a type of generalized factorization on domains
play

A type of generalized factorization on domains -Factorizations R.M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Notation and Definitions Equivalence relations A type of generalized factorization on domains -Factorizations R.M. Ortiz-Albino Conference of rings and factorizations, 2018 R. M. Ortiz-Albino -Factorization Notation and Definitions


  1. Notation and Definitions Equivalence relations A type of generalized factorization on domains τ -Factorizations R.M. Ortiz-Albino Conference of rings and factorizations, 2018 R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  2. Notation and Definitions Equivalence relations Outline Notation and Definitions 1 Definitions Relations Equivalence relations 2 Motivation Some results (Ortiz and Serna) R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  3. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Notation D denotes an integral domain D ♯ is the set of nonzero nonunits elements of D τ denotes a symmetric relation on D ♯ R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  4. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Outline Notation and Definitions 1 Definitions Relations Equivalence relations 2 Motivation Some results (Ortiz and Serna) R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  5. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Definition of a τ -Factorization Definition We say x ∈ D ♯ has a τ -factorization if x = λ x 1 ··· x n where λ is a unit in D and x i τ x j for each i � = j . We say x is a τ -product of x i ∈ D ♯ and each x i is a τ -factor of x (we write x i | τ x ). Vacuously, x = x and x = λ · ( λ − 1 x ) are τ -factorizations, known as the trivial ones. Definition In general, x | τ y (read x τ -divides y ) means y has a τ -factorization with x as a τ -factor. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  6. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Definition We call x ∈ D ♯ a τ -atom, if the only τ -factorizations of x are of the form λ ( λ − 1 x ) (the trivial τ -factorizations ). Example: Irreducible elements are τ -atoms (for any relation τ on D ♯ ). Definition A τ -factorization λ x 1 ··· x n is a τ -atomic factorization if each x i is a τ -atom. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  7. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Definition If you exchange the factorization, irreducible elments and divide operator by τ -factorization, τ -atom and | τ operator in the definitions of GCD domain, UFD, HFD, FFD, BFD and ACCP. We obtain the notions of: τ -GCD domain, τ -UFD, τ -HFD, τ -FFD, τ -BFD, and τ -ACCP. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  8. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Examples Example Let τ D = D ♯ × D ♯ (the greatest relation), then the τ D -factorizations are the usual factorizations. Example Let τ / 0 = ∅ (the trivial), then we have that every element is a τ -atom. So any integral domain is in fact a τ / 0 -UFD. Example Let τ S = S × S , where S ⊂ D ♯ . Hence you can consider S is the set of primes, irreducible, primals, primary elements, rigid elements,... R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  9. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Outline Notation and Definitions 1 Definitions Relations Equivalence relations 2 Motivation Some results (Ortiz and Serna) R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  10. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Types of Relations Definitions and Properties Let x , y , z ∈ D ♯ . Associate We say τ is associate - preserving if preserving x τ y and y ∼ z implies x τ z . Divisive If λ x 1 ··· x n is a τ -fatorization, then Multiplicative x 1 ··· x i − 1 · ( λ x i ) · x i +1 ··· x n is also a τ -factotization. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  11. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Types of Relations Definitions and Properties Let x , y , z ∈ D ♯ . We say τ is divisive if x τ y and z | x implies z τ y . Associate Divisive implies associate-preserving. preserving If τ is divisive, then we can do Divisive τ -refinements. Multiplicative That is, if x 1 ··· x n is a τ -factorization and z 1 ··· z m is a τ -factorization of x i then x 1 ··· x i − 1 · z 1 ··· z m · x i +1 ··· x n is also a τ -factorization. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  12. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Types of Relations Definitions and Properties Let x , y , z ∈ D ♯ . Associate We say τ is multiplicative if x τ y and preserving x τ z implies x τ ( yz ). Divisive If τ is multiplicative, then each Multiplicative nontrivial τ -factorization can be written into a τ -product of length 2 R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  13. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations More Examples Example Let τ ( n ) = { ( a , b ) | a − b ∈ ( n ) } a relation on Z ♯ , for each n ≥ 0. For n = 1, we obtained the usual factorizations. Note that for n ≥ 2, τ ( n ) is never divisive, but it is multiplicative and associate-preserving for n = 2. (Hamon) Z is a τ ( n ) -UFD if and only if n = 0 , 1. (Hamon and Juett) Z is a τ ( n ) -atomic domain if and only if n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 10. (Ortiz) Z is a τ ( n ) -GCD domain if and only if is a τ ( n ) -UFD. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  14. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations More Examples Example Let ∗ be a start-operation on D . Then define ⇒ ( x , y ) ∗ = D , that is, x and y are ∗ -comaximal. x τ ∗ y ⇐ It is both multiplicative and divisive. If ⋆ = d , then a d -factorization is the known comaximal factorization defined by McAdam and Swam. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  15. � � � � � � � � � � � � Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Diagram of Properties (Anderson and Frazier) UFD FFD BFD ACCP atomic ∗ τ -FFD ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ � τ -ACCP � τ -atomic τ -UFD τ -BFD τ -HFD Figure: Diagram of structures and τ -structures, when τ is divisive. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  16. Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Definition of “ ≤ ” Definition We say τ 1 ≤ τ 2 , if τ 1 ⊆ τ 2 as sets. Theorem Let D be an integral domain and τ 1 , τ 2 be two relations on D ♯ . The following are equivalent: τ 1 ≤ τ 2 . For any x , y ∈ D ♯ , x τ 1 y ⇒ x τ 2 y. Any τ 1 -factorization is a τ 2 -factorization. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  17. � � � � � � � � � � � � Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Theorem (Ortiz) τ 2 -UFD τ 2 -FFD τ 2 -BFD τ 2 -ACCP τ 2 -atomic τ 1 -FFD � τ 1 -ACCP � τ 1 -atomic τ 1 -UFD τ 1 -BFD τ 1 -HFD Figure: Properties when τ 1 ⊆ τ 2 both divisive and τ 2 multiplicative R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  18. � � � � � � � � � � � � Notation and Definitions Definitions Equivalence relations Relations Theorem(Juett) τ 2 -UFD τ 2 -FFD τ 2 -BFD τ 2 -ACCP τ 2 -atomic τ 1 -FFD � τ 1 -ACCP � τ 1 -atomic τ 1 -UFD τ 1 -BFD τ 1 -HFD Figure: Properties when τ 1 ⊆ τ 2 , τ 1 divisive and τ 2 refinable and associated-preserving R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  19. Notation and Definitions Motivation Equivalence relations Some results (Ortiz and Serna) Outline Notation and Definitions 1 Definitions Relations Equivalence relations 2 Motivation Some results (Ortiz and Serna) R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  20. Notation and Definitions Motivation Equivalence relations Some results (Ortiz and Serna) Equivalence relations have historical precedent. Equivalence relation are less artificial relations. There is only one divisive equivalence relation τ D . Divisive seems to be more-less understood to be good type of relation. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  21. Notation and Definitions Motivation Equivalence relations Some results (Ortiz and Serna) Outline Notation and Definitions 1 Definitions Relations Equivalence relations 2 Motivation Some results (Ortiz and Serna) R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  22. � � � � � � � � � � Notation and Definitions Motivation Equivalence relations Some results (Ortiz and Serna) Diagram of Properties (Ortiz and Serna) � FFD UFD BFD ACCP atomic ∗ τ -FFD ∗ ∗ ∗ � τ -ACCP � τ -atomic τ -UFD τ -BFD τ -HFD Figure: In this case τ is an associated-preserving multiplicative equivalence relation. R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

  23. Notation and Definitions Motivation Equivalence relations Some results (Ortiz and Serna) Associated-preserving clousure of an equivalence relation Definition Let τ be an equivalence relation on D ♯ . The associated-preserving clousure of τ is denoted by τ ′ , which is the intersection of all associated-preserving equivalence relations on D ♯ containing τ . Theorem Suppose τ (is unital) has the following property: for any x , y ∈ D ♯ and λ ∈ U ( D ) , if x τ y, then ( λ x ) τ ( λ y ) . Then τ ′ = { ( µ 1 x , µ 2 y ) | ( x , y ) ∈ τ and µ 1 , µ 2 ∈ U ( D ) } R. M. Ortiz-Albino τ -Factorization

Recommend


More recommend