bitcoin smart contracts
play

Bitcoin Smart Contracts Saravanan Vijayakumaran sarva@ee.iitb.ac.in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bitcoin Smart Contracts Saravanan Vijayakumaran sarva@ee.iitb.ac.in Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay August 26, 2019 1 / 17 Smart Contracts Computer protocols which help execution/enforcement of


  1. Bitcoin Smart Contracts Saravanan Vijayakumaran sarva@ee.iitb.ac.in Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay August 26, 2019 1 / 17

  2. Smart Contracts • Computer protocols which help execution/enforcement of regular contracts • Minimize trust between interacting parties • Hypothetical example: Automatic fine for noise pollution • IITB hillside community hall parties use loudspeakers • Party organizers pay bitcoin security deposit • If noise rules violated, deposit distributed to nearby residents • Two actual examples • Escrow • Micropayments 2 / 17

  3. Escrow Contract

  4. Problem Setup • Alice wants to buy a rare book from Bob • Alice and Bob live in different cities • Bob promises to ship the book upon receiving Bitcoin payment • Alice does not trust Bob • Alice proposes an escrow contract involving a third party Carol 4 / 17

  5. Escrow Contract • Alice requests public keys from Bob and Carol • Alice pays x bitcoins to a 2-of-3 multisig output OP_2 <PubKeyA> <PubKeyB> <PubKeyC> OP_3 OP_CHECKMULTISIG • Bob ships book once Alice’s transaction is confirmed • Bitcoins can be spent if any two of the three provide signatures • Any of the following scenarios can occur • Alice receives book. Alice and Bob sign. • Alice receives the book but refuses to sign. Bob provides proof of shipment to Carol. Bob and Carol sign. • Bob does not ship the book to Alice. Bob refuses to sign refund transaction. Alice and Carol sign. • Escrow contract fails if Carol colludes with Alice or Bob • Also proof of shipment is not proof of contents 5 / 17

  6. Lock Times

  7. Transaction Lock Time Regular Transaction Format nVersion Number of Inputs N Input 0 . . . Input N − 1 Number of Outputs M Output 0 . . . Output M − 1 nLockTime • nLockTime is a 4-byte field which specifies the earliest time the transaction can be included in a block 7 / 17

  8. nLockTime Values • If nLockTime < 5 × 10 8 , then it is interpreted as a block height • Transaction with nLockTime = 600,000 will not be included in any block with height < 600,000 • If nLockTime ≥ 5 × 10 8 , then it is interpreted as a Unix time • Unix time = Number of seconds since Jan 1, 1970 12:00AM UTC • Unix time of 1,514,797,200 = 9:00 AM on January 1, 2018 • Transaction with Unix time lock time will not be included unless the median-time-past of the latest block exceeds the nLockTime value • The median-time-past of a block at height h is the median of the nTime values in the 11 blocks at heights h , h − 1 , . . . , h − 10. • The nTime field of a candidate block at height N must exceed the median-time-past of the block at N − 1. • What if we need block height ≥ 5 × 10 8 or Unix time < 5 × 10 8 ? • It would take 9,500 years to reach block height 5 × 10 8 • Unix time of 5 × 10 8 is 12:53AM on Nov 5, 1985 8 / 17

  9. Relative Lock Times Input Format hash n scriptSigLen scriptSig nSequence • The 4-byte nSequence field is used to specify a relative lock time of an input • Can have units which of either blocks or seconds • Suppose the relative lock time of an input is k blocks • If the output which is being unlocked by this input is in block K , then a transaction containing this input cannot be included in a block whose height is less than K + k • A similar condition holds for relative lock time in seconds 9 / 17

  10. Relative Lock Time from nSequence Value Start nSequence does Yes nSequence[31] = 1? not encode a relative lock time No k = nSequence[15:0] No Yes nSequence[22] = 1? Relative lock time Relative lock time is k blocks is k × 512 seconds • Maximum relative lock time in blocks is 2 16 − 1 = 65 , 535 blocks ≈ 1.25 years • Maximum relative lock time in seconds is ( 2 16 − 1 ) × 512 = 33 , 553 , 920 seconds ≈ 1.06 years 10 / 17

  11. Micropayments

  12. Problem Setup • Bitcoin transaction fees make small payments expensive • Micropayments contract can aggregate small payments • Alice offers proofreading and editing services online • She accepts bitcoins as payments • Clients email documents to Alice • Alice replies with typos and grammatical errors • Alice charges a fixed amount of bitcoins per edited page • To avoid clients refusing payment, Alice uses micropayments contract • Suppose Bob wants a 100 page document edited • Alice charges 0.0001 BTC per page • Bob expects to pay a maximum of 0.01 BTC to Alice 12 / 17

  13. Micropayments Contract (1/3) Creating Refund Transaction • Bob requests a public key from Alice Alice Bob • Bob creates a transaction t 1 which y p u b l i c k e e q u e s t R transfers 0.01 bitcoins to a 2-of-2 multisig output S e n d P u b K e y A Create PubKeyB Create t 1 • Bob does not broadcast t 1 on the Create t 2 g i t h B ’ s s i e n d t 2 w network S S e n • Bob creates a refund transaction t 2 d t 2 w i t h A s ’ s i g which refunds the 0.01 BTC • A relative lock time of n days is set on t 2 • Bob includes his signature in t 2 and sends it to Alice • If Alice refuses to sign, Bob terminates the contract • If Alice signs t 2 and gives it Bob, he has the refund transaction 13 / 17

  14. Micropayments Contract (2/3) Getting Paid for First Page Edits • Bob broadcasts t 1 on the network Alice Bob Network • Once t 1 is confirmed, he sends Alice i c k e y u e s t p u b l R e q his document S e n d P u b K e y A Create PubKeyB • Alice edits only the first page of the Create t 1 document Create t 2 s i g w i t h B ’ s S e n d t 2 • She creates a transaction e 1 which S e n d t 2 w i t h A ’ B r s s i g o a d c a s t t 1 unlocks t 1 and pays her 0.0001 BTC o n m a t i c o n fi r t 1 and 0.0099 BTC to Bob o c u m e n t S e n d d S e n d e 1 w i t • Alice signs e 1 and sends it to Bob h A ’ s s i g a n d p a g e 1 e d i t s B ’ s s i g n d e 1 w t i h along with the first page edits S e • If Bob refuses to sign e 1 , then • Alice terminates the contract. • Bob broadcasts t 2 after lock time expires • If Bob signs e 1 and returns it to Alice, then Alice is guaranteed 0.0001 bitcoins if she broadcasts e 1 before lock time on t 2 expires. 14 / 17

  15. Micropayments Contract (3/3) Getting Paid for Second Page, Third Page . . . • Alice edits the second page of the Alice Bob Network document Request public key • She creates a transaction e 2 which Send PubKeyA unlocks t 1 and pays her 0.0002 BTC Create PubKeyB Create t 1 and 0.0098 BTC to Bob Create t 2 Send t 2 with B’s sig • Alice signs e 2 and sends it to Bob Send t 2 with A’s sig Broadcast t 1 along with the second page edits t 1 confirmation Send document • If Bob refuses to sign e 2 , then Alice terminates the contract. Send e 1 with A’s sig and page 1 edits Alice broadcasts e 1 and receives Send e 1 with B’s sig 0.0001 BTC. Send e 2 with A’s sig and page 2 edits • If Bob signs e 2 and returns it to Alice, Send e 2 with B’s sig then Alice is guaranteed 0.0002 . . bitcoins if she broadcasts e 2 before . lock time on t 2 expires. Send e 100 with A’s sig and page 100 edits • Alice continues sending edited pages Send e 100 with B’s sig along with transactions requesting B r o a d c a s t e 1 0 0 cumulative payments o n c o n fi r m a t i e 1 0 0 • She has to finish before the refund transaction lock time expires 15 / 17

  16. Key Takeaways • Smart contracts reduce the need for trust • Bitcoin’s scripting language enables some smart contracts • Not powerful enough to express complex contracts 16 / 17

  17. References • Chapters 5, 6 of An Introduction to Bitcoin , S. Vijayakumaran, www.ee.iitb.ac.in/~sarva/bitcoin.html 17 / 17

Recommend


More recommend