a multidisciplinary approach to investigating foodborne
play

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigating Foodborne Illness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigating Foodborne Illness Outbreaks June 26, 2019 Overview Seattle-King Countys Approach to Foodborne Illness Investigation Q&A Session Housekeeping Items Throughout the presentation,


  1. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Investigating Foodborne Illness Outbreaks June 26, 2019

  2. Overview • Seattle-King County’s Approach to Foodborne Illness Investigation • Q&A Session

  3. Housekeeping Items Throughout the presentation, please use the Q&A box to ask questions and the chat box to share your experiences. The facilitator will pose your questions to the presenters.

  4. Recordingg A link to the recorded webinar will be emailed to all participants. This recording and past food safety sharing sessions can also be found the NACCHO website: https://www.naccho.org/programs/envir onmental-health/hazards/food-safety/

  5. FOODBORNE ILLNESS OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION OVERVIEW PUBLIC HEALTH – SEATTLE & KING COUNTY FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM June 26, 2019 NACCHO Sharing Session Doug Dyer, MS, RS Elysia Gonzales, RN, MPH

  6. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON

  7. SEATTLE

  8. STAFF – BY THE NUMBERS Environmental Health Food Program: 65 staff Communicable Disease Epidemiology: 40 staff Communications: 8 staff

  9. PREVIOUS SYSTEM C C E E O O E E P P M M H H I I M M S S

  10. TEAM APPROACH

  11. FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT) EH Members in Training EH Food EH Program Experienced Leads Members

  12. FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT) Back-up to Responsibilities experienced members EH Members in Training: Provide 7 staff technical advice and support EH Food Partner with EH restaurant Program Experienced investigator in Leads: Members: the field 12 staff 10 staff

  13. FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT) EH Members in Training: 7 staff Epi Food Program EH Experienced Leads: Members: 12 staff 10 staff

  14. FOODBORNE ILLNESS INVESTIGATION TEAM (FIIT) Comms Foodborne Lead Roles Lead Epi Foodborne EH Members Liaison Lead in Training Senior Foodborne Technical Lead EH Food EH Program Experienced Leads Members

  15. WHY HAVE A FIIT?  Small group with expertise  Increases investigation consistency & effectiveness  Clear roles/responsibilities  FIIT members are:  Capable to perform many roles as needed  Ready to deploy  Mentors

  16. OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION PROCESS

  17. INVESTIGATION PROCESS Reports Plan Investigation received Approach request Team Field Team prep call investigation field call Team Public Follow-up After disclosure disclosure steps action meeting

  18. 1. RECEIVE REPORTS Epi Salmonella

  19. 2. PLAN APPROACH EH Lab Comms Epi

  20. 2. TEAM PREP Fie ield in ld investig igatio ion t team am EH Restaurant EH FIIT Investigator Investigator Comms Epi Investigator (as needed)

  21. 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS  Planning checklist  Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)

  22. 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS  Planning checklist  Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)  Organism-specific resource guide  Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens

  23. ORGANISM-SPECIFIC RESOURCE GUIDE

  24. 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS  Planning checklist  Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)  Organism-specific resource guide  Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens  Resources for operators  Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms

  25. VOMITING AND DIARRHEA CLEANUP

  26. 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS  Planning checklist  Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)  Organism-specific resource guide  Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens  Resources for operators  Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms  Employee illness screening forms Self-report form in multiple languages 

  27. 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS  Planning checklist  Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)  Organism-specific resource guide  Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens  Resources for operators  Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms  Employee illness screening forms Self-report form in multiple languages   Environmental Assessment (EA) Form WA’s modified version of the CDC NEARS form 

  28. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM

  29. 2. TOOLKIT ESSENTIALS  Planning checklist  Guides prep for field investigation (before, during, after)  Organism-specific resource guide  Guide to tailor investigation into CF’s for typical foodborne pathogens  Resources for operators  Includes chlorine concentrations for noro; FDA illness policy forms  Employee illness screening forms Self-report form in multiple languages   Environmental Assessment (EA) Form WA’s modified version of the CDC NEARS form   Sampling kits  Specimen kits and cooler for use if indicated

  30. 3. FIELD INVESTIGATION REQUEST Epi EH Submits standardized request form

  31. INVESTIGATION REQUEST FORM

  32. 4. TEAM PREP CALL Epi EH Field team Epi included EH Restaurant EH FIIT Investigator Investigator Investigator

  33. 5. FIELD INVESTIGATION SAM & ELLA'S DINER

  34. 5. FIELD INVESTIGATION ROLES EPI EH FIIT EH RESTAURANT INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATOR • Screens staff • Conducts routine • Explains process for illness inspection, with to person in • Observational focus on charge at data contributing restaurant • Assists EH factors for • NEARS form data investigators Salmonella • Diffuses tension • Collects samples (if indicated)

  35. 6. TEAM FIELD CALL Field investigation team EH / Epi leads EH Restaurant EH FIIT Investigator Investigator  Review field findings  Answer questions from Epi Investigator restaurant management  Make decisions on immediate interventions  Discuss sample collection

  36. 7. TEAM DISCLOSURE MEETING EH + Epi + Comms Review:  Findings from Epi, EH, and Lab  Strength of evidence  Interventions and remaining steps  Need for disclosure  Need for blog

  37. 8. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE www.kingcounty.gov/outbreak

  38. 8. PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS FOR TRANSPARENCY Health officials, who investigated the outbreak, did not inform the public. "I find that completely, unequivocally wrong," said Bill Marler, a food safety litigator in Seattle. "They have a responsibility to the public."

  39. 8. WHICH OUTBREAKS TO DISCLOSE? Investigation led by King County, and cluster was: CONFIRM RMED: FBD outbreak with lab evidence confirming the outbreak etiology PROBA BABL BLE: FBD outbreak with observational evidence and contributing factors without lab evidence SUSPEC PECT [ [po possibl ssible] e]: Group of cases linked by time or place without strong evidence linking to a common food

  40. 8. TIMING OF DISCLOSURE Disclose while investigation is ongoing if:  Risk to the public still exists  Public can take action to protect their health  Severe outcomes seen  Case finding is needed  Need to prevent or interrupt misinformation  High profile concerns (media or political)  Novel vehicle identified Otherwise, disclose once investigation is complete

  41. 9. FOLLOW-UP STEPS Follow-up site visit(s) by EH Work with WA DOH Lab on testing specimens Work with local, state, and federal partners Update public disclosure with final outcomes Complete report forms (NEARS/NORS)

  42. 10. AFTER ACTION REVIEW What was What actually supposed to happened? happen? What can be What worked & improved next what was time? challenging?

  43. BENEFITS OF TEAM APPROACH Many perspectives Increased cultural Delineates roles competency Increases trust Builds expertise More effective & efficient

  44. CHALLENGES OF TEAM APPROACH Filling absences Maintaining experience Too many cooks in the kitchen Every investigation Balancing thoroughness is unique with efficiency

  45. LESSONS LEARNED  Hold after action debriefs  Maintain equal partnerships, not hierarchical  Quarterly FIIT meetings and frequent trainings  Table top exercises  Case reviews  Disclosure process is time intensive but effective  PH leads by speaking first, reducing misinformation  Decreased media calls

  46. LESSONS LEARNED  Identify points-of-contact for each program  Include Epi investigator in EH field visits  Share data across programs  Team approach requires broad engagement  Make time for process improvement activities  Develop consistent tools internally and externally

  47. THANK YOU! Elysi sia G Gonza nzales, s, Epidemiology Foodborne Disease Program Manager elysia.gonzales@kingcounty.gov Dou Doug Dy Dyer, Environmental Health Senior Technical Lead ddyer@kingcounty.gov Ki S Ki Str traughn, ghn, Environmental Health Services Supervisor kstraughn@kingcounty.gov Kat ate C Col ole, Communications Specialist kacole@kingcounty.gov

Recommend


More recommend