asymptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions of three
play

Asymptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions of three-particle Schr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Asymptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions of three-particle Schr odinger operator. II. One-dimensional charged particles. Buslaev V.S., Levin S.B. St. Petersburg State University 1 Introduction Setting of the problem. Scattered plane wave


  1. Asymptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions of three-particle Schr¨ odinger operator. II. One-dimensional charged particles. Buslaev V.S., Levin S.B. St. Petersburg State University 1

  2. Introduction Setting of the problem. Scattered plane wave First of all, we have to describe the configuration space of the system. Originally, the configuration space is the euclidian space R 3 , but after the separation of the motion of the center of mass it is reduced to two-dimensional subspace Γ = { z ∈ R 3 : z 1 + z 2 + z 3 = 0 } with the naturally induced euclidian structure ⋖ , ⋗ on it. 2

  3. The Schr¨ odinger operator H has the form H = − ∆ + V ( z ) , z ∈ Γ , (1) where ∆ is the Laplacian on the space Γ . We consider the Schr¨ odinger equation Hψ = Eψ . V is supposed to have the following structure V = v ( x 1 ) + v ( x 2 ) + v ( x 3 ) , (2) where x 1 = 1 2 ( z 3 − z 2 ) , x 2 = 1 2 ( z 1 − z 3 ) , x 3 = 1 √ √ √ 2 ( z 1 − z 3 ) . (3) 3

  4. The variables x j becomes equal to 0 along some axis l j , j = 1 , 2 , 3 , on Γ . It is supposed that the pair potential v ( x ) is a continuous positive-valued function that tends to 0 at infinity. We will dis- tinguish, roughly speaking, two essentially different cases : fast decay pair potential, xv ( x ) → 0 , and the Coulomb type potential, xv ( x ) → α � = 0 . 4

  5. Let us denote the general vector of Γ by x , and the vector of the dual space (momentum space), naturally identified with Γ , by q . r and ω j = x j Let r = | x | , ω = x r , j = 1 , 2 , 3 . Consider two approx- imate as r → ∞ solutions R ( x , E ) of the Schr¨ odinger equation. These solutions are: for fast decaying potentials √ 1 r 1 / 2 e [ i Er ] . R = R 0 = (4) For the Coulomb type potentials � � √ 1 α 1 + 1 + 1 √ R = R c = r 1 / 2 exp [ i Er + iγ ln r ] , γ = − . ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 2 E (5) In the last formula we suppose that x � l j , j = 1 , 2 , 3 . 5

  6. Now we are able to describe the boundary conditions at infinity. Let � 2 π q √ √ n ( ω, θ ) = δ ( ω, θ ) , θ = , (6) i E E where δ ( ω, θ ) is the delta-function on the unit circle with the standard angle measure. Fix a vector (wave vector) q that lies inside one of the sectors be- tween l j , j = 1 , 2 , 3 . Now the asymptotic behavior of the solution can be fixed by the condition ψ ∼ ψ ( x , q ) = n ( ω, q ) R ∗ + f ( ω, q ) R + o ( r − 1 / 2 ) . (7) as r → ∞ . 6

  7. The asymptotic formula has to be considered in the weak with respect to ω sense, and both functions n and f must be treated as singular distributions. The first term of the asymptotic repre- sentation coincides with the first term of the weak asymptotic description of the plane wave e i< q , x > , so it is natural to call the solution ψ ( x , q ) the scattered plane wave. The solutions that are defined by the above asymptotic behavior can be treated as the generalized eigenfunctions of the contin- uous spectrum of the operator H . We have to remark that the corresponding theorem is not proved yet rigorously. 7

  8. Asymptotic behavior of the scattered plane wave. The definition of the scattered plane wave itself gives some in- formation on the asymptotic behavior of the solution at infinity. We hope that this information is sufficient for the definition, but it is not sufficient for many other goals. We need more precise description of the asymptotic behavior, say, in the uniform norm, with respect to ω to prove rigorously the existence of the solu- tion, to use it for physical applications, to find approaches for the numerical computations of the solution, and for some other goals. We will construct here on the heuristic level the continu- ous function ψ as that gives the asymptotic behavior of ψ in the uniform norm. 8

  9. The case of fast decreasing potential was considered in [1: V.S.Buslaev and S.B.Levin, Asymptotic behavior of the eigenfunctions of many-particle Schr¨ odinger operator. I. One- dimensional particles, - Amer.Math.Soc.Transl. (2) v.225, pp.55- 71, (2008); V.S.Buslaev, S.B.Levin, P.Neittaannm¨ aki, T.Ojala, New approach to numerical computation of the eigenfunctions of the continuous spectrum of three-particle Schr¨ odinger oper- ator. I. One-dimensional particles, short-range pair potentials, - J.Phys.A: Math.Theor. 43, (2010), 285205, (pp.17)]. We represented the corresponding results a year ago at this con- ference. 9

  10. Here we find the similar asymptotic formulas for Coulomb type potentials. In fact, it is the first case when the asymptotic behavior (in the uniform norm) was found for a system of three particles interact- ing via the Coulomb pair potentials. As for the fast decreasing potentials for three dimensional particles such asymptotic be- havior was obtain in famous Faddeev’s work [3: L. D. Faddeev, Mathematical Aspects of the Three-Body Problem in the Quan- tum Scattering Theory, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta, v.69, (1963)]. 10

  11. Constructing the function ψ as we use two criteria: 1) The ψ as satisfies the weak asymptotic behavior that was de- scribed earlier and that in our approach defines ψ , and 2) the discrepancy Q [ ψ as ] = − ∆ ψ as + V ψ as − Eψ as (8) decreases at infinity faster than r − 1 . It is worth to notice that with the present initial result we can improve the asymptotic formulas such that the discrepancy would decrease as arbitrary power of r . 11

  12. Some additional geometrical remarks Introduce on Γ three orthonormalized bases ( k j , l j ) , j = 1 , 2 , 3 , that have the same orientation . Let l j ∈ l j and the angles be- tween any two unit vectors l j are equal to 2 / 3 π . There are two such choices of the vectors l j , we can take any of them. The coordinates of the vector x with respect to these three bases will be denoted by ( x j , y j ) . These are the classical Jacobi co- ordinates. The coordinates of the vector q will be denoted by ( k j , p j ) . We also will consider six rays l ± generated by the vec- j tors ± l j , j = 1 , 2 , 3 . 12

  13. 13

  14. Consider on the configuration plane the group of transformations S generated by the reflections τ j with respect to the straight-lines l j . It consists of six elements I, τ 1 , τ 2 , τ 3 , τ 2 τ 3 , τ 2 τ 1 , their general notation is σ . The Schr¨ odinger equation is invariant with respect to the group. Consider six sectors λ σ that is situated between pairs of the neighboring rays l ± j , here σ denotes the element of S , that trans- fers the sector λ I situated between l + 1 and l − 3 , into the considered sector. The sector λ I will be denoted also simply λ. We will assume q ∈ λ . Applying to it different elements of S , we obtain six other vectors q σ = σ q , q σ ∈ λ σ . 14

  15. Constructing of ψ as The plan that we use to construct ψ as consists of several steps: A) . First of all, we construct some generalization of the plane wave. It is easy to see that in the case of Coulomb type potentials there is no a direct analog of the elementary globally defined plane wave. We can construct the analog of the plane wave (that we call the Coulomb plane wave) only inside of any sector λ σ . 15

  16. Let us denote this analog by ψ c ( x , q ) and define it in the sector λ σ by the formula ψ σ ( x , q ) = exp [ i < q , x > + i ∆ σ ( x , q )] , (9) � � sgn ( x 1 ) ln | x 1 | + sgn ( x 2 ) ln | x 2 | + sgn ( x 3 ) ∆ σ ( x , q ) = − α ln | x 3 | . 2 k 1 2 k 2 2 k 3 (10) We suppose that the vector q is situated outside of a certain small neighborhoods of the subspaces l j , and x tends to ∞ also remaining outside of these neighborhoods. 16

  17. On the second step B) We simplify the equation near the rays l j . The simplified equations √ 3 − ∆ ψ + V j ( x ) ψ = Eψ, V j ( x ) = v ( x j ) + 2 v ( 2 y j ) (11) have new potentials V j such that on some vicinities of l j the dif- ference V − V j tends to zero at infinity faster that the Coulomb potential. At this vicinity the simplified equation allows the sep- aration of variables. 17

  18. On the step C) We specify the solutions of the approximate equation that up to constant factors transfer at some growing distance from l j to the Coulomb plane waves . Let us again denote such solution by χ j ( x , q ) . (12) Further, we combine such solutions and their continuations via the Coulomb plane waves and define the extended solution χ j ( x , q ) on the whole angle sectors K j between the appropriate vectors q σ , q σ ′ surrounding l j . 18

  19. After that we can combine such solutions by constructing of their finite linear combination into the ray approximation ψ R . This approximation has quickly vanishing at infinity discrepancy. It is also smooth everywhere except two rays q 1 = τ 2 τ 3 q and q 3 = τ 2 τ 1 q where the ray field has simple jumps.

  20. On the last step D) We modify the ray solution in neighborhoods of these two rays q 1 and q 3 . In fact, we replace the discontinuous functions near these rays by a function smoothly connecting two different ray approximations on both sides, say, of q 1 . This function is not elementary. This completes the constructing of ψ as . 19

Recommend


More recommend