anaee
play

AnaEE A European infrastructure for analysis and experimentation on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 14, 2023 •342 likes •607 views

AnaEE A European infrastructure for analysis and experimentation on ecosystems AnaEE: addressing key scientific & societal challenges Challenges facing Europe and the world The sustainability of agricultural, forested, freshwater and

  1. AnaEE A European infrastructure for analysis and experimentation on ecosystems

  2. AnaEE: addressing key scientific & societal challenges

  3. Challenges facing Europe and the world • The sustainability of agricultural, forested, freshwater and other managed and natural ecosystems is critical for the future of mankind • However, the services provided by these ecosystems are under threat • Climate change • Loss of biodiversity • Land use changes • Disturbance of global C, N and P cycles • We need to understand and forecast how ecosystems will respond to current and future changes

  4. 03/11/2015 4 AnaEE – a response to these challenges Our vision Our strategic objectives • Help scientists and policymakers • Build capacity in ecosystem develop solutions to the science through of the art facilities challenges of food security and • Structure the research community environmental sustainability • Strengthen the European research • Support scientists in analysing, area assessing and forecasting global • Provide access to massive, high- changes like climate change quality environmental data from • Stimulate the growth of a vibrant experimental ecosystem research bioeconomy • Feed into public policy processes • Build permanent and substantial to help mitigate and adapt to links between researchers, change science managers, policy makers, industry and citizens • Provide solutions to the challenges of the bioeconomy

  5. 03/11/2015 5 Our future infrastructure In natura In vitro Modelling Analytical Real-world advice

  6. Links with global networks ANAEE China NEON Brazil PAERIP TERN

  7. Current partners from 11 European countries French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), France Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), UK Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research (Bioforsk), Norway National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), France Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Denmark Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Turkey Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Italy Global Change Research Centre, Czech Academy Of Science (CVGZ), Czech Republic University of Antwerp (UA), Belgium University of Helsinki (UHel), Finland Umea University (UU), Sweden Rothamsted Research (RRes), UK Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Norway INRA Transfert (IT), France Ben Gurion University of the Negev (BGU), Israel

  8. The agenda to build AnaEE Design • 2007-2009 study ESFRI • 2010 Roadmap 2011-2014 Preparatory • 2012-2016 phase Construction • 2016-2018 phase • 2018 Implementation phase onwards

  9. Our Call for Expression of Interest – building AnaEE

  10. 03/11/2015 10 Our Call for Expression of Interest – building AnaEE • Additional sites (not shown on the map) managed by French institutes in: • Brazil • Costa Rica • French Guyana • La Réunion • Thailand

  11. 03/11/2015 11

  12. 03/11/2015 12 zone.no HO 1 HC 2 MED 3 SA 4 NA

  13. 03/11/2015 13 Heat map analysis Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 42 38 38 31 29 11 12 HO 59 59 56 50 44 34 39 HC 43 39 39 32 30 11 13 Elevated HC 67 66 64 55 49 38 46 Climate Subarctic 39 35 35 30 28 10 12 CO2 Subarctic 80 80 75 66 58 46 55 warming Med 44 40 41 34 32 14 15 Med 68 67 65 58 50 39 44 Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 53 61 54 47 61 50 47 HO 38 40 43 40 61 59 57 HC 63 70 62 51 69 58 51 Precipitation HC 36 39 40 37 58 57 55 Hydrological Subarctic 46 52 47 39 51 41 38 change Subarctic 34 38 41 36 57 55 54 change Med 65 75 66 54 73 62 56 Med 38 43 43 39 64 62 60 Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 22 25 23 20 21 15 15 HO 43 37 42 39 41 33 33 HC 23 27 24 21 22 15 15 UV HC 38 33 38 35 38 30 30 Soil Subarctic 21 25 23 19 21 15 15 radiation Subarctic 28 25 28 26 27 21 21 eutrophicatio Med 26 31 28 23 28 19 19 Med 34 31 35 32 34 25 25 Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 14 14 14 14 40 62 65 HO 46 41 41 39 34 18 18 HC 13 13 13 13 35 56 59 Water HC 51 44 45 41 36 19 19 Air Subarctic 11 11 11 11 27 46 49 eutrophication Subarctic 40 37 36 32 30 15 15 pollution Med 11 11 11 11 32 52 55 Med 47 41 41 38 33 18 18 Analysis done on >40 and <40, respectively!

  14. 03/11/2015 14 Heat map analysis Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 38 22 33 33 17 13 15 HO 29 47 35 34 27 35 30 HC 51 30 43 43 23 17 20 Fire HC 30 50 38 37 28 35 30 Soil erosion Subarctic 41 25 36 37 19 16 16 Subarctic 23 35 27 28 21 24 21 Med 75 45 62 64 32 25 28 Med 33 57 43 43 29 36 30 Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 15 23 21 22 11 12 11 HO 44 51 41 30 32 25 23 HC 29 39 38 35 22 25 22 Desertification HC 45 54 44 31 33 26 24 Management Subarctic 11 17 15 16 8 9 8 Subarctic 31 35 30 24 23 13 13 Med 38 54 52 52 31 34 30 Med 39 48 40 29 31 23 21 Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 14 30 21 16 17 17 17 HO 58 26 50 47 54 32 33 HC 14 30 21 16 17 17 17 GMO HC 57 26 50 46 53 32 32 Habitat Subarctic 10 20 14 12 10 11 11 Subarctic 42 20 34 34 38 21 21 fragmentation Med 15 30 22 17 15 16 16 Med 51 25 47 41 47 30 30 Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake Forest Agro Grass Shrub Wetland River Lake HO 46 42 45 40 41 45 45 HO 52 37 63 42 58 55 58 HC 44 41 43 38 40 43 43 Pests and HC 56 39 68 44 63 56 60 Biodiversity Subarctic 43 40 42 38 37 41 41 invasive sp. Subarctic 44 28 50 35 49 44 47 loss Med 49 46 48 41 44 47 48 Med 58 40 70 44 64 58 62

  15. 03/11/2015 15 No. of pressures and ecotypes within each climatic zone • For each climatic zone – how many platforms within each ecotype apply each pressure • Label if heat map value is >40 or <40.

  16. 03/11/2015 16

  17. 03/11/2015 17

  18. 03/11/2015 18

  19. 03/11/2015 19

  20. 03/11/2015 20

  21. 03/11/2015 21 Our Call for Expression of Interest – building AnaEE In natura In vitro Analytical Modelling Total Belgium 2 3 5 Czech Republic 5 1 2 1 9 Denmark 11 3 14 Estonia 6 1 7 Finland 20 10 6 2 38 France (Mainland) 20 17 9 3 49 France (Overseas Territories) 3 3 France (French platforms in third countries) 3 3 Germany 2 2 Israel 2 3 5 Italy 5 2 1 8 Netherlands 1 1 Norway 2 2 4 Poland 11 11 Sweden 4 3 2 9 Turkey UK (England) 1 1 UK (Scotland) 6 6

  22. 03/11/2015 22 Legal, Governance and Funding Issues AnaEE will become an ERIC – creation of legal entity planned for 2018 Supranational governance – hub and three service centres Funding models under discussion Intellectual Property Framework drafted – now has to become a policy ERIC statutes beginning to be drafted Governance for Construction Phase still to be defined National Ministries to be presented with a Letter of Intent to sign

  23. 03/11/2015 23 Where we are now? Strengths Opportunities • Well-defined scientific community • Existing high-level platforms in many countries • Clearly defined need for AnaEE • Member States insist on prioritisation – AnaEE can help • Major core countries strongly support AnaEE identify best platforms in Europe • Structural funds could finance new or upgraded platforms in • Collective approach to grand challenges many parts of Europe • Bridges with other communities • Opportunity to build links with industry and create jobs • AnaEE will help improve cost efficiency: economies of scale SWOT Analysis Weaknesses Threats • Long-term funding needs to be secured, especially in period • Slow progress on building the legal, governance and funding of crisis model could endanger support from policymakers • National viewpoints – some platform owners do not yet • New ESFRI infrastructures: may dilute the landscape understand the value of a European infrastructure • UK EU referendum and other geopolitical issues – major • Risk of gaps in covering all European ecosystem types – this threat to stability of research funding landscape can lead to an incomplete portrait of European ecosystems • Key countries missing

  24. 03/11/2015 24 Next steps Autumn 2015: Submission of Letter of Intent to Ministries Autumn 2015: Outlining of list of qualifying platforms and those that need upgrades, following analysis of Call responses Autumn 2015: I3 call (AnaEE-ExpeER 2) for an integrating activity on experimentation on ecosystems Spring 2016: finalised list of platforms in AnaEE 30 April 2016: end of AnaEE Preparatory Phase 1 May 2016: beginning of AnaEE Construction Phase • This phase is entirely funded by partipating countries and bodies • Governance will focus on continuing work of Preparatory Phase and laying the groundwork for the full implementation of AnaEE 2018-2019: signature and creation of a legal entity for AnaEE

  25. 25 Many thanks for your attention! Find out more www.anaee.com AnaEE Project Office +33 (0)1 76 21 61 98 info@anaee.com

Recommend

More recommend