Confidentiality, Non Disclosure and Non Disparagement Provisions p - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presenting a live 90 ‐ minute webinar with interactive Q&A Confidentiality, Non ‐ Disclosure and Non ‐ Disparagement Provisions p g in Employment Agreements Drafting Enforceable Provisions to Protect Proprietary Information and Corporate Reputation THURS DAY, AUGUS T 22, 2013 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific T d Today’s faculty features: ’ f l f Ashley S teiner Kelly, Partner, Arnall Golden Gregory , Atlanta tanford, Jr., Attorney, SIO Law Group , Atlanta E. Ray S The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10 .

Tips for Optimal Quality S S ound Quality d Q lit If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-570-7602 and enter your PIN when prompted Otherwise please send us a chat or e mail when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@ straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Qualit y To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again press the F11 key again.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: • In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location attendees at your location • Click the S END button beside the box If you have purchased S trafford CLE processing services, you must confirm your participation by completing and submitting an Official Record of Attendance (CLE Form). Y ou may obtain your CLE form by going to the program page and selecting the appropriate form in the PROGRAM MATERIALS box at the top right corner. If you'd like to purchase CLE credit processing, it is available for a fee. For additional information about CLE credit processing, go to our website or call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

Program Materials If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: • Click on the + sign next to “ Conference Materials” in the middle of the left- hand column on your screen hand column on your screen. • Click on the tab labeled “ Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. • Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. • Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure and Non- Co de t a ty, o sc osu e a d o Disparagement Provisions in Employment Agreements p oy e g ee e s Presented by: Ashley Steiner Kelly y y 171 17th Street NW, Ste 2100 Atlanta, GA 30363-1031 ashley.kelly@agg.com

Confidentiality, Non ‐ Disclosure and Non Disparagement Provisions Non ‐ Disparagement Provisions Recent Regulatory Trends Recent Regulatory Trends  NLRB Rulings  EEOC Enforcement 6

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings Legal Context: National Labor Relations Act Legal Context: National Labor Relations Act  Purpose: To protect employees’ ability to engage in activities such as unionizing and bargaining collectively i i i h i i i d b i i ll i l by equalizing bargaining power between employers and employees. NLRA § 1; 29 U.S.C. § 151. p y  Section 7: “Employees shall have the right to self ‐ organization, to form, join or assist labor organizations, to bargain collecti ely through representati es of their o bargain collectively through representatives of their own n choosing and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid and protection…” NLRA § 7; 29 U.S.C. § 157. 7

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings What is “Concerted Activity”? What is Concerted Activity ?  An employee’s activity is concerted if the employee: An employee s activity is concerted if the employee: – Acts with or on the authority of other employees – Seeks to initiate, induce, or prepare for group action – Brings “truly group complaints” to the attention of management  Mere personal griping is not concerted, protected activity   Activity must concern a term or condition of employment Activity must concern a term or condition of employment (wages, hours, working conditions) 8

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings  Million Dollar Question: How does the NLRA relate to non ‐ disclosure and non ‐ disparagement provisions?  Answer: The NLRB has recently turned its attention to reviewing employers’ work rules to determine whether they unlawfully interfere or prohibit “concerted activity” h l f ll i f hibi “ d i i ”  Section 8: “It shall be an unfair labor practice for an p employer– (1) to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7 of this Act ” NLRA § 8 29 U S C § 158(a)(1) section 7 of this Act. NLRA § 8; 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). 9

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings The Test: A work rule is unlawful if it would “unreasonably The Test: A work rule is unlawful if it would unreasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights.” This happens when the work rule:  Explicitly prohibits protected activity ( e.g. , “no unions p y p p y ( g , allowed”);  Would be interpreted by an employee to restrict protected activity; ti it  Was promulgated in response to union activity;  Has actually been applied to restrict protected activity. a a ua y ee app ie o e i p o e e a i i y 10

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings Recent Case Studies: Recent Case Studies: American Medical Response of Conn. (2010)  Employee criticized supervisor on Facebook  Terminated for violating social media policy that prohibited making disparaging, discriminatory, or defamatory making disparaging discriminatory or defamatory comments about the company, superiors, co ‐ workers, and/or competitors  NLRB found policy to be overbroad and unlawful  Could prohibit employees from discussing terms and conditions of employment conditions of employment 11

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings Recent Case Studies: Recent Case Studies: DirecTV U.S (2013)  NLRB invalidated four of DirecTV’s policies – Media relations – Communicating with law enforcement Communicating with law enforcement – Non ‐ disclosure – Company information  Board held that policies were overbroad, vague and failed to make clear that employees could engage in concerted activity protected by Section 7 y p y 12

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings And now And now . . . Quicken Loans, Inc. (June 2013)  Employees required to sign an Employment Agreement Employees required to sign an Employment Agreement  “Proprietary/Confidential Information” clause: employees must maintain in strictest confidence all confidential information, including information about coworkers  “Non ‐ Disparagement” clause: employees are prohibited from criticizing ridiculing disparaging or defaming from criticizing, ridiculing, disparaging, or defaming Quicken or its products, services, policies, directors, officers, shareholders, or employees 13

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings Quicken Loans Inc (June 2013) Quicken Loans, Inc. (June 2013)  Garza, a non ‐ union mortgage banker, resigned from , g g , g Quicken in 2011  Quicken sued Garza for violating various restrictive covenants in the Agreement, including the no contact/no t i th A t i l di th t t/ raiding and noncompete provisions  Garza filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB Garza filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB 14

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings Quicken Loans Inc (June 2013) Quicken Loans, Inc. (June 2013)  ALJ: “The line between lawful and unlawful J restrictions is very thin and often difficult to discern.”  Explained that the appropriate inquiry is “whether the rules would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights,” regardless of whether exercise of their Section 7 rights, regardless of whether the rules had ever been enforced 15

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings Quicken Loans Inc (June 2013) Quicken Loans, Inc. (June 2013)  A ALJ: Proprietary/Confidential Information provision /C f d l I f unlawful because it prohibited the disclosure of all information relating to personnel, including “personal g p , g p information of co ‐ workers … such as home phone numbers, cell phone numbers, addresses and email addresses ” addresses. 16

NLRB Rulings NLRB Rulings Quicken Loans Inc (June 2013) Quicken Loans, Inc. (June 2013)  A ALJ: Non ‐ Disparagement provision unlawful because l f l b “[w]ithin certain limits, employees are allowed to criticize their employer and its products as part of their p y p p Section 7 rights, and employees sometime do so in appealing to the public, or to their fellow employees, in order to gain their support ” order to gain their support. 17