chroniques un nouveau label
play

chroniques : un nouveau label Pourquoi la maladie coronaire stable - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Les syndromes coronaires chroniques : un nouveau label Pourquoi la maladie coronaire stable n'existe plus ? Stphane Manzo-Silberman Service de Cardiologie, Hpital Lariboisire, Paris Universit Paris, UMRS 942 D CLARATION DE LIENS


  1. Les syndromes coronaires chroniques : un nouveau label Pourquoi la maladie coronaire stable n'existe plus ? Stéphane Manzo-Silberman Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris Université Paris, UMRS 942

  2. D ÉCLARATION DE LIENS D’INTÉRÊT AVEC LA PRÉSENTATION Speaker ’ s name : Stéphane Manzo-Silberman • Pas de liens d’intérêts en relation avec la présentation

  3. Definition or concept?  CAD= pathological process, continuum  Atherosclerotic accumulation  Obstructive or non obstructive  Active process: CV risk factors  Can be modified: stabilized or decreased – Lifestyle modification – Pharmacological therapy – Invasive intervention  Periods of unstability

  4. Dynamic CAD CAD CCS ACS

  5. CCS in 6 scenarii suspected CAD and ‘stable’ anginal symptoms, and/or dyspnoea CCV new onset of heart asymptomatic subjects failure (HF) or left in whom CAD is ventricular (LV) detected at screening dysfunction and suspected CAD asymptomatic and symptomatic patients angina and suspected with stabilized vasospastic or symptoms <1 year after microvascular disease an ACS, or patients with recent revascularization asymptomatic and symptomatic patients >1 year after initial diagnosis or revascularization

  6. Suspected CAD and ‘stable’ anginal symptoms, and/or dyspnoea CCV

  7. Suspected CAD and ‘ stable ’ anginal symptoms, and/or dyspnoea CCV

  8. Suspected CAD and ‘stable’ anginal symptoms, and/or dyspnoea CCV

  9. Suspected CAD and ‘ stable ’ anginal symptoms, and/or dyspnoea CCV  Stable vs Unstable….  UNSTABLE  ACS: – as rest angina >20 min – crescendo angina, i.e. previous angina, which progressively increases in severity and intensity, and at a lower threshold, over a short period of time. – new-onset angina <2 months onset of moderate-to-severe angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade II or III )  CCS: new-onset angina with heavy exertion

  10. Suspected CAD and ‘stable’ anginal symptoms, and/or dyspnoea CCV

  11. New onset of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and suspected CAD  HFpEF or HFrEF  History  Physical examination  ECG  Imaging: TTE  Lab  Management: – Pharmacological – Revascularization

  12. Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with stabilized symptoms <1 year after an ACS, or patients with recent revascularization  Monitoring asymptomatic and symptomatic patients  > 2 visits the 1 st year of Follow up with stabilized symptoms <1 year after an ACS, or patients with  LV function 8-12 weeks after intervention recent revascularization  Non invasive assessment of myocardial ischaemia

  13. Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients >1 year after initial diagnosis or revascularization  Assess patient’s risk  Annual evaluation  Lab tests: lipid profil, renal function, CBC +/- biomarkers: every 1 or 2 years  Unexplained reduction systolic LV function->imaging  Silent ischaemia: stress imaging

  14. Angina and suspected vasospastic or microvascular disease  Angina and NOCAD: increased risk  Diagnosis impaired: – Stenoses with mild or moderate angiographic severity, or diffuse coronary narrowing, – Disorders affecting the microcirculatory domain – Dynamic stenoses of epicardial vessels caused by coronary spasm or intramyocardial bridges

  15. Angina and suspected vasospastic or microvascular disease

  16. Angina and suspected vasospastic or microvascular disease  Microvascular dysfunction: – IMR ≥ 25 or CFR < 2.0  Vasospastic angina – Epicardial: Symptoms + ECG+ severe vasoconstriction – Microvascular spasm: Symptoms ± ECG+ 0 vasoconstriction  CorMiCA: – 151 patients randomized: stratified medical treatment based on testing vs standard care – Testing: CFR, IMR, Acetylcholine testing1 year: significant difference in Angina scores

  17. Asymptomatic subjects in whom CAD is detected at screening

  18. Asymptomatic subjects in whom CAD is detected at screening: WOMEN  Difference in symptoms  Precise estimation of pretest probability  Weakness of FRS, SCORE  Implementation with: – Specific risks – Calcium score  Stress TTE exercise or Dobutamine

  19. Take Home Message  CCS: different evolutionary phases of CAD, excluding situations in which an acute coronary artery thrombosis dominates the clinical presentation  CCS: continuum of ischemic disease patterns from microvascular dysfunction to epicardial obstruction  Step by step : – Pretest probability – Risk stratification – Diagnosis approach – Risk for future events

  20. Merci de votre attention

Recommend


More recommend