comments
play

Comments: Long-Term Follow-Up of Supported Employment Recipients 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comments: Long-Term Follow-Up of Supported Employment Recipients 1 B O B W E A T H E R S S O C I A L S E C U R I T Y A D M I N I S T R A T I O N O C T O B E R 3 0 , 2 0 1 4 Policy Relevance 2 A significant share of SSDI beneficiaries


  1. Comments: Long-Term Follow-Up of Supported Employment Recipients 1 B O B W E A T H E R S S O C I A L S E C U R I T Y A D M I N I S T R A T I O N O C T O B E R 3 0 , 2 0 1 4

  2. Policy Relevance 2 A significant share of SSDI beneficiaries and SSI recipients have mental health conditions  Among all DI beneficiaries, primary diagnosis: mood disorders (14.1%), schizophrenic and  other psychotic disorders (5.1%) Among all SSI recipients ages 18-64, primary diagnosis: mood disorders (16.5%),  schizophrenic and other psychotic disorders (8.9%) SSDI beneficiaries with mental health conditions tend to be younger and stay on the program  longer Relatively lower incidence rates indicate longer stay on program  Among all DI awardees: Mood Disorders (9.6%), Schizophrenic and other psychotic  disorders (2.2%) Among all SSI recipients ages 18-64: Mood Disorders (13.0%), Schizophrenic and other  psychotic disorders (5.6%) Providing services and supports to individuals with mental impairments may:  improve functioning, employment, and earnings; and  reduce reliance on SSDI and SSI programs.  A unique feature of the Cook et al paper is the analysis of long-term outcomes of individuals  who received Supported Employment services

  3. Paper’s Key Findings 3  Among group who received EIDP SE, over 13 yr follow-up:  no statistically significant difference in any reported earnings (adjusted OR = 1.27, p=.253)  more likely to ever be suspended from SSI/DI due to work (adjusted OR = 2.05, p=.024)  more total earnings (average about $3,000 more, p=.092)  More likely to collect SSDI benefits, less likely to collect SSI payments  Person-month panel regressions tend to show larger effects  Result of Supported Employment or sample selection?  Uses subsample who agreed to additional survey and to merge SSA records, treatment group member who benefited more likely to agree?  Persistence of the SE effect on employment is somewhat surprising given experience with other demonstrations  Providing additional information on baseline characteristics of each group might be useful in assessing possible selection bias

  4. Comparison to MHTS 4  SSA/Westat Mental Health Treatment Study (MHTS) included: access to supported employment (SE) services and systematic medication management  (SMM) services begun in November 2006 and ended July 2010  included 2,238 SSDI beneficiaries in 23 study sites throughout the U. S.  random assignment of volunteers to either a treatment group or a control group  primary goal was to examine impact on competitive employment   MHTS Findings: positive impact on health and healthcare outcomes ( reduction in hospital days was about  one day per year, or approximately $1,800 per year per person); positive impact on employment during 24 month intervention period(61% v. 40% control  group); positive impact on monthly earnings, conditional on having earnings ($251.12 vs. $227.93) ;  no effect on SGA (SGA amount was $900/month in 2007, $1000/month in 2010); and  no effect on benefit suspense/termination   Goal of competitive employment may not translate into reduced reliance on benefits

  5. What Next? 5  MHTS and EIDP long-term outcomes analyses:  both focused on SSDI beneficiaries and SSI recipients  application and program participation might have negative effects on labor market outcomes  Can a focus earlier in the impairment process (before DI/SSI receipt) increase employment, earnings, and economic well-being?  Is the SE focus on competitive employment too limiting?  should the focus be on Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA)? or  maximizing a person’s employment and earnings potential?

  6. Opportunities to Build on SE Findings 6  Early intervention demonstration authority:  Focus on SE services to denied applicants with mental impairments?  Focus on SE services on SSI/DI applicants with mental impairments before SSA disability determination?  Affordable Care Act (ACA) Health Homes:  ACA established Health Homes to coordinate care for people with Medicaid who have chronic conditions  Conditions include “one serious and persistent mental health condition”  Health Homes providers integrate and coordinate all primary, acute, behavioral health, and long-term services and supports to treat the whole person  Supports could include Supported Employment services?  ACA expands Medicaid to those with incomes up to 138% of poverty line  State Medicaid “buy - in” option may cover individuals with a disability and incomes up to 400% of poverty line

Recommend


More recommend