23/12/2017 Catalin Radu SANIS/1 – Safety Stream Deputy Director – Safety Montreal, 14 December 2017 Air Navigation Bureau – ICAO 1 STATE OF AVIATION SAFETY STATE OF AVIATION SAFETY Accident rate stable, with 2016 the lowest ever recorded Fatalities showed a spike during 2014, and then recovered in 2015 & 2016 All regional accident rates are less than double the Global Accident Rate Accident rate stable, with 2016 the lowest ever recorded No CFIT accidents in 2015 and 2016 Fatalities showed a spike during 2014, and then recovered in 2015 & 2016 No CFIT accidents in 2015 and 2016 All regional accident rates are less than double the Global Accident Rate Source: 2017 Safety Report (https://www.icao.int/safety/Pages/Safety-Report.aspx) 23 December 2017 2 1
23/12/2017 ���������������������������� ������ �������������������� ��������������������� ����� ��������������������������� Risks/barriers to achieve our goal • Effective Implementation of SARPs • ICAO’s Safety priorities: Operational Risks • Current and emerging issues 7 23 December 2017 2
23/12/2017 Effective Implementation of State Safety Oversight World Average: 64,97% Global average increase of 1.5% per year* Effective implementation (%) results through USOAP CMA * Based on the world average of EI from the period 2011 (60.17) to 2016 (64.74) 8 23 December 2017 The Current Situation • Some States are not and may never be able to, at least not in a cost-effective way fulfil all their aviation safety oversight obligations adequately • Most RSOOs have been ineffective in delivering the mandated support to States, while the industry is growing, changing and becoming more complex • This will increase the gap and have a negative impact on global safety � Different regulatory systems, inefficient overlapping auditing and certification programmes require a rethink of current safety oversight principles 6 3
23/12/2017 Global RSOO Forum Outcomes • Global Strategy and Action Plan for the Improvement of Regional Safety Oversight Organizations (RSOOs) and the Establishment of a Global System for the Provision of Safety Oversight – Improve and strengthen RSOOs – RSOO evaluation, individual RSOO gap analyses & RSOO manual revision – Establish an RSOO cooperative platform – Agreed on RSOO “Levels of Empowerment” → Develop and implement a global aviation safety oversight system (GASOS) – study group & feasibility study 7 RSOOs (including COSCAPs) → RSOOs need to improve, including more effective delegation and efficient financial sustainability RSOOs COSCAPs Future MENA RSOO 8 4
23/12/2017 Levels of Empowerment of Safety Oversight Providers • Level 1 - Advice and Coordination without formal agreement for task delegation • Level 2 - Operational Assistance through a formal binding agreement with a State or group of States • Level 3 - Formal and Legally Binding delegation from State to conduct technical services and issue certificates, licenses and approvals Existing Regional Aviation Safety Mechanisms Safety Safety Regional Safety Regional Safety Implementation/ Implementation/ Oversight Oversight Accident Investigation Accident Investigation Promotion/ Promotion/ Organizations Organizations Collaboration Collaboration (RSOOs) (RSOOs) COSCAPs & other COSCAPs & other Other Regional Safety Other Regional Safety Institutionalized Institutionalized Regional Civil Aviation Regional Civil Aviation Regional Aviation Regional Aviation Regional Accident Regional Accident providers providers Oversight Systems Oversight Systems RSOOs RSOOs Authority Authority Safety Groups Safety Groups Investigation Investigation (RASGs) (RASGs) Organizations (RAIO) Organizations (RAIO) (Level 1 & 2) (Level 1 & 2) (Level 1) (Level 1) (Levels 1, 2 & 3) (Levels 1, 2 & 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) • Project structure • Based on MoC or • Legal act • Legal act • Steering agreement • Permanent • Permanent Committee • Dependent on • Autonomous • Autonomous • Time Limited ICAO or States • Legal personality • Legal personality • Assisting States • Assistance and • Oversight • Oversight build capacity oversight functions in functions on functions in cooperation with behalf of States cooperation with States States 10 5
23/12/2017 Levels of Empowerment Examples (ICAO Evaluation of RSOOs Report Nov. 2017) Regional Safety Regional Safety Oversight Oversight Organizations Organizations (RSOOs) (RSOOs) COSCAPs & COSCAPs & Other Regional Safety Other Regional Safety Institutionalized Institutionalized Regional Civil Aviation Regional Civil Aviation Consultants Consultants Oversight Systems Oversight Systems RSOOs RSOOs Authority Authority (Level 1 & 2) (Level 1 & 2) (Level 1) (Level 1) (Levels 1, 2 & 3) (Levels 1, 2 & 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) � SRVSOP � ASSA-AC, � ECCAA � COSCAPs, AFI- CIS (Level 1) BAGASOO, Examples � Bureau Veritas CASSOA, (Level 2) CASSOS, iSASO, PASO (Level 1) � ACSA, AAMAC (Level 2) � EASA, IAC (Level 3) 11 Global Aviation Safety Oversight System (GASOS) • Using the USOAP methodology, a GASOS would offer a programme for measuring the competence of safety oversight providers to provide safety oversight functions on behalf of States. • In addition to making regional mechanisms more effective and efficient in fulfilling their mandate, the GASOS would help provide reliable and flexible alternative options to States’ developing their own capacity to carry-out all safety oversight functions. 12 6
23/12/2017 The concept Safety Oversight Providers Apply •RSOOs GASOS States •State CAAs •Other Service Providers Recognition of functions 13 Concept endorsed by the: Global Aviation Safety Oversight System (GASOS) A A B RSOP RSOP RSOP ICAO recognized C D safety oversight RSOP RSOP provider (RSOP) F E F RSOP RSOP RSOP G D RSOP RSOP State Oversight ICAO Library Audit Results 7
23/12/2017 GASOS Objectives • ICAO responsible for establishing and maintaining a registry of competent safety oversight providers and the tasks and functions that they provide • Regional mechanisms and safety oversight providers to demonstrate competence in the functions that they offer to provide States, in order to qualify as an ICAO evaluated, recognised and registered safety oversight provider • Linked to next edition of the GASP and future evolution of the USOAP ; also considering CAA inspector qualifications • Strengthen regional safety oversight support mechanisms to form a global aviation safety oversight system 15 ICAO Recognition • Each delegated function and task would be mapped to a USOAP CMA Protocol Question (PQ) or set of PQs . • Provider’s functions would be classified in accordance with the potential level of empowerment granted by States. • Recognition would be granted in respect to the specific functions and delegation level carried out by the safety oversight provider 16 8
23/12/2017 Levels of Delegation • For Level 1 functions, ICAO recognition would be based on a review of the provider’s qualifications and experience and a Certifying, “USOAP-type” self-assessment, with licensing and reassessment at a determined frequency Operational approving • For Level 2 functions, ICAO recognition assistance agency would be based on an assessment of Advisory and functions functions capabilities of the provider, based on coordinating (inspections) USOAP methodology, with reassessment at functions a determined frequency Level 3 • For Level 3 functions, a provider would Level 2 undergo a USOAP CMA audit. ICAO Level 1 recognition would be retained dependent on USOAP CMA activities USOAP Recognition 17 ICAO GASOS Recognition Process Level 1: Assessment By Safety that minimum Oversight requirements Function are met Level 2: ICAO Recognition of Safety Level Assessment of Providers Functions Oversight Application 1, 2 or Competence and Levels Provider 3? (USOAP Methodology) Level 3: USOAP CMA 18 9
23/12/2017 Benefits States RSOOs ICAO • Provides an alternative to having • Apply USOAP CMA to RSOOs and • RSOOs would be empowered and all safety oversight functions in- strengthened to effectively carry safety oversight providers for house with the required staffing. out functions on behalf of States. States, resulting in more efficient and effective use of resources • Ability to maintain a more cost- • RSOOs would be fully aligned with efficient and effective CAA ICAO’s regional and global safety • Provide for a higher and more programmes , to include the GASP, consistent compliance with the • Flexibility to choose and combine ICAO SARPs safety management, and USOAP from different providers for the CMA programmes. various functions. • Safety enhanced globally • Efficiencies would be realized with • Access to services beyond the respect to current regulatory conventional RSOOs, from outside systems and safety oversight audit of the State’s sub-region, to more programmes. global best practices. 19 Regional Endorsement EURNAT-DGCA May 2017 NACC-DGCA September 2017 RASG-MID/06 September 2017 APAC-DGCA August 2017 RSOO Forum March 2017 RAAC (DGCA)/15 December 2017 20 10
Recommend
More recommend
