Adaptive consumer-resource models
LIPh lab winter workshop 2018
Leonardo Pacciani-Mori December 16th, 2018
Adaptive consumer-resource models LIPh lab winter workshop 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Adaptive consumer-resource models LIPh lab winter workshop 2018 Leonardo Pacciani-Mori December 16th, 2018 The context of our work 1 of 8 The context of our work Competitive Exclusion Principle (CEP): the number of competing coexisting
Leonardo Pacciani-Mori December 16th, 2018
1 of 8
“Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources.
1 of 8
“Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources. There are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated:
1 of 8
“Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources. There are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated:
1 Bacterial community culture experiments
From Goldford et al. 2018
1 of 8
“Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources. There are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated:
1 Bacterial community culture experiments
From Goldford et al. 2018
2 Direct bacterial competition experiments
From Friedman et al. 2017
1 of 8
2 of 8
Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model.
2 of 8
Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model. species Sm>p . . . species Sp . . . species S2 species S1 resource Rp . . . resource R1 . . . ασi
2 of 8
Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model. species Sm>p . . . species Sn≤p . . . species S2 species S1 resource Rp . . . resource R1 . . . ασi
As it is, the model reproduces the CEP. In order to violate it, very special assumptions or parameter fine-tunings are necessary (Posfai et al. 2017).
2 of 8
3 of 8
In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.
3 of 8
In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.
In many experiments diauxic shifts have been observed (Monod 1949)!
2 4 6 8 10 12 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.50 1.00 Time (hours) Cell concentration (g/l)
Growth of Klebsiella oxytoca on glucose and lactose. Data taken from Kompala et al. 1986, figure 11.
3 of 8
In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.
We have modified MacArthur’s consumer-resource model so that the metabolic strategies evolve over time.
3 of 8
In the literature of consumer-resource models ασi are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time.
We have modified MacArthur’s consumer-resource model so that the metabolic strategies evolve over time.
Adaptive framework: each species changes its metabolic strategies in order to increase its own growth rate; adaptation velocity is measured by a parameter d.
3 of 8
4 of 8
Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally
4 of 8
Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally
1/5) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts:
4 of 8
Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally
1/5) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts:
4 of 8
Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally
1/5) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts:
We can explain the existence of diauxic shifts with a completely general model, neglecting the particular molecular mechanisms of the species’ metabolism.
4 of 8
2/5) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle:
5 of 8
2/5) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle:
50 100 150 200 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6
Fixed metabolic strategies
5 of 8
2/5) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle:
50 100 150 200 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6
Adaptive metabolic strategies
5 of 8
3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:
6 of 8
3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:
100 200 300 400 500 100 10-3 10-6 10-9
Fixed metabolic strategies, τin = τout = 20
6 of 8
3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:
100 200 300 400 500 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6
Adaptive metabolic strategies, τin = τout = 20
6 of 8
3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:
100 200 300 400 500 101 10-1 10-3 10-5 10-7 10-9
Fixed metabolic strategies, τin = 20, τout = 5
6 of 8
3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive ασi leads to more stable communities:
100 200 300 400 500 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6
Adaptive metabolic strategies, τin = 20, τout = 5
6 of 8
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model.
7 of 8
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 4/5) If adaptation is sufficiently slow there can be extinction and the Competitive Exclusion Principle can be recovered:
20 species, 3 resources
7 of 8
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 5/5) If nutrient supply rates change in time, faster adaptation leads to less variable populations:
20 species, 4 resources
7 of 8
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 5/5) If nutrient supply rates change in time, faster adaptation leads to less variable populations:
100 200 300 400 500 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6
7 of 8
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 5/5) If nutrient supply rates change in time, faster adaptation leads to less variable populations:
20 species, 4 resources
7 of 8
Friedman, Jonathan et al. (2017). “Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms”. In: Nature Ecology and Evolution 1.5, pp. 1–7. Goldford, Joshua E. et al. (2018). “Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly”. In: Science 361.6401, pp. 469–474. Kompala, Dhinakar S. et al. (1986). “Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: Experimental evaluation of cybernetic models”. In: Biotechnology and Bioengineering 28.7, pp. 1044–1055. Monod, Jacques (1949). “The Growth of Bacterial Cultures”. In: Annual Review
Posfai, Anna et al. (2017). “Metabolic Trade-Offs Promote Diversity in a Model Ecosystem”. In: Physical Review Letters 118.2, p. 28103.
8 of 8
1 of 4
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model.
1 of 4
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model.
How could d be measured? What biological interpretation can we give it?
1 of 4
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model.
How could d be measured? What biological interpretation can we give it?
I suspect that an interesting biological quantity in this sense could be the lag phase of a microbial community, that precedes exponential growth.
1 of 4
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model.
How could d be measured? What biological interpretation can we give it?
I suspect that an interesting biological quantity in this sense could be the lag phase of a microbial community, that precedes exponential growth.
1 of 4
Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model.
How could d be measured? What biological interpretation can we give it?
I suspect that an interesting biological quantity in this sense could be the lag phase of a microbial community, that precedes exponential growth.
1 of 4
In any microbiology textbook we can find that:
2 of 4
In any microbiology textbook we can find that:
1 the lag phase can last from a few hours to several days 2 of 4
In any microbiology textbook we can find that:
1 the lag phase can last from a few hours to several days 2 during the lag phase bacteria adapt to the environmental conditions
(particularly if they have been incubated in a medium different from the
RNA, enzymes and other molecules are synthesized cells almost don’t divide, but grow in size and prepare for reproduction
2 of 4
In any microbiology textbook we can find that:
1 the lag phase can last from a few hours to several days 2 during the lag phase bacteria adapt to the environmental conditions
(particularly if they have been incubated in a medium different from the
RNA, enzymes and other molecules are synthesized cells almost don’t divide, but grow in size and prepare for reproduction
Can our adaptive consumer-resource model reproduce something similar? And if so, how is the lag phase related to d?
2 of 4
From the thesis of a student of Prof. Squartini:
3 of 4
From the thesis of a student of Prof. Squartini:
Figure: Growth of Escherichia coli in broth, 103 cells/ml
3 of 4
From the thesis of a student of Prof. Squartini:
Figure: Growth of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in broth, 103 cells/ml
3 of 4
From the thesis of a student of Prof. Squartini:
Figure: Growth of Rhizobium leguminosarum in broth, 103 cells/ml
3 of 4
From the thesis of a student of Prof. Squartini:
Figure: Growth of Enterococcus mundtii in broth, 103 cells/ml
3 of 4
From the thesis of a student of Prof. Squartini:
Figure: Growth of Enterococcus mundtii in broth, 103 cells/ml
They have used different mediums for different species!
3 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 1 2 3 4 5
Figure: d = 0.5, resource supplied only initially
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 1 2 3 4 5
Figure: d = 1, resource supplied only initially
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 1 2 3 4 5
Figure: d = 10, resource supplied only initially
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Figure: d = 0.5, resource supply constantly
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 10 20 30 40
Figure: d = 1, resource supply constantly
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 5 10 15 20
Figure: d = 10, resource supply constantly
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 5 10 15 20
Figure: d = 10, resource supply constantly
My hope is to use these observations to design and perform some experiments in order to compare the model directly with data.
4 of 4
Consumer-resource model for one species and one resource:
10 20 30 40 50 5 10 15 20
Figure: d = 10, resource supply constantly
Feel free to share your feedback with me!
4 of 4