a cutaneous facial mass identified as the
play

A Cutaneous Facial Mass Identified as the New Entity Mammary Analogue - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Cutaneous Facial Mass Identified as the New Entity Mammary Analogue Secretory Carcinoma of Probable Salivary Gland Origin Scott W. Binder, MD Professor and Senior Vice Chair Chief, Dermatopathology Geffen/UCLA Healthcare Case


  1. A Cutaneous Facial Mass Identified as the New Entity ‘Mammary Analogue Secretory Carcinoma’ of Probable Salivary Gland Origin Scott W. Binder, MD Professor and Senior Vice Chair Chief, Dermatopathology Geffen/UCLA Healthcare

  2. Case Presentation A 50 year-old man presents with a 7 mm erythematous papule on the right face • Developed over a few months • Asymptomatic • No history of prior neoplasms including salivary gland tumors • Lesion located just lateral to nose

  3. Clinical Impression “Rule out bug bite”

  4. Histopathology 4

  5. Histopathology 5

  6. Histopathology 6

  7. Histopathology 7

  8. Histopathology 8

  9. Histopathology 9

  10. Differential Diagnoses • Acinic cell carcinoma • Apocrine or eccrine sweat duct tumor • Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma • Benign oncocytic neoplasms • Mucoepidermoid carcinoma • Metastasis from a visceral primary

  11. Outside Special Stains S-100 EMA CK 7 CK 20 p63 Mucicarmine

  12. Additional Immunohistochemistry Mammaglobin CEA CK 5/6 Thyroglobin TTF-1 PSA Ki67

  13. Diagnosis • Mammary Analogue Secretory Carcinoma (MASC) • ? Primary salivary gland origin v. primary cutaneous tumor • Rule out metastasis

  14. Background • MASC first described in 2010 by Skalova et al. • Morphologic overlap between acinic cell carcinoma and secretory carcinoma of the breast • Tumors affect all ages (range 14-77), slightly male-predominant

  15. MASC • Presents as slowly growing mass, often near parotid gland • No evidence of primary cutaneous origin, as of yet • Most treated with non-radical excision +/-radiotherapy • Cases of lymph node metastases, local recurrences, low mortality Chiosea et al, Histopathology 2012

  16. Histology of MASC • Unencapsulated, lobulated • Intercalated duct cells in tubular, microcystic, papillary patterns • L umina with ample “bubbly” secretions ( mucicarmine +) • Absence of serous acinar granules

  17. Immunohistochemistry of MASC Staining • Usually positive • S100 • CK7 • Vimentin • Often positive • EMA • GCDFP • Mammaglobin • Negative • CK5/6, CK20 • P63, TTF-1, PSA, Thyroglobulin 17

  18. Immunohistochemistry of most apocrine tumors • Cytokeratin 5/6+, p63+ • S100+/-, cytokeratin 7+ • Mammaglobin +/-, EMA+ (patchy, highlights ducts) • CEA+, GCDFP 15+/- 18

  19. Key Differential Diagnoses of MASC Diagnosis Key Cytomorphologic Ancillary Testing Features Features Benign oncocytic Lack vacuolated cytoplasm, S-100 negative, anti- neoplasms (oncocytoma, more cohesive mitochondrial antibody oncocytic cystadenoma, positive Warthin tumor) Acinic cell carcinoma Usually lacks mucin PAS-D+ cytoplasmic granules, DOG-1 strongly positive, mammaglobin negative Mucoepidermoid Epidermoid differentiation p63 positive, S100 negative, carcinoma MAML2 translocation Metastatic carcinoma High grade nuclei, many Staining variable show necrosis 19

  20. Fusion Gene • Almost all MASC had fusion gene ETV6-NTRK3 Normal Cells No ETV6 Split Signals Abnormal ETV6 split signals

  21. Clinical Course • Patient had neoplasm completely excised by the ENT service • Work-up for primary underlying neoplasm is on-going and imaging studies are negative for primary salivary gland tumor

  22. Summary • MASC is likely an under-recognized diagnosis and can present a diagnostic pitfall, easily being confused with a primary adnexal tumor given that it is a newly-described entity and too bland to be immediately interpreted as a metastasis or recurrence. The origin of this particular tumor is still uncertain, as no salivary gland primary has been detected in this patient. • Immunohistochemical stains for S100, CK7, p63, cytokeratin 5/6, mammaglobin, and identification of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene would be required to completely evaluate tumors of this type • ? Primary cutaneous/subcutis MASC v. unusual primary apocrine sweat duct tumor (solid and cystic hidradenoma)

  23. Cutaneous Metastases v. Adnexal Primary Carcinoma: A Practical Approach 23

  24. Cutaneous Metastases • Clinical Considerations • Mean age at presentation is 62 • Most common primary tumors • Lung 30% • Melanoma 18% • G.I. Tract 14% • Breast 5% • Lymphoma 5% • In approximately 10% of cases, the primary is unknown • Histologic Types • Adenocarcinoma 40% • Melanoma 15% • Squamous carcinoma 15% • Other 30% 24

  25. Cutaneous Metastases v. Primary Adnexal Carcinoma • Histopathologic Characteristics of Metastases • Tumor growth often concentrated in the deep dermis - “ bottom heavy ” appearance • Sparing of epidermis common • Ulceration and pagetoid spread rarely noted (colonic and melanoma) • Tumor necrosis sometimes present • Lymph/vascular invasion sometimes observed • High grade tumor cells with numerous mitoses 25

  26. Cutaneous Metastases v. Primary Adnexal Carcinoma • Immunohistochemical Considerations • Battery may include • Cytokeratin 7 • Cytokeratin 20 • S-100 • MART-1/Melan-A/MITF or SOX-10 • PSA • TTF-1 • ER/PR/Her-2-neu • CDX-2 • Cytokeratin 5/6, p63* 26

  27. Cutaneous Metastases v. Primary Adnexal Carcinoma • Recent studies have shown that CK5/6 and p63 may help distinguish primary adnexal neoplasms (CK5/6+/p63+) from most metastatic carcinomas (CK5/6-/p63-) • P63 especially helpful • D2-40 not been especially helpful in my lab 27

  28. 46 yo F with history of breast cancer x7 years 28

  29. Histopathology 29

  30. Histopathology 30

  31. Histopathology 31

  32. IHC Results CK7 32

  33. IHC Results ER 33

  34. IHC Results HER2/neu 34

  35. IHC Results CK5/6 35

  36. IHC Results P63 36

  37. 68 yo M w paranasal mass present x 1 yr – rapid recent growth 37

  38. Histopathology 38

  39. Histopathology 39

  40. Histopathology 40

  41. IHC Results CK5/6 41

  42. IHC Results p63 42

  43. Cutaneous Metastases v. Primary Adnexal Carcinoma • Impossible to reliably distinguish primary or metastatic eccrine/apocrine tumors from cutaneous metastases of breast carcinomas, especially apocrine or mucinous types • Immunohistochemical Staining of Breast v. Metastases • ER (estrogen receptor) • PR (progesterone receptor) • GCDFP-15 (gross cystic disease fluid protein) • CEA • Her-2-neu • None of these may reliably separate primary sweat duct tumors from breast metastases 43

  44. Cutaneous Metastases v. Primary Adnexal Carcinoma • Aberrant staining of metastases • Technical • Antibody • Technique • Therapeutic effect – chemo and/or radiation/immune modulators • Tumor metastases may have different immuno phenotypes than the primary • Tumors don’t always read the books • Another tumor/primary is responsible for the aberrant staining 44

  45. Cutaneous Metastases v. Primary Adnexal Carcinoma • Take Home • H&E considerations and clinical information most important for diagnostic purposes • Immunohistochemistry stains are useful ancillary studies, especially cytokeratin 5/6 and p63 but be careful as these may lead you astray • Be sure to eliminate the possibility of a basal cell carcinoma demonstrating unusual growth patterns • Always think of the possibility of a primary adnexal CA in the appropriate clinical and histologic context • Occasional inability to differentiate a primary adnexal CA from a visceral metastasis 45

  46. References • Saliva A, Vanecek T, Sima R, Laco J, Weinreb I, Perez-Ordonez B, Starek I, Geierova M, Simpson RH, Passador-Santos F, Ryska A, Leivo I, Kinkor Z, Michal M. Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands, containing the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene: a hitherto undescribed salivary gland tumor entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 May;34(5):599-608. • Griffith C, Seethala R, Chiosea SI. Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma: a new twist to the diagnostic dilemma of zymogen granule poor acinic cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2011 Jul;459(1):117-8. • Fehr A, Löning T, Stenman G. Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of the salivary glands with ETV6- NTRK3 gene fusion. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Oct;35(10):1600-2. • Rastatter JC, Jatana KR, Jennings LJ, Melin-Aldana H. Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of the parotid gland in a pediatric patient. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Mar;146(3):514-5. • Connor A, Perez-Ordoñez B, Shago M, Skálová A, Weinreb I. Mammary analog secretory carcinoma of salivary gland origin with the ETV6 gene rearrangement by FISH: expanded morphologic and immunohistochemical spectrum of a recently described entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jan;36(1):27-34. • Chiosea SI, Griffith C, Assaad A, Seethala RR. Clinicopathological characterization of mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands. Histopathology. 2012 Sep;61(3):387-94. • Griffith CC, Stelow EB, Saqi A, Khalbuss WE, Schneider F, Chiosea SI, Seethala RR. The cytological features of mammary analogue secretory carcinoma: a series of 6 molecularly confirmed cases. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013 May;121(5):234-41. • Bishop JA. Unmasking MASC: bringing to light the unique morphologic, immunohistochemical and genetic features of the newly recognized mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands. Head Neck Pathol. 2013 Mar;7(1):35-9.

Recommend


More recommend