city of prattville wastewater department
play

City of Prattville Wastewater Department Sewer Cost of Service Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

City of Prattville Wastewater Department Sewer Cost of Service Study 12 months ending September, 2014 Presented February 2, 2016 Jim Marshall | Jackson Thornton Utilities Consultants Typical Objectives of Rate Study 1. Revenue Stability and


  1. City of Prattville Wastewater Department Sewer Cost of Service Study 12 months ending September, 2014 Presented February 2, 2016 Jim Marshall | Jackson Thornton Utilities Consultants

  2. Typical Objectives of Rate Study 1. Revenue Stability and Sufficiency 2. Fairness and Equity • Fair is related to cross subsidies • Equity is related to Price=Cost 3. Ability to Pay 4. Simplicity (Admin & Cust Understanding) 5. Defendable 2

  3. Overview of Process 1. Determine Revenue Requirements • How much does the system need to operate? 2. Develop Revenue Requirements by Rate Class • How much do I need to recover by rate class? 3. Develop COS Rates and Design Acceptable Rates • How do I best recover the needed revenues? 4. Implement Rate Changes 3

  4. Cash Method Revenue Requirement TOTAL REV. REQ. Operations & Maintenance Expense $ 2,361,938 Plus: Debt Service $ 1,338,845 Plus: Rate Funded Capital $ 942,233 Total Revenue Requirement $ 4,643,016 Less: Other Revenue $ 32,233 Rate Requirement $ 4,610,782 **Debt Service includes $1,200,000 of future debt service. 4

  5. Components of Revenue Requirement Revenue ¡Requirement Rate ¡Funded ¡ Capital 20% Operations ¡& ¡ Maintenance ¡ Expense 51% Debt ¡Service 29% 5

  6. Revenue Requirement Rev. ¡Req. ¡by ¡Rate ¡Class $5,000,000 ¡ $4,500,000 ¡ $4,000,000 ¡ $3,500,000 ¡ $3,000,000 ¡ $2,500,000 ¡ $2,000,000 ¡ $1,500,000 ¡ $1,000,000 ¡ $500,000 ¡ $-­‑ Total Res-­‑I Res-­‑O Com-­‑I Com-­‑O Ind Operations ¡& ¡Maintenance ¡Expense Debt ¡Service Rate ¡Funded ¡Capital 6

  7. Recovery by Class Recovery ¡by ¡Rate ¡Class 140% 120% 100% 84% 79% 78% 77% 76% 80% 72% 60% 40% 20% 0% Total Res-­‑I Res-­‑O Com-­‑I Com-­‑O Ind Total Res-I Res-O Com-I Com-O Ind Total Revenue $ 3,635,024 $ 2,697,358 $ 22,737 $ 867,959 $ 31,054 $ 15,915 7 Over/(Under) Recovery $ (1,007,992) $ (733,949) $ (4,232) $ (253,965) $ (9,543) $ (6,304)

  8. Recommendations – 5 Year Plan ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT ADDITIONAL REVENUE Customer Volumetric Customer Volumetric Total yr 1 $ 1.00 $ 0.25 yr 1 $ 123,279 $ 216,652 $ 339,931 yr 2 $ 1.00 $ 0.20 yr 2 $ 123,279 $ 173,322 $ 296,601 yr 3 $ 1.00 $ 0.15 yr 3 $ 123,279 $ 129,991 $ 253,270 yr 4 $ 1.00 $ 0.10 yr 4 $ 123,279 $ 86,661 $ 209,940 yr 5 $ 1.00 $ 0.05 yr 5 $ 123,279 $ 43,330 $ 166,609 $ 5.00 $ 0.75 $ 616,395 $ 649,957 $ 1,266,352 8

  9. Residential-Inside Rate Curve – Full Implementation Cost of Service Current Rate Proposed Rate Difference $ 13.84 Customer Charge $ 11.00 $ 16.00 $ 5.00 $ 2.99 All Usage $ 2.55 $ 3.30 $ 0.75 Res-Inside Cost Curve $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $/kGal $10.00 $5.00 $- 1 2 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 20 Usage COS Total $/kGal Current Rate $/kGal Proposed Rate $/kGal 9

  10. Residential Rate Impact – Full Implementation Monthly Current Usage COS Rates Current Rates Proposed Rates Change Daily Change $/kGal Proposed $/kGal 1 $ 16.84 $ 13.55 $ 19.30 $ 5.75 $ 0.19 $ 13.55 $ 19.30 2 $ 19.83 $ 16.10 $ 22.60 $ 6.50 $ 0.22 $ 8.05 $ 11.30 4 $ 25.81 $ 21.20 $ 29.20 $ 8.00 $ 0.27 $ 5.30 $ 7.30 5 $ 28.80 $ 23.75 $ 32.50 $ 8.75 $ 0.29 $ 4.75 $ 6.50 6 $ 31.80 $ 26.30 $ 35.80 $ 9.50 $ 0.32 $ 4.38 $ 5.97 8 $ 37.78 $ 31.40 $ 42.40 $ 11.00 $ 0.37 $ 3.93 $ 5.30 10 $ 43.76 $ 36.50 $ 49.00 $ 12.50 $ 0.42 $ 3.65 $ 4.90 12 $ 49.75 $ 41.60 $ 55.60 $ 14.00 $ 0.47 $ 3.47 $ 4.63 15 $ 58.72 $ 49.25 $ 65.50 $ 16.25 $ 0.54 $ 3.28 $ 4.37 20 $ 73.69 $ 62.00 $ 82.00 $ 20.00 $ 0.67 $ 3.10 $ 4.10 Average Usage 5,396 10

Recommend


More recommend