5/30/2013 Case 1 Traumatic Brain Injury : Review, Update, and Controversies 32 year old male • s/p high speed MVA Shirley I. Stiver MD, PhD • Difficult extrication • Intubated at scene Case • BP 75 systolic / palp • GCS 3 (2T) • Pupils 4 mm bilateral, reactive First Management Steps ? • Motor – nil A) Give Mannitol 0.5 g/kg iv • Open femur fracture bolus B) GCS 3 - donor ? C) Get stat CT scan D) Elevate sys BP > 90 mmHg 1
5/30/2013 Compliance ∆V/∆P Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Pressure Volume Curve • Small increase in the intracranial volume • significantly increase the ICP Low and ppt herniation ICP = Brain + CSF + Blood vascular volume + Mass Lesion High Raised Intracranial Pressure Indications for Mannitol Cerebral Herniation • Signs of impending cerebral herniation (Level III) 2
5/30/2013 Motor Treatment Raised ICP Motor 1-1.4gm/kg, bolus Score 1 Nil Mannitol 2 Decerebrate • Osmotic diuresis posturing • Reduces blood 3 Decorticate posturing viscosity 4 Withdrawal 5 Localizes 6 Obeys commands Watch for hypotension Poor GCS check Brainstem reflexes Glasgow Coma Scale GCS Eyes 4 Perform after resuscitation Importance of testing & before sedation or • Pupils Verbal 5 paralytics • Corneals, • Cough and gag Motor 6 Before Paralytics Motor component of the GCS is most predictive of outcome • Often determines whether to take patient to OR 3
5/30/2013 Differentiating primary versus Guidelines Blood Pressure – Level II secondary injury • Early GCS in the field – gives you • Avoid hypotension sys the closest assessment of the BP < 90 mmHg severity of the primary impact – R esuscitated evaluation ; … • Isotonic saline hypoxia / hypotension – false • Fluid resuscitation a positive balance : – No drugs / alcohol on board Maintain cerebral • Importance of the reports from perfusion ↔ avoid fluid the emergency response team Hypotension strong predictor of overload, osmotic shifts, outcome • Importance of serial GCS & brain edema • Single episode neurological testing sys BP<90 doubles mortality Case Non – Contrast CT scan Next ? A) OR for decompressive craniectomy B) ICU observation C) ICU and ICP monitoring D) Ortho to OR femur repair 4
5/30/2013 ICP Monitoring Guideline for ICP Monitoring GCS < 8 With Abnormal CT scan Unresponsive with absence of a neurological exam that can be followed Guideline ICP Treat for threshold > 20mmHg Normal CT scan with -age > 40 -unilateral or bilateral posturing -systolic pressure < 90 mmHg - ethanol intoxication Cerebral Perfusion Management Tiers of Therapy CPP = Mean arterial blood pressure – ICP Tier 1 • EVD drainage ; Sedation (Mannitol x 1) Tier 2 CPP goal > 60 mmHg • Osmotic therapy; Mannitol or Hypertonic N/S ; pCO 2 30-35 mmHg; paralysis Lund Therapy Tier 3 • Decompressive craniectomy ; • Induced Barbiturate or propofol coma 5
5/30/2013 Brain Tissue Oxygen Advanced Monitoring ? • What advanced monitoring might best help you manage this patient ? A) Cerebral blood flow probe B) Brain tissue oxygen • Brain O2 probes placed in monitor white matter C) SjVO2 – jugular venous saturation • Normal values for white matter 20-30mmHg Brain Tissue Oxygenation Jugular Venous Saturation • Cerebral blood flow Global measure of • cerebral metabolism: BBB Measures total venous brain tissue oxygen in jugular bulb • O2 content of blood Oxygen extraction Dissociation • by the brain & Diffusion of O2 Normal values 20-30 SjvO2 Normal values 50-75% mmHg (white matter) Critical values < 50 Critical values < 15 6
5/30/2013 UpDATES Case ICP 18 1. “A Trial of Intracranial -Pressure Monitoring in MAP 86 TBI” R. Chesnut et al. NEJM 367: 2471-81 (2012). – Treatment based on ICP monitor vs Clinical Exam FiO2 50% 7.4/35/141 PBrO2 18 2. Protect Study – Methylprednisolone 3. Pharmacologic DVT Prophylaxis in TBI SjVO2 90 At 6mo ICP Clinical p ICP versus Clinical Exam value ICP versus Clinical 1° Outcome 56 53 0.5 Results score No randomized trial to show that treatment based on Mortality 39% 44% 0.4 monitored ICP improves outcome Favorable 44% 39% 324 severe TBI patients Outcome • Randomly assigned to Unfavorable 17% 17% 1. ICP monitor group Outcome 2. Clinical group Conclusions – Outcome measures : survival, functional and Management guided by neuropsychological outcome at 6 months ICP Monitoring NOT > Clinical Exam R. Chesnut NEJM 367: 2471-81 (2012) 7
5/30/2013 Recent Studies Pharmacologic DVT DVT Prophylaxis after TBI Prophylaxis in TBI The controversy : • TBI : enoxaparin has the potential to Importance of hemorrhage stability before starting prophylaxis iatrogenically exacerbate intracranial hemorrhage Worsening of hemorrhage between 1 st and 2 nd CT scan followed by enox 13-fold increase in • View that hemorrhage stabilizes with time rate of continued hemorrhage • Is there an early prohibitive period, but once Stable scan – no hemorrhage expansion hemorrhage stabilizes, anticoagulation is safe - - Timing ? A. Levy et al, J. Trauma 68: 886-94 (2010) Recent Studies Pharmacologic DVT Parkland Risk Stratification for Model Prophylaxis in TBI Starting Enoxaparin • Risk stratification by injury patterns Moderate Low Risk High Risk -different lesions have different risks of hemorrhage Risk progression different time frames for stabilization, and different times for starting prophylaxis Repeat CT Repeat CT no no Consider at 24h at 72 h IVC filter Stable ? Stable ? Low risk for enox at 24h : yes yes SDH < 9mm Start Enox Start Enox EDH < 9mm at 24 h at 72 h Contusion < 2cm Single contusion per lobe S. Norwood J Trauma 65: 1021-27 (2008) H. Phelan, J Neurotrauma 29: 1821-28 (2012) 8
5/30/2013 Controversy Decra: Study Methods Does Decompressive Craniectomy Improve Outcome ? • Severe TBI (GCS 3-8) with Diffuse injury • Tier 1 therapy: osmotics, sedation, paralytics, EVD DECRA Study drainage • Refractory ICP defined as >20mmHg for > 15min Bifrontal decompressive Continued ICU Care craniectomy Tier 2 & 3 therapy : • mild hypothermia to 35’ • Barbiturate coma Hemi- DECRA Study Results : GOSE @6mo Craniectomy 25 20 15 RescueICP 10 DC • www.rescueicp.com MC 5 0 Die Veg LS DC US LM UM LG UG • DC shifted survivors from favorable unfavorable outcome (dependent for ADLs) 9
5/30/2013 Conclusions Basic Principles – Once ICP already used up compensatory reserves – Mannitol for impending herniation – Poor GCS brainstem exam – Distinguish primary v secondary injury – Hypoxia / hypotension / drugs & ethanol may mask GCS – ICP monitoring for unresponsive without neuro exam History Pharmacologic DVT Prophylaxis DECRA: Study Design in TBI • 155 adults, aged 15-59 yrs History • Severe TBI (GCS 3-8) with Diffuse injury • No role for pharmacologic prophylaxis in TBI before 2000 • Randomized Standard Care vs Bifrontal • Gearhart 2000 – craniectomy for Refractory ICP – DVT prophylaxis in 102 trauma patients • Outcome : GOS- E @ 6mo ‡ – 26 TBI with intracranial blood no instance of TBI worsening • Kim 2002 - Exclusions – 76 severe TBI, unfrac heparin; groups <72 h and > 72 h ; – no increase in intracranial bleeding between groups - Dilated, unreactive pupils - Mass lesions (unless small) - Cardiac arrest at scene 10
5/30/2013 Decra: Study Methods DECRA: Study Results • Severe TBI (GCS 3-8) with Diffuse injury • Icp control • Tier 1 therapy: osmotics, sedation, paralytics, EVD drainage • Refractory ICP defined as >20mmHg for > 15min Bifrontal decompressive Continued ICU Care Tier 2 & 3 therapy : craniectomy • mild hypothermia to 35’ • Barbiturate coma Life saving DC >72 h after admission 11
Recommend
More recommend