a projective fra ss e presentation of the menger curve
play

A projective Fra ss e presentation of the Menger curve - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A projective Fra ss e presentation of the Menger curve Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos, joint with S.Solecki UIUC 6th Cornell Conference on Analysis, Probability, and Mathematical Physics on Fractals Table of Contents The Menger curve


  1. A projective Fra¨ ıss´ e presentation of the Menger curve Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos, joint with S.Solecki UIUC 6th Cornell Conference on Analysis, Probability, and Mathematical Physics on Fractals

  2. Table of Contents The Menger curve The Fra¨ ıss´ e method A projective Fra¨ ıss´ e presentation of the Menger curve

  3. The Menger curve M

  4. The Menger curve M Are they homeomorphic?

  5. A Canonical model of M The definition/construction of such model should:

  6. A Canonical model of M The definition/construction of such model should: • reflect the essential combinatorics of the topology of M ;

  7. A Canonical model of M The definition/construction of such model should: • reflect the essential combinatorics of the topology of M ; Theorem (Characterization, Bestvina (see also Anderson)) M is the unique path-connected, locally path-connected, one dimensional, compact space with the disjoint-arcs property.

  8. A Canonical model of M The definition/construction of such model should: • reflect the essential combinatorics of the topology of M ; Theorem (Characterization, Bestvina (see also Anderson)) M is the unique path-connected, locally path-connected, one dimensional, compact space with the disjoint-arcs property. • make various important properties of M easily accessible.

  9. A Canonical model of M The definition/construction of such model should: • reflect the essential combinatorics of the topology of M ; Theorem (Characterization, Bestvina (see also Anderson)) M is the unique path-connected, locally path-connected, one dimensional, compact space with the disjoint-arcs property. • make various important properties of M easily accessible. Theorem (Homogeneity property, Anderson) Let a 1 , . . . , a n and b 1 , . . . , b n be two sequences of pairwise distinct points of M . Then there is a self-homeomomorphism φ ∈ Homeo ( M ) with φ ( a 1 ) = b 1 , . . . , φ ( a n ) = b n .

  10. Table of Contents The Menger curve The Fra¨ ıss´ e method A projective Fra¨ ıss´ e presentation of the Menger curve

  11. Some model theoretic background

  12. Some model theoretic background ( Q , ≤ ) The random graph ( G , R ) The random graph on Graphs p ( N ), where 0 < p < 1.

  13. Some model theoretic background ( Q , ≤ ) The random graph ( G , R ) The random graph on Graphs p ( N ), where 0 < p < 1. K LO K Graphs finite linear orders finite graphs with embeddings with embeddings

  14. Some model theoretic background ( Q , ≤ ) The random graph ( G , R ) The random graph on Graphs p ( N ), where 0 < p < 1. K LO K Graphs finite linear orders finite graphs with embeddings with embeddings Fra¨ ıss´ e observed that if a class of finite structures K satisfies certain properties (we say K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class) then there is a unique countable structure N that is saturated with configurations coming from K . This structure N is called the Fra¨ ıss´ e limit of K .

  15. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory

  16. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. K

  17. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K

  18. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class,

  19. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B A C

  20. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B D A C

  21. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B D A C We can form a “generic” sequence:

  22. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B D A C We can form a “generic” sequence: . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m

  23. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B D A C We can form a “generic” sequence: B . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m

  24. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B D A C We can form a “generic” sequence: B . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n

  25. Fra¨ ıss´ e theory Start with a class of finite structures and embeddings. Close under countable direct limits. K ω K If K is a Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B D A C We can form a “generic” sequence: B . . . . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n M

  26. Projective Fra¨ ıss´ e theory (Irwin, Solecki) Start with a class of finite structures and epimorphisms. Close under inverse limits limits of countable length. K ω K If K is a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e class, in particular if: B D A C We can form a “generic” inverse sequence: B . . . . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n M

  27. Table of Contents The Menger curve The Fra¨ ıss´ e method A projective Fra¨ ıss´ e presentation of the Menger curve

  28. ❆ ❇ ❆ ❇ ❆ ❆ ❇ ❇ ❇ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ The class K of connected (reflexive) graphs

  29. ❇ ❆ ❇ ❆ ❆ ❇ ❇ ❇ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ The class K of connected (reflexive) graphs A graph ❆ = ( A , R ) is a set A together with a subset R of A × A , with: ◮ R ( a , a ′ ) = ⇒ R ( a ′ , a ), i.e. R is symmetric; ◮ R ( a , a ) always holds, i.e R is reflexive.

  30. ❇ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ The class K of connected (reflexive) graphs A graph ❆ = ( A , R ) is a set A together with a subset R of A × A , with: ◮ R ( a , a ′ ) = ⇒ R ( a ′ , a ), i.e. R is symmetric; ◮ R ( a , a ) always holds, i.e R is reflexive. An epimorphism f : ❇ → ❆ is a map f : B → A , with: ◮ f is surjective; ◮ R ( b , b ′ ) in ❇ implies R ( f ( b ) , f ( b ′ )) in ❆ , i.e. f is a homomorphism; ◮ if R ( a , a ′ ) in ❆ , then there is b , b ′ in ❇ with a ′ = f ( b ) , a = f ( b ′ ), and R ( b , b ′ ) in ❇ .

  31. The class K of connected (reflexive) graphs A graph ❆ = ( A , R ) is a set A together with a subset R of A × A , with: ◮ R ( a , a ′ ) = ⇒ R ( a ′ , a ), i.e. R is symmetric; ◮ R ( a , a ) always holds, i.e R is reflexive. An epimorphism f : ❇ → ❆ is a map f : B → A , with: ◮ f is surjective; ◮ R ( b , b ′ ) in ❇ implies R ( f ( b ) , f ( b ′ )) in ❆ , i.e. f is a homomorphism; ◮ if R ( a , a ′ ) in ❆ , then there is b , b ′ in ❇ with a ′ = f ( b ) , a = f ( b ′ ), and R ( b , b ′ ) in ❇ . Definition Let K be the collection of all finite, connected graphs together with all connected epimorpisms between them. An epimorphism f : ❇ → ❆ is connected, if for every connected subgraph ❆ 0 of ❆ we have that f − 1 ( ❆ 0 ) is connected.

  32. The class K of connected (reflexive) graphs Theorem (P., Solecki) K is a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e class.

  33. The class K of connected (reflexive) graphs Theorem (P., Solecki) K is a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e class. B D A C

  34. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M .

  35. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M . . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m

  36. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M . B . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m

  37. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M . B . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n

  38. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M . B . . . . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n M

  39. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M . B . . . . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n M • M is a 0-dimensional, compact, metrizable space. • The relation R on M is a compact graph relation and each a ∈ M has at most one R -neighbor.

  40. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M . B . . . . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n M • M is a 0-dimensional, compact, metrizable space. • The relation R on M is a compact graph relation and each a ∈ M has at most one R -neighbor. We call M the pre-Menger space...

  41. e limit of K The projective Fra¨ ıss´ In particular, K has a projective Fra¨ ıss´ e limit M . B . . . . . . . . . A 0 A 1 A m A n M • M is a 0-dimensional, compact, metrizable space. • The relation R on M is a compact graph relation and each a ∈ M has at most one R -neighbor. We call M the pre-Menger space... Theorem (P., Solecki) The Menger space M is the quotient M / R of M under the equivalence relation R.

  42. ❆ ❆ ❇ ❆ ❇ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ Homogeneity of M and M

Recommend


More recommend