a l l i e s fo r e ffi c i e n cy s ai f s al e m c amp u
play

A L L I E S FO R E FFI C I E N CY S AI F S AL E M C AMP U S P R E - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A L L I E S FO R E FFI C I E N CY S AI F S AL E M C AMP U S P R E S E N TAT I O N AN D B UI L D I N G T O UR AUGUST 7 2018 AGENDA n ENERGY TRUST OF OREGON INTRODUCTION n SAIF PROJECT INTRODUCTION n DESIGN APPROACH n PATH TO NET ZERO n


  1. A L L I E S FO R E FFI C I E N CY S AI F S AL E M C AMP U S P R E S E N TAT I O N AN D B UI L D I N G T O UR AUGUST 7 2018

  2. AGENDA n ENERGY TRUST OF OREGON INTRODUCTION n SAIF PROJECT INTRODUCTION n DESIGN APPROACH n PATH TO NET ZERO n MEP SYSTEMS n BUILDING TOURS AFTER PRESENTATION 2

  3. About us ABOUT - ENERGY TRUST OF OREGON Independent nonprofit organization dedicated to Independent nonprofit organization dedicated to Independent nonprofit organization dedicated to helping utility customers invest in and benefit from helping utility customers invest in and benefit from helping utility customers invest in and benefit from energy efficiency and clean, renewable power. energy efficiency and clean, renewable power. energy efficiency and clean, renewable power. We provide: We provide: We provide: Information • Information Information Technical services • Technical services Technical services • Engineering studies Engineering studies Engineering studies • Cash incentives Cash incentives Cash incentives • Contractor connections Contractor connections Contractor connections 3

  4. Energy Trust New Buildings ENERGY TRUST - NEW BUILDINGS New construction • New construction • Major renovations • Tenant build-out • Additions or expansions renovations Tenant build-out Additions or expansions 4

  5. TRAINING & EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES • Allies for Efficiency • Building Energy Simulation Forum • High Performance Design Trainings • Special Events • Event partnerships and sponsorships FREE trainings for industry audiences statewide. Webinar options and continuing education credits often available. www. energytrust.org/commercial/commercial-training- events/ 5

  6. UPCOMING TRAININGS Date August 8 – Portland 2017 Net Zero Fellowship Research Brightwork’s Approaching Net Zero for Today’s Buildings August 15 - Portland Building Energy Simulation Forum OHSU Knight Cancer Research Building Energy Modeling 6

  7. QUESTIONS Questions? For more information about: • Upcoming trainings • Education opportunities • Becoming an Energy Trust New Buildings Ally Contact Kriya Kaping Contact: kriya.kaping@clearesult.com Kriya Kaping, Market Outreach Specialist, New Buildings kriya.kaping@clearesult.com 7

  8. PRESENTERS ELIN SHEPARD Outreach Manager | Energy Trust of Oregon MARSHA MALONSON Project Manager | SAIF MARIAH KIERSEY Project Manager | Ankrom Moisan Architects BRIAN GOLDCRUMP Energy Analyst | Glumac 8

  9. SAIF PROJECT INTRODUCTION n Remodel existing building to recruit new hires and allow for expansion n Hired DAYCPM and AMA n Studied entire Salem Campus n Updates to parkway building, Church Street and the Church Street building n Lease Crutcher Lewis integrated early into team 9

  10. SUSTAINABILITY TASKFORCE MUST HAVE SHOULD HAVE NICE TO HAVE n Healthy & safe design and n Energy efficiency 40% better n Net zero energy construction than code n Renewable energy production n LEED Silver equivalent n Energy efficiency 70% better n Visual displays of current than CBECS (Commercial Bldg n Oregon REACH code energy efficiency Energy Consumption Survey) n Exceed Oregon’s energy code n Rainwater management n Sensitive land protection – requirements by at least 20 n Heat island reduction protect or restore habitat percent (Oregon SEED) n Light pollution reduction n Bicycle facilities n Energy Star appliances, unless n Advanced water metering n Advanced commissioning other system outperforms n Advanced energy metering n Enhanced IAQ performance n Enhanced refrigerant n Cooling tower water use management n Enhanced refrigerant n Recycle or reuse demolition management material n Quality views n Use of regional products n Certified wood n Efficient interior lighting n Daylighting n Thermal comfort 10

  11. TEAM STRUCTURE COmmissioning envelope D M consultant S T O L Y S E E S R SAIF BOARD OF T W I E F M S R H I S S O R N E H DIRECTORS Audio Visual SAIF/ MARSHA D W S N MALONSON PM SAIF MEP/ Steering T C N L E Low voltage I committee and /Lighting coo/BILL BARR C G A L U M DAY CPM/ lease RICARDO crutcher BECERRIL/ lewis STRUCTURAL owner's rep C R O O Engineering N T T C R A K A G mariah CIVIL kiersey Engineering PROJECT H R MANAGER / P H ARCHITECT N A A N S K R I O O M I N T E R I O R S M Landscape Will michael tuan Q. sabine H R H P Grimm great luu o’halloran URBAN LEAD INTERIOR PRINCIPAL-IN- A N N A A DESIGNER ARCHITECT N DESIGNER A CHARGE N N A A N N K N A A K S K S R I S I S R O K R O O I O M I O M O M R O M M M O M Kitchen M Y H A A D L L I Roberta Cole Connie ramin Pennington cabler Hotovec rezvani Acoustical INTERIOR ARCHITECT ARCHITECT DESIGNER A N A N A N N A DESIGNER engineer A A A A 11 N N N N S S S K K K K S I I I I R O R O R O R O O M O M O M O M M M M M S A S

  12. MEP TEAM STRUCTURE PEDER TRELSTAD PROJECT MANAGER / ARCHITECT G C A L U M ROGER MARIO Heather ARNOLD LAMORTICELLA hardie-hill ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL PLUMBING G C G C C G L A L A A U M U M L U M Dustin Brian Jesse stallings goldcrump smith LOW VOLTAGE ENERGY LIGHTING C C G G G C A A A L L L U M U M U M 12

  13. PROJECT APPROACH n Design Process n Data Informed Design n Quality Control n Full Team Meetings n Milestone Meetings for sign off n Contractor Integration COLLABORATIVE DESIGN APPROACH DISCOVERY ANALYSIS PROGRAMMING DESIGN REFINEMENT IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW MEETING S T A S S S S S K T A T A T A T A T A E H K E K E K E PRESENTATION K E PRESENTATION K E H H H H H O O O O O O L D L L L L L D D D D D E E E E E E R R R R R R S S S S S S CHARETTE SESSION MEETING REVIEW KICK-OFF FINAL DOCUMENTS CONCEPT STAKEHOLDER STAKEHOLDER STAKEHOLDER VISIONING M M M M M M A A A A A A T E T E T E T E T E T E N N N N N N G G G G G G E S I E S I E S I E S I E S I E S I D D D D D D Tasks include development scenario Tasks include concept development, Tasks include concept refinement, Tasks include finalizing concept master Tasks include site visits, initial meetings with Tasks include site analysis, site investigation, coordination of systems and stakeholders, data review inventory and land mapping , opportunity, constraints, program refinement, systems design, plan, develop management plan, planning, programming, zoning in-take sessions analyze naturaL/cultural resources programming, phasing, recommendations land-use planning, visual assessment recommendations., identify next steps strategies, short/long term goals, adjacencies 13

  14. DATA INFORMED DESIGN STRATEGIES All items below require the full team to be on board and together: Owner, Design Team and Contractor n Inside Out, Outside In n Technical Advocate Form (TA) n Setting Design Goals w/ Team n In-House Integrated Enclosure n Surveys n Lean Process n Guiding Principles n Clash Detection n Observation of Users and Site n Laser Scanning n User Group Meetings n Reviews prior to set issuance n Programming Analysis n LEED Strategies n Internal Space Diagrams n Contractor Pricing from the beginning n Change Management n Contractor and Design Team meetings n Consultant Integration n Pricing of options 14

  15. PROJECT APPROACH Zooming Out 15

  16. PROJECT APPROACH Programming Analysis n Asking the Right Questions n Visioning Sessions n User Group Input n Anything is Possibl e Future - Phase 2 Future - Phase 3 39 sq. ft. 11.3 sq. ft. Workstation Evolution 12’-6” 6’-3” 3’-3” 8’-6” 8’-6” 6’-6” Executive Offjce Private Offjce Manager Station Standard Station Hotelling/Guest Station 180 sq. ft. minimum 130 sq. ft. minimum 106 sq. ft. 53 sq. ft. 21 sq. ft.   Workstations begin to influence overall building design   Examples from Daimler North American Headquarters project   16  

  17. DESIGN Design Ideas n Employee entry n Not next to trash compactor n Universal design n Varying collaboration types n Connectivity n Security 17

  18. VISIONING STUDY Interior images selected during survey SAIF -survey results top three - interiors 1 2 3 overall pluses overall minuses 1. Open 1. Industrial 2. Natural 2. Cold 3. Light 3. No privacy 4. Comfortable 4. Too open 5. Private 5. Too modern 6. Relaxing 6. Uncomfortable 7. Collaboration 7. Wasted space 8. Inviting 8. Too open to elements 9. Welcoming 9. Too “jetsons” 10. Warm 10. Not inviting 18

  19. PROJECT APPROACH Inside Out Outside In ARCH Inside-Out Informants Outside-in Informants • Office Layout • Site / Neighborhood • Core / Shell • Climate • Air • Approach / Access • Light • Views • Orientation • Amenity • Amenity • City Assets • Identity • Zoning • Perspective Shift 19

  20. INSIDE OUT OUTSIDE IN COMMUNITY SOCIAL OUTSIDE QUIET FAMILY ROOM BACK YARD LIBRARY KITCHEN modern light comfortable inviting natural productive private welcoming greenery collaboration relaxing warm 20

  21. INSIDE OUT OUTSIDE IN COMFORTABLE quiet calming tranquil PRIVATE RELAXING cozy COMMUNITY QUIET SOCIAL OUTSIDE FAMILY ROOM LIBRARY KITCHEN BACK YARD 21

Recommend


More recommend