agenda item 6
play

Agenda Item 6: Gas ENC Approach Overview Place your chosen image - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agenda Item 6: Gas ENC Approach Overview Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. RfG Workgroup Meeting 5 20 November


  1. Agenda Item 6: Gas ENC Approach Overview Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. RfG Workgroup Meeting 5 20 November 2014 Colin Hamilton

  2. NG NTS Approach for Engagement  Dedicated NG workshops were held to lay out the implications of the 3 rd package and outline code concepts & developments. Led to:  Ofgem/DECC EU Stakeholder Group  Concept of a dedicated JESG type group was considered.  Consensus view was that existing updates within existing Transmission WG were sufficient.  Standing agenda item for the past 3 years 2

  3. NG NTS Approach for Engagement  European WG created January 2014  Separate group required to allow  fullest industry involvement  Consideration of all issues affecting UNC  Held same day as monthly Transmission WG  Additional EU WG meetings now occur for detailed consideration of each Code. 3

  4. EU Updates to GB Stakeholders  Regular updates are provided by NG NTS to GB stakeholders via DECC/OFGEM stakeholder meetings, Transmission/EU Workgroup Updates (monthly), Industry Fora (where requested), NG open meetings (ad hoc), Bilateral meetings, etc.  The updates have covered the following:  Development of the European Framework Guidelines or Code – highlighting emerging concepts, rules, encouraging involvement in and detailing EU engagement opportunities, phase completion dates and implementation dates  National Grid Impact Assessments (IAs) – highlighting areas of change for GB regime  Comitology Updates – highlighting changes made by the EC following discussion with member states  Pre Modification Updates – providing further detail on the changes identified and/or how they maybe implemented  Details on high level implementation roadmap are communicated

  5. Additional support for stakeholders  NG Web page created  Dedicated web page to provide a comprehensive resource for all EU code implementation issues.  Future updates…..  Code mod proposals….

  6. Programme Road Map showing Phased Implementation Notes: 1) Short term UIOLI may not be required for NTS 2) Long term capacity auctions may need to be delivered in conjunction with short term auctions

  7. Coordination with neighbours  In order to facilitate the implementation of the EU regulations on CAM at GB IPs, the Regulators requested that the adjacent TSOs develop a ‘Concept Document’  Concept document aimed to outline the key principles all the TSOs need to adopt in order for the EU Codes to be successfully implemented  Therefore an element of parallel working is required…..  How NRAs coordinate has also to be considered.  This process has facilitated dialogue between connected parties

  8. Approach to UNC Modification Plans for Phase 2  Phase 2 of programme required the implementation of several codes  NG NTS provided initial views on the number and types of Mods required to deliver the phase 2 changes  Stakeholder views were sought on these initial plans  NG NTS considered whether to develop a series of mods or one “super mod”

  9. Approach to UNC Modification Plans for Phase 2  One “super” modification ensures coordinated implementation and coherent legal text change  NG NTS concluded that it was not appropriate to raise one “super” Mod, as this was likely to be very complex and delay timelines  Proposal that it was easier and more flexible to develop several modifications  Requires some degree of parallel working  Risks arise if some changes are approved and others delayed  Legal text must be individually implementable  Industry was asked to respond on this approach

  10. Approach to UNC Modification Plans for Phase 2  Stakeholder feedback supported the multiple modification approach  Each Code Lead was tasked to indicated how best to implement their respective code – whether this be 1 Mod or a Mod per area of change  Stakeholders consulted on approach  Modifications proposed to go to Workgroup for development/discussion with UNC parties and not straight to consultation  Small proposals should take up to 6 months to develop  Larger proposals could take around 6-9 months to develop

  11. Phase 2 UNC Modifications Potential Timescales EU Network Code Area of change Panel Submission Workgroup UNC Development Consultation Gas Balancing (BAL) Information Provision March 2014 2 Months July 2014 Nomination Process at IP’s April 2014 6 - 9 Months Nov 2014 Capacity Allocation CAM / CMP Compliant May 2014 6 - 9 Months Q4 - 2014 (CAM) Capacity Auctions Interoperability & OBAs / allocations August 2014 6 Months Q1 - 2015 Data Exchange (INT) Interconnection Q1 - 2015 3 Months Q2 - 2015 Agreements/Contract Changes (facilitating Modification ) Ancillary Agreements December 2014 3 Months Q2 - 2015 Units (reference conditions) November 2014 3 months Q1 - 2015

Recommend


More recommend