approaches to net neutrality in norway europe and us
play

Approaches to net neutrality in Norway, Europe and US Frode - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Approaches to net neutrality in Norway, Europe and US Frode Sorensen (@ipfrode) Norwegian Communications Authority (Nkom) OpenForum Net Neutrality Roundtable in the European Parliament Brussels, 4th March 2015 The Norwegian approach to net


  1. Approaches to net neutrality in Norway, Europe and US Frode Sorensen (@ipfrode) Norwegian Communications Authority (Nkom) OpenForum Net Neutrality Roundtable in the European Parliament Brussels, 4th March 2015

  2. The Norwegian approach to net neutrality • Nkom use a co-regulatory approach to net neutrality. • The Norwegian guidelines for NN launched in 2009. • The longest running net neutrality regime in Europe. • Guidelines followed by stakeholders of the industry. • The Guidelines are comparable with the Parliament resolution April 2014:  Transparency (of course)  Allow specialised services  Non-blocking and non-throttling  Allow reasonable traffic management 2

  3. Rough NN comparison Europe vs. US Europe / EP US / FCC No blocking X X No throttling X X No prioritisation X «Specialised X X * services» ** Ban zero-rating Case-by-case IP interconnect Case-by-case * The devil is in the details… ** Some national initiatives 3

  4. «Specialised services» • Specialised services provide extensive exceptions from net neutrality – therefore they  must be (virtually or physically) separated from the Internet access service at the network layer.  must not be provided at the expense of the Internet access service (IAS). • Specialised services use built-in QoS mechanisms , and they do not need protection against IAS!  It is the other way round; IAS needs protection against specialised services! 4

  5. Application-agnosticism • Differentiation in line with NN should be done based on access speed or data volume as long as all applications are treated equally. • Differentiation based on specific content or applications would constitute a breach of NN. • Zero-rating favours specific content/applications where providers, instead of end-users, decide how we should use the Internet. • Application-agnostic QoS is however possible. 5

  6. Do we understand the value of the Internet? • The Internet is different from traditional telecommunication. • Reverse engineering telecoms over IP can hardly be called innovation. • Internet applications are decoupled from the underlying network. • The Internet provides global connectivity. • We should avoid fragmenting the Internet. • Need for a pan-European approach to NN. 6

Recommend


More recommend