apna 29th annual conference session 3016 1 october 30 2015
play

APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015 Amy - PDF document

APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015 Amy LaValla DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, PHN The speaker has no conflicts of interest to disclose Identify why comprehensive fall risk assessment policies are needed Recognize


  1. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015 Amy LaValla DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, PHN  The speaker has no conflicts of interest to disclose  Identify why comprehensive fall risk assessment policies are needed  Recognize improvements made within the described facility and areas for continued growth  Recognize how to use lessons learned in this project to organize and improve future implementations and changes LaValla 1

  2. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015  Area of concern identified by The Joint Commission and Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (Degelau et al., 2012)  Falls can lead to: ◦ Injury (Healey et al., 2014; Lee, Geller & Strasser, 2013) ◦ Increased costs (Lee, Geller, & Strasser, 2013; Wu, Keeler, Rubenstein, Maglione, & Shekelle, 2010 ) ◦ Increased disability (Ivziku, Matarese, & Pedone, 2010; Oliver, Britton, Seed, Martin, & Hopper, 1997)  Individuals in psychiatric hospitals have an increased risk of falling (Blair & Grunman, 2005; Edmonson, Robinson, & Huges, 2011 )  Additional fall risk assessment tools identified ◦ Suitability based on ages and medical conditions  Updated policy included: ◦ Additional assessment tools ◦ Reassessment parameters  Visual identification available for those found to be at risk for falling  Fall risk reassessment rates ◦ 10% increase to 16.7% of patients reassessed Pat Patient ents R Reev evaluate aluated f d for r Fall R Risk B sk Befor ore an e and After ter Implementati Imp tion Before After 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% LaValla 2

  3. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015  Visual identification after implementation ◦ 35.7% of patients correctly identified to be at risk ◦ 42.9% of patients incorrectly identified Use o e of Visual I sual Identif entification cation Proper Improper 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%  Finding appropriate tools  Locating information in literature regarding policies or reassessment parameters  Delay in implementation  Accessibility of tools  Improve staff training on new policy and tools  Low accuracy of visual identification placed on/above doors  Need to reinforce new policy via communication and leadership support ◦ Incorporation of change tactics (Packard, 2013) LaValla 3

  4. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015  Improvements made  Project shortfalls may be utilized to improve future developments  Communication is key!  Blair & Grunman, 2005  Degelau et al., 2012  Edmonson, Robinson, & Huges, 2011  Healey et al., 2014  Ivziku, Matarese, & Pedone, 2010  Lee, Geller, & Strasser, 2013  Oliver, Britton, Seed, Martin, & Hopper, 1997  Packard, 2013  The Joint Commission, 2008  Wu, Keeler, Rubenstein, Maglione, & Shekelle, 2010 LaValla 4

Recommend


More recommend