annex 6 9
play

ANNEX 6 9 Strategy and Practice of Adaptive Therm al Com fort in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ANNEX 6 9 Strategy and Practice of Adaptive Therm al Com fort in Low Energy Buildings Yingxin Zhu Richard de Dear Tsinghua University The University of Sydney China Australia Singapore, 2017 Annex 6 9 Organization Operating Agents:


  1. ANNEX 6 9 Strategy and Practice of Adaptive Therm al Com fort in Low Energy Buildings Yingxin Zhu Richard de Dear Tsinghua University The University of Sydney China Australia Singapore, 2017

  2. Annex 6 9 Organization • Operating Agents: – Yingxin Zhu, Tsinghua University, China – Richard de Dear, The University of Sydney, Australia • Secretary: – Bin Cao, Tsinghua University, China • Subtask Leaders: – ST-A: Edward Arens, UC Berkeley, USA – ST-B: Bjarne Olesen, DTU, Denmark – ST-C: Richard de Dear, The University of Sydney, Australia

  3. Expected outcomes Outcomes Target Audience Database with user interface including information of human Researchers, government 1 thermal reaction together with their agencies behavior and energy consumption Develop a model and criteria for the Researchers, code and application of adaptive thermal standard developers, 2 comfort in built environment policy makers, designers Guidelines for low energy building 3 design based on adaptive thermal Building designers comfort concept Guidelines for personal thermal HVAC engineers, facility 4 comfort systems in low energy managers, HVAC buildings equipment manufacturers

  4. Objectives Fill in the gap of Criteria Application data & knowledge New database with Guideline for low Revised criteria • • • more climate & energy building for current building types design standards Adaptive thermal Guideline for New criteria for • • • comfort model personal thermal mixed-mode with mechanism comfort system buildings Case Study

  5. Technical Approach • Data collection and Subtask A research into models of Model study adaptation • Criteria and guidelines for adaptive comfort and Subtask B Personal Thermal Comfort Criteria & guidelines Systems in standards • Practical learnings from Subtask C exemplary adaptive Case studies buildings, supporting Subtasks A & B

  6. Subtask A: Data collection & m odel Leader: Prof. Edward Arens, UC Berkeley, USA Sub A1: Standardize the description of field study data from various resources and make a uniform data format. Sub A2: Collect existing field Sub A3: Quantification of uncertainty data and establish a in thermal comfort instruments (objective and subjective) worldwide database. Sub A4: Integrating the mechanisms of thermal adaptation and the database to develop the revised gray box adaptive thermal comfort model.

  7. Subtask B: Criteria and guidelines for adaptive com fort and Personal Therm al Com fort System s in standards Leader: Prof. Bjarne Olesen, DTU, Denmark Sub B1: Analyze and improve the adaptive model and criteria for use in existing standards criteria for indoor thermal environment. Sub B2: Provide design guidelines on how to use adaptive comfort for lowering energy in buildings. Sub B3: Provide design criteria and guidelines for Personal Thermal Comfort Systems. Sub B4: Development of an open access code repository for thermal comfort indices.

  8. Subtask C: Case studies - Practical learnings from exem plary adaptive buildings, supporting Subtasks A & B Leader: Prof. Richard de Dear, The University of Sydney, Australia Founder of ASHRAE’s adaptive thermal comfort model/standard Sub C1: Conduct instrumental indoor environment measurements to analyze the performance of target buildings from the view of indoor comfort, occupant behavior, and energy use. Sub C2: Lessons learned and develop recommendations for “adaptive” building design, operation and refurbishment. Sub C3: Collect successful cases to compile a compendium, as an appendix of the guidelines from Subtask B, to help readers to relate the outcomes of this project to their work.

  9. Participants and their intentions in each subtask 36 Institute from 14 countries Country Researcher Institute A1 A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 B4 C1 C2 C3 Richard de 1 Dear The University Australia Jungsoo of Sydney 2 Kim Australia Paul University of 3 Cooper Wollongong British Columbia Canada Rodrigo 4 Institute of Mora Technology Yingxin 5 Tsinghua China Zhu University 6 Bin Cao 7 Liu Yang Xi’an University China Yongchao of Architecture 8 Zhai and Technology Zhaojun Harbin Institute 9 China Wang of Technology South China Yufeng 10 China University of Zhang Technology 11 Hang Yu China Tongji University 12 Xiang Zhou Dalian Lin 13 China University of Duanmu Technology Zhiwei Lian Shanghai 14 China Jiaotong Univ.

  10. Country Researcher Institute A1 A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 B4 C1 C2 C3 Bjarne 15 Olesen Jorn Technical 16 Denmark Toftum University of Denmark Ongun 17 Berk Kazanci Denmark Henrik N. Aalborg 18 Kundsen University Augsburg Germany Runa University of 19 Hellwig Applied Science Marcel 20 Schweiker Karlsruhe Germany Institute of Andreas 21 Technology Wagner Germany Christoph RWTH Aachen 22 van Treeck University Rajan CEPT 23 India Rawal University Rossano University of 24 Italy Albatici Trento Hiroshi 25 Japan Yoshino Tohoku Tomonobu University 26 Japan Goto Shinichi Waseda 27 Japan Tanabe University Ryozo The University 28 Japan Ooka of Tokyo Hom Rijal Tokyo City 29 Japan University

  11. Country Researcher Institute A1 A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 B4 C1 C2 C3 National Institute of Japan Kazuyo Advanced 30 Tsuzuki Industrial Science and Technology Korea Chungyoon Yonsei 31 Chun University Wouter van The 32 Marken Maastricht Nether- Lichtenbelt University lands 33 Lisje Schellen Norwegian Norway Salvatore University of 34 Carlucci Science and Technology Thomas 35 Umea Sweden Olofsson University 36 Bin Yang 37 Despoina Teli Chalmers Univ Sweden ersity of 38 Quan Jin Technology Oxford Michael 39 UK Brookes Humphreys University London 40 UK Fergus Nicol Metropolitan University University David 41 UK College Shipworth London

  12. Country Researcher Institute A1 A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 B4 C1 C2 C3 Stephanie University of 42 UK Gauthier Southampton Dennis Loughborough 43 UK Loveday University Mahroo Loughborough 44 UK Eftekhari University Shen Wei Northumbria 45 UK University USA Edward 46 UC Berkeley Arens 47 USA Hui Zhang UC Berkeley USA Gail 48 UC Berkeley Brager USA Stefano 49 Schiavon UC Berkeley The Catholic USA Hyojin 50 University of Kim America University of USA Joon-Ho 51 Southern Choi California

  13. Tim eline 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Preparation Phase Working Phase (Finished) Reporting Phase The working phase was proposed to extend for 1 year.

  14. Participants at the Open Forum for Annex 69 in Hong Kong, China, July 11th, 2014

  15. Participants at the Open Forum for Annex 69 in May 20th, 2015 in Eindhoven, Netherland

  16. Every half-year experts meetings within our Annex • May, 2015. 1 st experts meeting in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. • 14 participants from 8 countries (China, Denmark, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, UK)

  17. Our participation in the IEA-EBC ExCo meetings June, 2014. 75 th meeting in Germany • – Yingxin introduced the concept proposal. November, 2014. 76 th meeting in Finland • – Yingxin introduced the full proposal and was approved. June, 2015. 77 th meeting in Portugal • – Richard & Bin reported the first half-year progress. November, 2015. 78 th meeting in Korea • – Yingxin reported progress of the whole preparation phase and was approved to start working phase. June, 2016. 79 th meeting in Norway • – Yingxin reported the latest progress in working phase. November, 2016. 80 th meeting in Australia • – Bin went and reported the latest progress in working phase.

  18. Progress in the preparation year • 2 nd preparation phase meeting at Beijing (China), October 19-20, 2015 • 38 participants from 10 countries (Australia, China, Denmark, Germany, Korea, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, UK, USA)

  19. October, 2015. 2 nd experts meeting in Beijing, China. • 38 participants from 10 countries (Australia, China, Denmark, Germany, Korea, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, UK, USA)

  20. April, 2016. 3 rd experts meeting in London, UK. • 39 participants from 13 countries

  21. October, 2016. 4 th experts meeting in Seoul, Korea.

  22. Factsheet Workshops / Open Forums: Participating Countries Hong Kong, China, July 11 th , 2014 Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Tianjin, China, July 13 th , 2015 Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Beijing, China, October 20 th , 2015 Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK, USA Windsor, UK, April 8 th , 2016 Incheon, Korea, October 24 th -25 th , 2016 Nagoya, Japan, October, 2016 Related Events More information Experts Meetings: http://www.annex69.org Eindhoven, the Netherlands, May 20 th , 2015 http://www.iea- Beijing, China, October 19 th -20 th , 2015 ebc.org/projects/ongoing-projects/ebc- London, UK, April 6 th -7 th , 2016 th -28 th , 2016 annex-69

  23. W ebsite www.annex69.org

  24. Thanks for your attention!

Recommend


More recommend