cd38 and ceramide enriched membrane platforms in bovine
play

CD38 and Ceramide-Enriched Membrane Platforms in Bovine Coronary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CD38 and Ceramide-Enriched Membrane Platforms in Bovine Coronary Myocytes July 31, 2008 Matt Childrey Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology Medical College of Virginia Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia Summer Program


  1. CD38 and Ceramide-Enriched Membrane Platforms in Bovine Coronary Myocytes July 31, 2008 Matt Childrey Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology Medical College of Virginia Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia Summer Program for Undergraduate Research 2008

  2. Background • Ceramide-enriched lipid rafts microdomains ceramide sphingomyelin ASM de novo • Oxotremorine CD38 • • 45 kDa

  3. Hypothesis • Lipid raft membrane microdomains are involved in oxotremorine-induced CD38 activation in bovine coronary myocytes. cADPR hydrolysis Calcium CD38 oxotremorine release Lipid raft platform vasoconstriction

  4. Methods •DMT Myograph: tension recording studies of fresh bovine myocardial vasculature •Vasoconstrictor: Oxotremorine (20 uM, 40 uM, 60 uM, 80 uM) •Drugs: Methyl-ß-cyclodextrin (1mM), desipramine (0.1 mM), filipin (1µg/mL), nicotinamide ( 6mM), treated for 15 minutes

  5. Results Oxotremorine-induced Contraction 1000 800 % relative contraction 600 400 200 0 -200 0 uM 20 uM 40 uM 60 uM 80 uM oxotremorine control (n=29) mcd (n=29) desipramine (n=13) filipin (n=16) nicotinamide (n=22) Fig. 1. Effect of LR inhibitors on oxotremorine-induced constriction

  6. Results Methyl-ß-cyclodextrin vs. Control Oxotremorine-induced Contraction (n=29) 700 600 500 % relative contraction 400 300 200 100 0 0 uM 20 uM 40 uM 60 uM 80 uM oxotremorine control mcd

  7. Results Desipramine vs. Control Oxotremorine-induced Contraction 500 400 % relative contraction 300 200 100 0 -100 0 uM 20 uM 40 uM 60 uM 80 uM oxotremorine control (n=29) desipramine (n=13)

  8. Results Filipin vs. Control Oxotremorine-induced Contraction 500 400 % relative contraction 300 200 100 0 0 uM 20 uM 40 uM 60 uM 80 uM oxotremorine control (n=29) filipin (n=16)

  9. Results Nicotinamide vs. Control Oxotremorine-induced Contraction 1000 800 % relative contraction 600 400 200 0 0 uM 20 uM 40 uM 60 uM 80 uM oxotremorine control (n=29) nicotinamide (n=22)

  10. Results

  11. Discussion • CD38 as receptor and enzyme • ASM inhibition • Role of ceramide in CD38 activation? • Raft aggregation and oxotremorine stimulation

  12. Questions and Future Directions • Inhibitor concentrations • Oxotremorine dosage levels • Myograph-specific conditions?

  13. Acknowledgements • Dr.Li and Dr.Zou - special thanks for making this summer possible • VCU Pharmacology & Toxicology

Recommend


More recommend