blm thresholds in the ir5 q6 region
play

BLM thresholds in the IR5 Q6 region L.S. Esposito and F. Cerutti, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BLM thresholds in the IR5 Q6 region L.S. Esposito and F. Cerutti, CERN FLUKA team, EN-STI-EET LHC Collimation Working Group meeting #182, Oct 27, 2014 Summary from previous meetings - 1 with respect to 10 These considerations were first


  1. BLM thresholds in the IR5 Q6 region L.S. Esposito and F. Cerutti, CERN FLUKA team, EN-STI-EET LHC Collimation Working Group meeting #182, Oct 27, 2014

  2. Summary from previous meetings - 1 with respect to 10 σ These considerations were first verified with respect to collision debris 2 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  3. Summary from previous meetings - 2 Later, the contribution from beam gas (and TCL6 impact on RR electronics) was discussed at Collimation WG #168 3 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  4. Roman Pot operation and vacuum levels - 1 From these data, it can be concluded that an important pressure gradient is present around RP stations Gas profile approximated by a rectangular spike of 8 × 10 16 H 2 /m 3 over 5 m centered at the RP220m location The effect of this simple gas spike is limited by construction to the Q6-Q7 region Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  5. Roman Pot operation and vacuum levels - 2 what about vacuum levels? Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  6. Roman Pot operation and vacuum levels - 3 7 10 -8 mbar VGPB.235.6R5.B.PR VGPB.2.6R5.B.PR VGI.77.6R5.B.PR VGPB.4.6R5.B.PR Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  7. Let’s assume that pressure spikes are prevented - 1 impact on Q6 and Q7 from collision debris Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  8. Let’s assume that pressure spikes are prevented - 2 BLM signals from collision debris Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  9. Layout & FLUKA model refreshing - 1 Q7 RP RPT stations DQR Q6 Q5 9 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  10. Layout & FLUKA model refreshing - 2 RPT 10 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  11. Back to a pressure spike scenario - 1 impact on Q6 and Q7 from rectangular gas spike centered around FH220m normalisation is given by #interactions/s = I × ρ × σ p-H2 × L where: σ p-H2 = 2 × σ p-p ≃ 2 × 38.6 mb ρ = 8 × 10 16 molecules/m 3 I = 0.581/e A L = 5.0 m that gives ~ 1.1 × 10 7 interactions/s 11 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  12. Back to a pressure spike scenario - 2 BLM signals from rectangular gas spike centered around FH220m normalisation is given by #interactions/s = I × ρ × σ p-H2 × L where: σ p-H2 = 2 × σ p-p ≃ 2 × 38.6 mb ρ = 8 × 10 16 molecules/m 3 I = 0.581/e A L = 5.0 m that gives ~ 1.1 × 10 7 interactions/s 12 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  13. BLM signals: debris vs pressure spike 13 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  14. DS protection by TCL6 10 σ aperture of the TCL6 external jaw is necessary to protect Q9 This setting reduces the contribution of TCL6 to the impedance budget 14 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  15. Summary • Losses in 2012 and 2011 due to pressure spike induced by RP insertion • RP operation not harmful for Q6 and Q7, even with TCL6 open • BLM signals expected with 7 TeV beams at nominal lumi as well as in presence of a pressure spike have been evaluated • If TCL6 is closed at 10 sigma, significant increase of the Q6 BLM signal • TCL6 protects very effectively the DS, also in case of an asymmetric aperture 15 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  16. Spares

  17. Contribution from timing RPs - 1 RPT disk 7.25 cm radius along z, 30 um thick RP rect 12.5 along z, 15 um thick 17 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  18. Contribution from timing RPs - 2 18 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  19. Comparison 4 TeV vs 7 TeV: debris TCL4 helps to reduce the BLM losses along the entire Matching Section 19 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

  20. Comparison 4 TeV vs 7 TeV: pressure spike No strong dependence on energy 20 Roman Pots operation and BLM signals F. Cerutti CWG # 182, Oct 27, 2014

Recommend


More recommend