc e o r fle xib ility in the inte rpre ta tio n o f the po lic ie s. 4. 2. I t is impo rta nt to re me mb e r tha t the Offic ia l Pla n is the do c ume nt tha t “se ts the stage ” for gr owth and de ve lopme nt in Midla nd o ve r the ne xt 20 ye a rs. I t is no t a lo ne - it is re q uire d to c onfor m with the Gro wth Pla n a nd the Co unty o f Simc o e Offic ia l Pla n, a nd it must b e c onsiste nt with the Pro vinc ia l Po lic y Sta te me nt. T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Ho w wa s the ne w Offic ial Plan dra fte d? I ssue s, Visio n a nd Princ iple s de rive d thro ug h sta ke ho lde r c o nsulta tio n a nd ve tte d thro ug h the Ste e ring Co mmitte e a nd sta ff Pla nning I ssue re po rts we re inte g ra te d into the po lic y fra me wo rk Re vie w o f e xisting te xt with re fe re nc e to the Gro wth Pla n, Pro vinc ia l Po lic y Sta te me nt a nd Co unty Offic ia l Pla n Co nside re d “b e st pra c tic e s” a nd inno va tive a ppro a c he s fro m e xpe rie nc e in o the r jurisdic tio ns T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Wha t is in the ne w Offic ial Plan ? ION 3.3 E c o no mic De ve lo pme nt 5.5 Ro a d s 1.0 INT RODUCT 3.4 Cultura l He rita g e 5.6 T ra nspo rta tio n Syste m 1.1 Purpo se Impro ve me nts IONS 1.2 Co nte xt 4.0 L AND USE DE SIGNAT URE 6.0 MUNICIPAL INF RAST RUCT 1.3 Ba sis o f the Offic ia l Pla n 4.1 Intro d uc tio n 6.1 Intro d uc tio n 1.4 T he Visio n fo r Mid la nd 4.2 E mplo yme nt Distric ts 6.2 Wa te r Supply 1.5 Guid ing Princ iple s 4.3 Ne ig hb o urho o d Distric ts 6.3 Wa ste Wa te r T re a tme nt 1.6 Suc c e ssful Co mmunity Princ iple s 4.4 Inte nsific a tio n Distric ts 6.4 Sto rm Wa te r Ma na g e me nt 4.5 Gre e nla nd s 2.0 GROWT H MANAGE ME NT 6.5 Utilitie s a nd 4.6 Rura l Are a s 2.1 Po pula tio n a nd E mplo yme nt T e le c o mmunic a tio ns F o re c a sts 5.0 T RANSPORT AT ION 6.6 Gre e n E ne rg y F a c ilitie s 2.2 Pla nning fo r Gro wth in a n Urb a n 5.1 Intro d uc tio n 6.7 Pipe line s Struc ture 5.2 Ob je c tive s 6.8 So lid Wa ste Ma na g e me nt 3.0 GE NE RAL DE VE L OPME NT POL ICIE S 5.3 Ac tive T ra nspo rta tio n 3.1 A Suc c e ssful Co mmunity 5.4 Pub lic T ra nsit 3.2 Ho using T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Wha t is in the ne w Offic ial Plan ? 7.12 Pro pe rty Ma inte na nc e 8.3 Ac c e sso ry Use s 7.0 IMPL E ME NT AT ION AND a nd Oc c upa nc y By-la w ADMINIST RAT ION 8.4 De finitio ns 7.13 Bro wnfie ld De ve lo pme nt 7.1 Intro d uc tio n 7.14 De mo litio n Co ntro l 7.2 T he Offic ia l Pla n ist of Sc he dule s L 7.15 E xe mptio ns fro m Re q uire d 7.3 By-la ws Sc he dule A – Gro wth Are a s Pa rking Re q uire me nts 7.4 Site Pla n Co ntro l Sc he dule B – Urb a n Struc ture 7.16 Munic ipa l F ina nc e s 7.5 T he Sub d ivisio n o f L a nd Sc he dule C – L a nd Use 7.17 Munic ipa l L a nd Ac q uisitio n 7.6 T he Co mmunity Pla nning Sc he dule C1 – Mid la nd Ba y L a nd ing 7.18 Pa rkla nd De d ic a tio n Pe rmit Syste m Sc he dule D – Ac tive T ra nspo rta tio n 7.19 Pub lic Invo lve me nt a nd 7.7 De ve lo pme nt Appro va ls Co nsulta tio n a nd Co mple te Applic a tio ns – Ro a d s Sc he dule E ION 8.0 INT E RPRE T AT 7.8 Co mmunity Impro ve me nt – Infra struc ture Sc he dule F 8.1 L a nd Use Bo und a rie s a nd 7.9 E xisting a nd No n-c o nfo rming Sc he dule G – So urc e Pro te c tio n Ro a d s L a nd Use s 8.2 F ig ure s a nd Qua ntitie s 7.10 Co mmitte e o f Ad justme nt 7.11 Build ing By-la w T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Po lic y hig hlig hts: Natur al itage Syste m He r • T he da ta tha t wa s use d is the only da ta to use – sta nda rd a c ro ss the Pro vinc e • T he po lic y fra me wo rk is str ong and base d on sc ie nc e • F ra me wo rk a llo ws fo r re fine me nt throug h the de ve lopme nt a pprova l proc e ss • F unda me nta l e le me nt o f Onta rio pla nning is tha t munic ipa litie s prote c t na tura l he rita g e re sourc e s T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Po lic y hig hlig hts: Natur al itage Syste m He r • I nte ntio n is to re stric t e nvironme nta l da ma g e c a use d b y future de ve lo pme nt – no t re stric t c urre nt use a nd e njo yme nt o f la nd • Po lic ie s re c o g nize e xisting a pprova ls (4.5.3.4d) • Po lic ie s re c o g nize e xisting de ve lopme nt (4.5.3.5) • Sig nific a nt support from c ommunity to pro te c t na tura l a re a s – c ritic a l e le me nt o f Midla nd’ s c ha ra c te r T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Po lic y hig hlig hts: E mployme nt Distr ic ts • Pro vinc ia l po lic y re q uire me nt to prote c t mployme nt Are a s fo r the lo ng -te rm, E c ha ng e re q uire s MCR • Onc e la nd de sig na te d E mplo yme nt Are a is lo st to re de sig na tio n, it is g e ne ra lly impossible to g e t ba c k • More fle xibility pro vide d fo r E mplo yme nt L a nds – No MCR re q uire d • Muc h o f the E mplo yme nt Are a fro m the e xisting OP ha s be e n re de sig na te d T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
E xisting Offic ia l Pla n Ne w Offic ia l Pla n Sc he dule A: L and Use Sc he dule C: L and Use T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Po lic y hig hlig hts: Suc c e ssful Communitie s • I de ntifie s the c o mpo ne nts o f a suc c e ssful c o mmunity to b e c o nside re d in c onjunc tion with the othe r se c tions o f the OP • Po lic ie s ha ve shifte d from ta rg e t- ba se d to obje c tive - ba se d to pro vide mo re fle xib ility T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Ne w Pro vinc ia l Gr owth Plan • Ne w Growth Pla n for the Gre a te r Golde n Horse shoe wa s re le a se d Ma y 18, 2017 a nd will c o me into e ffe c t July 1, 2017 • T he Co nsulta nt T e a m, T o wn Sta ff a nd Simc o e Co unty Sta ff will wo rk to g e the r to de te rmine the implic a tions for this OPR proc e ss T he Pla nning Pa rtne rship | Munic ipa l Pla nning Se rvic e s | PL AN B Na tura l He rita g e | urb a nMe tric s
Recommend
More recommend