carancahua bay watershed protection plan and tmdl i plan
play

Carancahua Bay Watershed Protection Plan and TMDL I-Plan Michael - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Carancahua Bay Watershed Protection Plan and TMDL I-Plan Michael Schramm 1 Overview Brief Recap SELECT Management Measures Measuring Success 2 Recap Load Reduction Curves to assess pollutant loads and identify needed


  1. Carancahua Bay Watershed Protection Plan and TMDL I-Plan Michael Schramm 1

  2. Overview  Brief Recap  SELECT  Management Measures  Measuring Success 2

  3. Recap  Load Reduction Curves to assess pollutant loads and identify needed reductions  Identified 86% reduction in bacteria loads required to meet water quality standards 3

  4. Recap • Discussed and estimated possible sources 4

  5. Recap  Ranked out possible management measures 5

  6. SELECT Michael Schramm – Texas Water Resources Institute Uvashree Mohandass – Texas A&M Water Management and Hydrological Science April 24, 2018 6

  7. Estimating Potential Enterococcus Loads  Spatially Explicit Load Enrichment Calculation Tool (SELECT)  Characterize bacteria sources based on spatial (how things are distributed across the landscape) factors  Relies on: ◉ Land use ◉ Soil ◉ Population density estimates 7

  8. SELECT Best Available Data Identify the areas Stakeholder Subwatershed and sources with Research Input boundaries highest potential NASS Landowner practices Land Cover/ Land NLCD to impact water Local knowledge use US Census quality Soils Other Local, State, and Federal Livestock & Datasets Wildlife Populations Human Populations Bacteria Loading Rates Total Potential Loading 8

  9. Enterococcus Potential Load Summary 1.00E+14 3.67E+13 1.00E+13 1.72E+12 1.29E+12 1.00E+12 1.57E+11 1.00E+11 Enterococcus Potential Load (cfu/day) 1.00E+10 1.00E+09 9.67E+07 1.00E+08 2.40E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+06 1.00E+05 1.00E+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+02 1.00E+01 1.00E+00 Cattle OSSFs Feral Hogs WWTFs (Recent WWTFs (Permitted Domestic Pets Discharge) Discharge) 9

  10. GIS Analysis: Cattle Potential Loading from Cattle:  Estimated 24,496 head  Annual Load 3.67 × 10 13 cfu/yr  Subwatersheds 1, 2, 6 10

  11. GIS Analysis: Feral Hogs Potential Loading from Feral Hogs:  Estimated 5,936 feral hogs  Annual Load 1.57 × 10 11 cfu/yr  Subwatersheds 1, 2 11

  12. GIS Analysis: OSSFs Potential Loading from OSSFs:  Estimated 1,389 OSSFs  Annual Load 4.70 × 10 13 cfu/yr  Subwatersheds 2, 6 12

  13. GIS Analysis: Pets (Dogs & Cats) Potential Loading from Dogs:  Estimated 937 dogs & 1,024 cats  Annual Load 1.72 × 10 12 cfu/yr (DRAFT)  SELECT map is not completed yet 13

  14. GIS Analysis: WWTPs Recent Discharge Potential Loading from WWTPs:  3 WWTPs  Annual Load 8.75 × 10 9 cfu/yr  Subwatershed 4 14

  15. GIS Analysis: WWTPs Permitted Discharge Potential Loading from WWTPs:  3 WWTPs  Annual Load 3.53 × 10 10 cfu/yr  Subwatershed 4 15

  16. SELECT Summary Potential Daily Load a Source Priority Subwatersheds 3.67×10 13 Cattle 1, 2, 6 1.57×10 11 Feral Hogs 1, 2 1.29×10 12 OSSFs 2, 6 (Pending final SELECT run) 1.72×10 12 (Pending final SELECT run) Dogs & Cats Wastewater plants 2.40×10 7 4 (Recent Discharge) 9.67×10 7 Wastewater plants 4 (Permitted Discharge) a in units of MPN/day 16

  17. Contact Us Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute 979-845-2028 taberthold@ag.tamu.edu Michael Schramm Texas Water Resources Institute 979-458-9191 michael.schramm@ag.tamu.edu

  18. Management Measures Michael Schramm Allen Berthold Ph.D. Stephanie Ruff Texas Water Resources Institute April 24, 2018 1

  19. Management Measures Develop and implement Water Quality Management Plans 1. or conservation plans Increase soil testing on agricultural lands 2. Repair and replace failing OSSFs 3. Develop voluntary OSSF inspection program 4. Promote feral hog control and removal 5. Promote effective pet waste management 6. 2

  20. Develop and implement Water Quality Management Plans or conservation plans  Fund and hire a field technician ($75,000 per year)  Develop and implement 70 plans ($15,000 per plan)  Provide outreach and promotional material to increase participation  Estimated load reductions ◉ 3.75 × 10 14 MPN/year Enterococcus ◉ 7.76 × 10 4 pounds of nitrogen per year ◉ 2.75 × 10 4 pounds of phosphorous per year Currently 24 WQMPs covering 5,277 acres in the watershed 3

  21. Increase soil testing on agricultural lands  Soil testing by producers/property owners ($10 per test ~20 acres)  Develop and implement soil testing campaign ($78,252 covers 156,505 acres of pastures and cropland)  Estimated load reductions ◉ Unknown, nutrient reductions will be property and producer specific 4

  22. Repair and replace failing OSSFs  Develop and administer OSSF repair/replacement program  Repair and replace 42 septic tanks ($5 - $10k per system)  Estimated load reductions ◉ 9.67 × 10 12 MPN/year Enterococcus ◉ 4.87 × 10 2 pounds of nitrogen per year ◉ 1.22 × 10 2 pounds of phosphorous per year 5

  23. Develop Voluntary OSSF Inspection Program  Develop and administer a voluntary OSSF inspection program  Estimated load reductions ◉ Unknown 6

  24. Promote Feral Hog Removal and Control  Construct fencing around deer feeders ($200 per feeder)  Trap, hunt, remove hogs on site  Deliver feral hog management workshops  Reduce population by 15% below current population estimate  Estimated load reductions ◉ 8.58 × 10 12 MPN/year Enterococcus ◉ 5.68 × 10 3 pounds of nitrogen per year ◉ 2.03 × 10 3 pounds of phosphorous per year 7

  25. Promote Effective Pet Waste Management  Develop and deliver education and outreach materials to at least 1,000 households  Estimated load reductions ◉ 2.69 × 10 13 MPN/year Enterococcus ◉ 88.2 pounds of nitrogen per year ◉ 20.4 pounds of phosphorous per year 8

  26. Additional Needs  Part or full-time watershed coordinator  Continued and additional water quality monitoring ◉ Assess progress (next presentation) ◉ Limited dissolved oxygen data available  Education and outreach ◉ General water quality education (Texas Watershed Stewards, Texas Well Owners Network, Lone Star Healthy Streams, Riparian Ecosystem, and others) ◉ Texas Stream Team volunteer monitoring ◉ Newsletters, websites, meetings, and other methods to increase awareness 9

  27. Total Potential Load Reduction  Needed bacteria load reduction to meet existing water quality standards: 2.86 × 10 14 MPN/year  Potential bacteria load reduction with management measures after 10 years: 4.20 × 10 14 MPN/year 10

  28. Contact Us Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute 979-845-2028 taberthold@ag.tamu.edu Michael Schramm Texas Water Resources Institute 979-458-9191 michael.schramm@ag.tamu.edu

  29. Measuring Success Michael Schramm Allen Berthold Ph.D. Texas Water Resources Institute April 24, 2018 1

  30. Measuring Success  Positive impacts on water quality might take a long time  Tracking water quality status and implementation progress is critical to stay focused on the big picture  Adaptive management is a process to adjust the plan if things take a wrong turn 2

  31. Water quality goals and targets 2014 Dec 2008 – 2025 Target 2030 Goal Integrated Nov 2016* Report 7-yr Geometric 124 67.3 57 35 Mean MPN/100mL MPN/100mL MPN/100mL MPN/100mL * This is not the official data assessment for Carancahua Bay . 3

  32. Water quality goals and targets Dissolved Oxygen Exceedances 80 Percent Exceedances 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 2025 2030 Year Minimum DO Average DO 4

  33. Data Reviews  TCEQ Integrated Report on Surface Water Quality  Provide up to date 7-yr Geometric Mean for Enterococcus and Binomial Test for Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrients  Statistical trend analysis of water quality concentrations and instream loads 5

  34. Project Milestones  Milestones are established to evaluate implementation progress  Interim milestones helps break up seemingly large milestones into more achievable actions 6

  35. Project Milestones 7

  36. Adaptive Management  The watershed plan is a living document  Review and revise as necessary  When do we need to revise the plan? – Adaptive management 8

  37. Adaptive Management  Formal review after 5 years  Three assessments for positive progress: ◉ Water quality – increase in pollutant concentrations and/or loads, increase in % exceedances ◉ Implementation progress – Substantial delays or lower than expected achievements ◉ External factors – Significant increases in population, changes in land use, economic factors, or other data that point to increases in pollutant sources or changes in hydrologic condition  Two or more events should trigger changes in the plan 9

  38. Adaptive Management  Are additional assessments/criteria warranted for adaptive management? 10

  39. Contact Us Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute 979-845-2028 taberthold@ag.tamu.edu Michael Schramm Texas Water Resources Institute 979-458-9191 michael.schramm@ag.tamu.edu

Recommend


More recommend