agri benchmark can bring farm level economics and
play

agri benchmark can bring farm-level economics and sustainability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

agri benchmark can bring farm-level economics and sustainability analysis to GRA Julin Char, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer agri benchmark Network GRA Meeting Julin Char, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer


  1. agri benchmark can bring farm-level economics and sustainability analysis to GRA Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer agri benchmark Network GRA Meeting Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019, Cali

  2. Agenda (1) Efficient and effective GHG mitigation strategies in agriculture (2) What agri benchmark has to offer (3) Highlights from our research (4) Future research Page 2 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  3. Our approach (1) Agricultural is extremely fragmented – GHG mitigation strategies that require intense and close monitoring will fail. (2) Therefore strategies have to create a win-win. (3) Productivity growth is the multiple win-win: Less GHG per unit, higher income, more food, less pressure for LUC. (4) Globally, more productive systems are established. No rocket science is needed. (5) What you need: in-depth understanding of current systems and obstacles for improvements and how to overcome them. Page 3 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  4. agri benchmark – understanding agriculture worldwide Page 4 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  5. We harvest data around the world. 60+ Global Research Partners 10+ Years Annual Conferences 100+ typical beef & sheep farms 100+ typcial crop farms One focus – 6 networks Participating countries 2018 Contacts for further growth Page 5 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  6. agri benchmark typical farm approach Outputs:  Thorough understanding of the economics of the major proportion of crop and livestock production  Access to growers and advisors Page 6 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer agri benchmark and GRA

  7. Major clients and research partners Cooperation with other network activities Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer agri benchmark and GRA

  8. Case study approach to analyse silvo-pastoral systems Institutions participating on this work Institutions that have made possible the case studies agri benchmark Beef and Sheep Network Centre for Research on Sustainable Agricultural Production Systems, CIPAV Page 8 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  9. Areas analysed and steps  Baseline (status quo) and scenarios of silvopastoral systems  Close cooperation with producers and local experts  Analysis of the following areas and elements: - Performance and productivity - Economics - Environment (GHG-emissions, nutrients, soils, water, energy) - Animal welfare - Social impacts  Calculation and aggregation of all elements in one tool Page 9 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  10. 100% 06.02.2019 Page 10 Cost composition by production system 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 0% ID-2 ID-4 ES-430 ES-5500 ES-520 MX-1500 agri benchmark and GRA Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer ZA-75K AR-900 BW-2000 ZA-3000 PE-1700 NA-25K CN-2000 BR-680 AR-630 CN-940 AR-26K CA-28K US-7200 US-75K BR-35 AU-360 BR-240 AU-280 CO-130 UK-80 PY-550 BR-60 AU-150 UY-90 BR-300 UA-275 BR-800 NA-600 AU-65 BR-1750 AU-85 AR-380 IE-40 CO-520 AU-310 AU-450 CO-160 AR-800 BR-500 PY-1400 AU-930 NZ-375 ID-100 SE-230 DE-285 PL-30 CH-55 UK-90 DE-260 AT-120 AT-35 DE-380 PL-20 AT-25F CZ-500 AT-175T DE-280 DE-800 UK-45 RU-640 SE-100 UA-5600 DE-525T FR-70 TN-45 FR-60 FR-200 Animals Feed Labour Land Capital Other KZ-800 MA-280 UK-750 IT-2660T CO-800 IT-910 CN-70 CN-300 CN-150

  11. Results silvopastoral systems Case 1 – BEEF FINISHING FORAGE PRODUCTION Total area: 200 ha. Ton. dry matter/ha % Area under SPS COLOMBIA 700% Region : Cesar 70% Climate condition : Dry tropical reached: 8th year compared to baseline Baseline vs. SPS From degraded soils to intensive ECONOMIC RESULTS LAND PRODUCTIVITY sustainable production Kg. meat/ha Initial investment ENVIRONMENTAL SPS strategy implemented 1,850 IMPACT 450% Intensive SPS USD/Ha. Leucaena + Panicum + Eucalyptus compared to baseline Kg CO 2 per 100 kg LW added Profit (USD/year) Sustainability issue to illustrate 250,000 200,000 Restoring degraded natural ANIMAL WELFARE 150,000 resources 100,000 Feeding 50,000 Housing 0 Emphasis on SDG -50,000 Health -100,000 Base line 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Behaviour year compared to baseline Page 11 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  12. Results silvopastoral systems Case 7 – DAIRY Total area: 50 ha. FORAGE PRODUCTION MEXICO Ton. dry matter/ha % Area under SPS 181% Region : Michoacán 100 % Climate condition : Dry subtropical reached: 5th year Baseline vs. SPS compared to baseline From intensive production system ECONOMIC RESULTS with high dependence on external inputs to intensive sustainable LAND PRODUCTIVITY Initial investment ENVIRONMENTAL production Tons ECMilk/ha USD/Ha. IMPACT SPS strategy implemented 1,274 290% Kg CO 2 / 100 kg ECM Intensive SPS - Leucaena + compared to baseline Guinea 350 Profit (USD/year) 300 250 Sustainability issue to illustrate Feed 160,000 140,000 200 Scaling up Intensive sustainable 120,000 Manure Nox 150 100,000 production 80,000 100 Manure methane 60,000 50 40,000 Emphasis on Enteric 0 fermentation 20,000 SDG 0 Base SPS -20,000 line -40,000 -60,000 Page 12 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer Base line 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  13. Case study results GHG emissons I 1 – BEEF FINISHING 2 – DUAL PURPOSE 3 – Dairy 4 – DAIRY 5 – CATTLE BREEDING COLOMBIA COLOMBIA COLOMBIA COLOMBIA COLOMBIA Valle del Cauca Valle del Cauca Quindío Quindío Cesar Already high milk Increased Already high milk yield in Baseline stocking rate yield in Baseline Change of breed (Lucerna breed) Kg CO 2 per 100 kg LW added Kg CO 2 / 100 kg ECM Kg CO 2 / 100 kg ECM Kg CO 2 / 100 kg ECM Kg CO 2 per 100 kg LW added 200 200 200 Feed Feed 1200 Feed Feed 1000 150 150 Manure Nox 150 Manure Nox 800 Manure Nox Manure Nox 100 100 Manure 100 600 Manure methane Manure methane Manure 400 50 methane 50 Enteric methane 50 Enteric fermentation 200 Enteric Enteric fermentation 0 fermentation 0 fermentation 0 0 Base line SPS Base line SPS Base line SPS Base line SPS Productivity increase mainly through increased stocking rates and not via individual animal performance  Less reduction of GHG emissions on a per kg output basis but less land needed for same production Page 13 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  14. Case study results GHG emissons II 6 – DUAL PURPOSE 7 – DAIRY 8 – BEEF FINISHING 9 – FORESTRY & FIN 10 – BEEF FINISHING COLOMBIA ARGENTINA MEXICO MEXICO ARGENTINA Michoacán Michoacán Misiones Corrientes Caquetá Increased animal Very low milk performance + yield in Baseline stocking rate Change of breed Kg CO 2 / 100 kg ECM Kg CO 2 / 100 kg ECM Kg CO 2 per 100 kg LW added Kg CO 2 per 100 kg LW added Kg CO 2 per 100 kg LW added 1500 350 1400 1000 1500 Feed Feed Feed Feed Feed 300 1200 800 250 1000 Manure Nox Manure Nox 1000 Manure Nox Manure Nox 1000 Manure Nox 600 200 800 Manure 150 Manure Manure 600 Manure 400 methane Manure 500 methane methane 500 100 methane methane 400 Enteric Enteric 200 Enteric 50 fermentation Enteric 200 Enteric fermentation fermentation fermentation 0 0 fermentation 0 0 0 Base line SPS Base line SPS Base line SPS Base line SPS Base line SPS No Baseline figures because there were no cattle in the Baseline Page 14 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

  15. Main conclusions  The case studies provide sound evidence that SPS simultaneously deliver gains in productivity and profitability, environmental improvements, and animal welfare benefits and thereby support a number of SDGs  The same quantity of product can be produced on less land which can be released to native vegetation / carbon sinks. To avoid undesired rebound-effects, good governance, policies and incentives are required  Public- private alliances, driven by strong farmer’s organizations, have proven crucial in overcoming technical barriers  National policies should support SPS adoption with specialized training for extension workers and technicians, dedicated credit lines and payment for environmental services and other incentives Page 15 Julián Chará, Ernesto Reyes, Claus Deblitz, Yelto Zimmer 06.02.2019 agri benchmark and GRA

Recommend


More recommend