automorphism groups of homogeneous structures
play

Automorphism Groups of Homogeneous Structures Andrs Villaveces - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Automorphism Groups of Homogeneous Structures Andrs Villaveces - Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Bogot


  1. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Automorphism Groups of Homogeneous Structures Andrés Villaveces - Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Bogotá Arctic Set Theory Workshop 3 - Kilpisjärvi - January 2017

  2. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Contents Reconstructing models The reconstruction problem The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Uncountable models, still First Order SIP (non-elementary) The setting: strong amalgamation classes Genericity and Amalgamation Bases Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants

  3. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants A “classical enigma”: reconstructing from symmetry. At a very classical extreme, there is the old enigma: There is some object M .

  4. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants A “classical enigma”: reconstructing from symmetry. At a very classical extreme, there is the old enigma: There is some object M . I give you the symmetries of M , i.e. Aut ( M ) .

  5. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants A “classical enigma”: reconstructing from symmetry. At a very classical extreme, there is the old enigma: There is some object M . I give you the symmetries of M , i.e. Aut ( M ) . Tell me what is M !

  6. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Reconstructing models? In Model Theory (and in other parts of Mathematics!), the same naïve enigma has important variants. The main version is usually called “The Reconstruction Problem”:

  7. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Reconstructing models? In Model Theory (and in other parts of Mathematics!), the same naïve enigma has important variants. The main version is usually called “The Reconstruction Problem”: ◮ if for some (First Order) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , what can we say about M ? (In general, not much! by e.g. Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski).

  8. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Reconstructing models? In Model Theory (and in other parts of Mathematics!), the same naïve enigma has important variants. The main version is usually called “The Reconstruction Problem”: ◮ if for some (First Order) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , what can we say about M ? (In general, not much! by e.g. Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski). ◮ a more reasonable question: if for some (First Order) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , what can we say about Th ( M ) ?

  9. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Reconstructing models? In Model Theory (and in other parts of Mathematics!), the same naïve enigma has important variants. The main version is usually called “The Reconstruction Problem”: ◮ if for some (First Order) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , what can we say about M ? (In general, not much! by e.g. Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski). ◮ a more reasonable question: if for some (First Order) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , what can we say about Th ( M ) ? ◮ an even more reasonable question: if for some (FO) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , when can we recover all models biinterpretable with M ?

  10. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Reconstructing models? In Model Theory (and in other parts of Mathematics!), the same naïve enigma has important variants. The main version is usually called “The Reconstruction Problem”: ◮ if for some (First Order) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , what can we say about M ? (In general, not much! by e.g. Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski). ◮ a more reasonable question: if for some (First Order) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , what can we say about Th ( M ) ? ◮ an even more reasonable question: if for some (FO) structure M we are given Aut ( M ) , when can we recover all models biinterpretable with M ? ◮ we follow ONE line of reconstruction, different from (but related to) the work of M. Rubin!

  11. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Where else in mathematics? The “naïve question” is quite important: What information about a model M and Th ( M ) is contained in the group Aut ( M ) ?

  12. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Where else in mathematics? The “naïve question” is quite important: What information about a model M and Th ( M ) is contained in the group Aut ( M ) ? What information on a metric structure ( M , d , . . . ) is contained in the isometry group Iso ( M , d , . . . ) ?

  13. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Where else in mathematics? The “naïve question” is quite important: What information about a model M and Th ( M ) is contained in the group Aut ( M ) ? What information on a metric structure ( M , d , . . . ) is contained in the isometry group Iso ( M , d , . . . ) ? ◮ (Anabelian geometry) the anabelian question: recover the isomorphism class of a variety X from its étale fundamental group π 1 ( X ) . Neukirch, Uchida, for algebraic number fields.

  14. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Where else in mathematics? The “naïve question” is quite important: What information about a model M and Th ( M ) is contained in the group Aut ( M ) ? What information on a metric structure ( M , d , . . . ) is contained in the isometry group Iso ( M , d , . . . ) ? ◮ (Anabelian geometry) the anabelian question: recover the isomorphism class of a variety X from its étale fundamental group π 1 ( X ) . Neukirch, Uchida, for algebraic number fields. ◮ (Koenigsmann) K and G K ( t ) / K are biinterpretable for K a perfect field with finite extensions of degree > 2 and prime to char ( K ) .

  15. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants Where else in mathematics? The “naïve question” is quite important: What information about a model M and Th ( M ) is contained in the group Aut ( M ) ? What information on a metric structure ( M , d , . . . ) is contained in the isometry group Iso ( M , d , . . . ) ? ◮ (Anabelian geometry) the anabelian question: recover the isomorphism class of a variety X from its étale fundamental group π 1 ( X ) . Neukirch, Uchida, for algebraic number fields. ◮ (Koenigsmann) K and G K ( t ) / K are biinterpretable for K a perfect field with finite extensions of degree > 2 and prime to char ( K ) . These are versions of the same kind of problem - but we will not concentrate on these today. They may however be amenable to model theoretic treatment.

  16. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants La reconstruction de structures à la Lascar ◮ Every automorphism of M extends uniquely to an automorphism of M eq ; therefore, Aut ( M ) ≈ Aut ( M eq ) canonically.

  17. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants La reconstruction de structures à la Lascar ◮ Every automorphism of M extends uniquely to an automorphism of M eq ; therefore, Aut ( M ) ≈ Aut ( M eq ) canonically. ◮ Having that M eq ≈ N eq implies that M and N are bi-interpretable.

  18. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants La reconstruction de structures à la Lascar ◮ Every automorphism of M extends uniquely to an automorphism of M eq ; therefore, Aut ( M ) ≈ Aut ( M eq ) canonically. ◮ Having that M eq ≈ N eq implies that M and N are bi-interpretable. ◮ If M is ℵ 0 -categorical, any open subgroup of Aut ( M ) is a stabilizer Aut α ( M ) for some imaginary α . Also Aut ( M ) � { H ≤ Aut ( M ) | H open } (conjugation).

  19. Reconstructing models The Small Index Property SIP beyond first order Examples: quasiminimal classes, the Zilber field, j-invariants La reconstruction de structures à la Lascar ◮ Every automorphism of M extends uniquely to an automorphism of M eq ; therefore, Aut ( M ) ≈ Aut ( M eq ) canonically. ◮ Having that M eq ≈ N eq implies that M and N are bi-interpretable. ◮ If M is ℵ 0 -categorical, any open subgroup of Aut ( M ) is a stabilizer Aut α ( M ) for some imaginary α . Also Aut ( M ) � { H ≤ Aut ( M ) | H open } (conjugation). ◮ The action Aut ( M ) � is (almost) ≈ to Aut ( M ) � M eq .

Recommend


More recommend