airs radiance validation airs radiance validation
play

AIRS Radiance Validation AIRS Radiance Validation Hank Revercomb, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AIRS Radiance Validation AIRS Radiance Validation Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson And the Whole S-HIS Team Space Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison 10 March 2006 AIRS Science Team Meeting CalTech


  1. AIRS Radiance Validation AIRS Radiance Validation Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson And the Whole S-HIS Team Space Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison 10 March 2006 AIRS Science Team Meeting CalTech

  2. Calibration Emphasis Make full use of the fundamental advantage of high resolution infrared spectra to provide a new standard of accuracy for weather and climate applications • High spectral resolution does offer inherent advantages for calibration accuracy (Goody and Haskins, 1998) • S-HIS verifies highly accurate AIRS radiometric calibration- better than originally specified • Characterizing the nature of small differences should lead to improvements in remote sensing • The high resolution calibration advantage has also been transferred to lower resolution IR instruments, like MODIS Now concerned with tenths of K, not 1 K! 2 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  3. Topics S-HIS summary   Radiometric Calibration   AIRS Radiance Validation with S-HIS   5 cases cover Tropics to Arctic, Day and Night, Land and Sea (thanks to IPO, DOE, and NASA AURA validation & science support) Artifacts of Individual Spectra   Summary   3 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  4. 1. S-HIS summary 4 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  5. UW Scanning HIS: 1998-Present HIS: High Resolution Interferometer Sounder (1985-1998) CO 2 Characteristics Midwave Spectral Coverage: 3-17 microns CH 4 /N 2 O O H 2 O Spectral Resolution: 0.5 cm -1 3 Longwave Resolving power: 1000-6000 H 2 O Shortwave Footprint Diam: 1.5 km @ 15 km N 2 O Cross-Track Scan: Programmable CO 2 including uplooking zenith view CO Applications:  Radiances for Radiative Transfer  Temp & Water Vapor Retrievals  Cloud Radiative Prop.  Surface Emissivity & T  Trace Gas Retrievals 5 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  6. S-HIS for CRAVE January 2006 NASA WB57 AURA Validation Experiment-Costa Rica S-HIS scans cross- track downward & looks upward Left Wing Pod 6 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  7. S-HIS –Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) Bands near 31 Oct 2004 overpass CO 2 ∼ 5.5 x 16 km O 3 N 2 O CH 4 CO 2 CO N 2 O H 2 O CO 2

  8. Cross-track Mapping Capability: Okavanga Delta Surface Emissivity ( 27 August 2000) T b (980 cm -1 ) T b (980) - T b (1125) +6 -2 Δ T=5 K T b (K) 750 cm -1 1250 cm -1 8 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  9. Uplooking: MPACE Example 10/17/04 with SHIS & AERI-ER Alt (km) Above cloud (S-HIS nadir and zenith views from 22:35 to 22:40) Within cloud (S-HIS nadir and zenith views from 22:55 to 23:00) Below cloud (ground based AERI-ER from 22:35 to 23:00) 9 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  10. S-HIS Spectra, 4.67 µ m CO AVE, 26 October 2004 Apodized Note good uplooking zero

  11. S-HIS Spectra, SW/4.3 µ m CO 2 AVE, 26 October 2004 Apodized Zenith (good zero) non-zero agreement

  12. S-HIS Spectra, 4.73 µ m O 3 AVE, 26 October 2004 Apodized CO 2 O 3

  13. 2. Radiometric Calibration 13 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  14. Scanning-HIS Radiometric Calibration Budget TABB= 227, THBB=310, 11/16/02 Proteus Similar to AERI description in Best, et al., CALCON 2003 3-sigma Tb error mostly < 0.2 K SW SW for Tb >220 K RSS of Errors in MW MW T HBB, T ABB LW LW T Rfl ε HBB, ε ABB + 10% of non-linearity correction 14 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  15. AIRS Radiometric Calibration: A better error estimate is needed Brightness temperature errors for The statement of an AIRS 0.2% radiance errors Radiometric Calibration of are unrealistic in the SW band; <0.2% absolute error in the 0.2 K is entirely different AIRS Technical Fact Sheet* is indicative of the problem The difference between absolute error (3-sigma or at least 2-sigma) and reproducibility or repeatability needs to be clarified *http://www-airs.jpl.nasa.gov/ press/AIRS_tech_factsheet.pdf 15 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  16. The NIST Connection • Comparisons with NIST maintained blackbodies conducted with ground-based AERI. S-HIS employs the same calibration approaches Max Difference < 0.055°C Longwave < 0.035°C Shortwave between 293 & 333 K Miami, 1998 • Direct test of S-HIS planned for 2006 using NIST Transfer Radiometer (TXR) at aircraft flight temperatures 16 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  17. 3. AIRS Radiance Validation with S-HIS 17 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  18. AIRS / S-HIS Comparison Methodology (Obs AIRS -Calc AIRS ) ⊗ SRF SHIS - (Obs SHIS -Calc SHIS ) ⊗ SRF AIRS Spatial colocation is achieved by selecting scenes with low variability and covering the full AIRS FOVs with SHIS observations The double obs-calc method accounts for altitude and view angle differences and differences in instrument lineshapes AIRS Channels with high sensitivity S-HIS above the aircraft altitude are excluded from the final comparisons 18 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  19. Impact of S-HIS PC Filtering and Tilt Correction Impact of PC filtering and Tilt correction on SHIS mean spectrum for 060117 CRAVE case (351 FOVs) Full S-HIS spectral T b (K) coverage & resolution: Mainly noise PC filtering of random noise reduction T b (K) Tilt correction (bias for only PC filtering and tilt correction LW < 650 cm -1 tilt correction) wavenumber 19 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  20. Impact of S-HIS PC Filtering and Tilt Correction Impact of PC filtering and Tilt correction on SHIS mean spectrum for 060117 CRAVE case (351 FOVs) After reducing to AIRS resolution and excluding high altitude channels For final T b (K) comparison conditions: PC filtering of random noise No biases, T b (K) Tilt correction just noise reduction PC filtering and tilt correction wavenumber 20 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  21. ARM-SGP Validation case: 2002.11.16 ARM UAV Campaign, S-HIS on Proteus @ ~14km near ARM SGP CF, 19:24 UTC MODIS 12 µ m brightness temperatures and AIRS FOV locations: Aqua Sub- satellite track Proteus flight track time coincidence (near ARM site) 21 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  22. ARM-SGP Validation case: 2002.11.16 22 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  23. ARM-SGP Validation case: 2002.11.16 SW Modules 23 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  24. Gulf of Mexico Validation case: 2002.11.21 Texas 2002 Aqua Validation Campaign S-HIS on ER-2 @ ~20km over Gulf of Mexico at 19:40 UTC MODIS 12 µ m brightness temperatures and AIRS FOV locations: Sub-satellite track exact ER2 / Aqua time coincidence ER2 Flight track 24 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  25. Gulf of Mexico Validation case: 2002.11.21 25 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  26. Gulf of Mexico Validation case: 2002.11.21 SW Modules 26 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  27. Italy Validation case: 2004.09.07 ADRIEX (EAQUATE) Campaign S-HIS on Proteus @ ~16km over Adriatic Sea 2004.09.08, 01:10 UTC (Nighttime) S-HIS 12 µ m brightness temperatures and AIRS FOV locations: 27 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  28. Italy Validation case: 2004.09.07 28 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  29. Italy Validation case: 2004.09.07 Night Flight Shortwave validation is Excellent 29 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  30. Italy Validation case: 2004.09.07 SW Modules 30 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  31. Arctic Validation case: 2004.10.21 S-HIS 12 µ m brightness temperatures MPACE Campaign and AIRS FOV locations: S-HIS on Proteus @ ~16km over low stratus clouds near Barrow, AK at 22:00 UTC 31 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  32. Arctic Validation case: 2004.10.21 How do we explain these differences? 32 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  33. HNO 3 in S-HIS zenith views HNO 3 above S-HIS explains the differences for M-08, M-04c, M-04d, M03 220 K 200 K HNO 3 Mean S-HIS zenith view 180 K on 17 Oct 2004, 22:02-22:40 UTC from ~12.5 km over Barrow, AK 33 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  34. Arctic Validation case: 2004.10.21 HNO 3 SW Modules 34 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  35. Tropical Validation case: 2006.01.17 CRAVE Campaign, S-HIS on WB-57 at ~17 km over the Caribbean Scanning-HIS 900 cm-1 Tb TES footprints (predicted) 35 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  36. Tropical Validation case: 2006.01.17 36 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  37. Tropical Validation case: 2006.01.17 SW Modules 37 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  38. AIRS-SHIS 2002.11.16 Summary ARM-SGP  Radiance validation is 2002.11.21 remarkably Gulf of Mex good  Includes - Notes Tropical to - Hank 2004.09.07 Arctic atm. Italy  Extends over > 3 years  HNO 3 creates 08, 2004.10.21 Arctic 04c, 04d biases  Small 05=O 3 ?  Small LW 2006.01.17 CO 2 diffs: Tropical above plane contributions? 38 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  39. S-HIS zenith views are very revealing S-HIS zenith view Mean S-HIS zenith view will be used on 17 Oct 2004, 22:02-22:40 UTC from ~12.5 km over Barrow, AK to account for HNO 3 and O 3 to test the O 3 & 15 µ m CO 2 regions 220 K 200 K HNO 3 180 K 100 K 120 K 150 K 39 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  40. AIRS-SHIS Summary: SW (2004.09.07) 1 st Direct SW Radiance Validation Excellent agreement for night-time comparison from Adriex in Italy 40 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

  41. Summary of AIRS/SHIS cases 2002.11.21 Differences and S-HIS 3-sigma calibration uncertainty 41 airs_stm_mar2006_revercomb.ppt

Recommend


More recommend