2018 all payer total cost of care
play

2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results & APM Technical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results & APM Technical Changes Update Sarah Lindberg Michele Degree February 26, 2020 2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results 2 Conclusions This is the first year for Medicare and Commercial


  1. 2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results & APM Technical Changes Update Sarah Lindberg Michele Degree February 26, 2020

  2. 2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results 2

  3. Conclusions • This is the first year for Medicare and Commercial Payers and year two for Medicaid. • Though the Medicaid ACO program has two years of experience, the network changed substantially between performance years. • Future analysis will include risk adjustments and other meaningful factors both in and out of the ACO, which will allow for more comparative analysis. • In 2018, very little spending was under the control of the ACO, these results are only intended to reflect the State’s performance. 3

  4. Two Main Lenses for Analysis RE RESI SIDE DENT NT PROVIDER VIDER Where people live Where care was delivered $6.0 billion in 2017* $6.2 billion in 2017* E.g. All-Payer Total Cost of Care: E.g. Vermont Hospital Budgets: * Estimates from 2017 Expenditure Analysis, https://gmcboard.vermont.gov/sites/gmcb/files/2017_Expenditure_Analysis_with_projections_March_27_2019.pdf

  5. Current Measure: APM TCOC Growth The All-Payer ACO Model (APM) has two financial targets related to growth in the Total Cost of Care (TCOC). They measure how much the TCOC is changing on a per person basis for people who live in Vermont, reflecting a resid siden ent-based based analy alysis sis. 1. 1. All-Payer r TCOC: Growth from 2017 to 2022 is targeted at 3.5%. 2. 2. Medicar dicare TCOC: Growth from 2017 to 2022 is targeted to be 0.2 percentage points less than expected national growth.

  6. APM All-Payer TCOC vs. Hospital Budgets All Pa Payer er Hospital tal TCOC Budge gets ts Vermont ont Residents ents $ for care delivered in HSA ✓ ✓ $ for care delivered outside of HSA x ✓ Non-Verm ermon ont t Residents ents $ for care delivered in HSA x ✓ $ for care delivered outside of HSA x x 6

  7. APM All-Payer TCOC vs. Hospital Budgets ALL-PAYER YER TCOC OC HOSP SPIT ITAL AL BUDGETS GETS • Estimated, future spending for • Actual expenditures for a an unknown population fixed population • A broad set of financial • A subset of medical information related to the expenditures: delivery of care in addition to the operation of medical • Medical claims facilities, e.g.: • Medicaid’s All -Inclusive • Maintenance and Population Based Payment equipment • Blueprint and SASH payments • Salaries and fringe • Shared savings and losses • Bad debt and free care • Provider tax • Drugs and supplies 7

  8. APM All-Payer TCOC vs. Insurance Rate Review All Pa Payer er Rate TCOC Review Vermont ont Residents ents $ for care delivered in HSA ✓ ✓ $ for care delivered outside of HSA ✓ ✓ Non-Verm ermon ont t Residents ents $ for care delivered in HSA x ✓ $ for care delivered outside of HSA x ✓ 8

  9. APM All-Payer TCOC vs. Insurance Rate Review ALL-PAYER YER TCOC OC RATE E REVIEW VIEW • Estimated, future spending • Actual expenditures for a for an unknown population – fixed population based on actuals from two • A subset of medical years prior expenditures: • Premiums cover the risk • Medical claims associated with medical and pharmaceutical claims, as • Medicaid’s All -Inclusive well as: Population Based Payment • Administrative costs • Blueprint and SASH payments • Contributions to reserves • Assessments and fees • Shared savings and losses 9

  10. APM All-Payer TCOC vs. ACO Budgets All Pa Payer er ACO TCOC Budge gets ts Vermont ont Residents ents $ for care delivered in HSA ✓ ✓ $ for care delivered outside of HSA ✓ ✓ Non-Verm ermon ont t Residents ents $ for care delivered in HSA x ✓ $ for care delivered outside of HSA x ✓ 10

  11. APM All-Payer TCOC vs. ACO Budgets ALL-PAYER YER TCOC OC ACO BUDGE GETS TS • Actual expenditures for a • Estimated, future spending fixed population for a fixed population • A subset of medical • ACO Budgets include TCOC expenditures: targets, as defined by each participating payer, as well • Medical claims as operational expenses and • Medicaid’s All -Inclusive investments in population Population Based Payment health programs. • Blueprint and SASH payments • Shared savings and losses 11

  12. Comparing Expenditure Measures (in millions) Total VT Resident Spend APM TCOC OCVT TCOC (2017 EA) (2018) (2018 Actual) 100% Proportion of total expenditures In 2018, the APM TCOC OC on behalf of Vermont residents represented about half 75% (48% 48%) of the total spending on behalf of VT residents. $6,029 50% In 2018, OCVT’s TCOC represented 10% of the 25% $2,870 total spending on behalf of Vermont residents. $609 0%

  13. TODAY’S RESULTS: All-Payer TCOC Growth, Model Year 1 How did the per person TCOC change from 2017 to 2018 for Vermont residents? 𝑄𝑓𝑠 𝑞𝑓𝑠𝑡𝑝𝑜 𝑈𝐷𝑃𝐷 𝑗𝑜 2018 𝑄𝑓𝑠 𝑞𝑓𝑠𝑡𝑝𝑜 𝑈𝐷𝑃𝐷 𝑗𝑜 2017 = $521.25 $500.88 = 4.1% While the growth in PY1 exceeded the target of 3.5% the State is considered “on track” if average growth over the 5 performance years is 4.3% or less.

  14. All-Payer TCOC by Payer Type Pa Payer r Type 2017 2018 Growth wth Al All-Pa Payer er $500. 0.88 88 $521.25 25 4.1% 1% Medicare $841.32 $878.05 4.4% Commercial $461.99 $468.97 1.5% Medicaid* $258.96 $275.79 6.5% Non-ACO Medicaid* $252.23 $275.00 9.0% ACO Medicaid* $288.50 $280.52 -2.8% *Excludes permissible price increases

  15. Share of TCOC vs Population by Payer Type (2018) TCOC TCOC Member Mont Memb er Months hs ($2,870,039,124) ($2,870,039,124 (5,506,068) (5,506,068) 60% Medicar icare 50% 45% 45% Commer mmercial cial Commer mmercial cial 44% 40% 40% 40% Medicai icaid 30% 29% 29% Medicar icare 20% 27% Medica icaid id 15% 10% 0% 15

  16. All-Payer TCOC: Medicare Benef efici iciar ary Group 2017 2018 18 Growth th End Stage Renal Disease $5,751.07 $5,752.53 0.0% (ESRD) All Vermont Medicare Non-ESRD $837.41 $875.02 4.5% TOTAL $841. 1.32 32 $878.05 05 4.4% End Stage Renal Disease $5,465.22 (ESRD) ACO Only Non-ESRD $957.81 TOTAL AL $961. 1.07 16

  17. All-Payer TCOC: Commercial* Benef efici iciar ary Group 2017 2018 18 Growth th Fully Insured $452.23 $451.48 -0.2% Self-Insured $454.93 $470.44 3.4% All Vermont Commercial Medicare Advantage $619.39 $571.59 -7.7% TOTAL AL $461. 1.99 99 $468.97 1. 1.5% Fully Insured $517.27 Self-Insured $405.91 ACO Only Medicare Advantage TOTAL AL $485.37 *Analysis limited to insurer data available in VHCURES 17

  18. All-Payer TCOC: Medicaid Benef efici iciary Group 2017 2018 18 Growth th ACO $288.50 $283.95 -1.5% Unadjusted Non-ACO $252.23 $281.11 11.5% TOTAL AL $258.96 96 $281. 1.93 93 8.9% “Hold Harmless” ACO $288.50 $280.52 -2.8% Adjusted for Non-ACO $252.23 $275.00 9.0% Permissible Price TOTAL AL $258.96 96 $275.79 79 6.5% Increases 18

  19. All-Payer Model Agreement Updates 19

  20. Process GMCB, AHS, and CMMI have been working to update three key areas in the quality framework of the Agreement: 1. HEDIS Measures 2. MSSP Measures 3. Timelines Of no note, , these ese chang nges es remain main techn hnic ical al in n na nature ure, , none ne of of these se are changes ges to the measur sures es themselv mselves es 20

  21. Suggested Technical Changes 1. HEDIS Measures: Removes percentile references. Model after multi-payer, ACO-aligned 30-day follow-up after discharge from the ED (2 measures) and set a PY5 target for those measures listed. • Access to Care Milestone – Medicaid adolescents with well- care visits (all VT Medicaid) • Proposal: 53% • Suicide and Substance Use Disorder Target – initiation of alcohol or other drug dependence treatment (ACO-aligned) • Proposal: 40.8% • Suicide and Substance Use Disorder Target – engagement of alcohol or other drug dependence treatment (ACO- aligned) • Proposal: 14.6% • Chronic Conditions Milestone – medication management for people with asthma (all VT residents) • Proposal: 65%, codify use of 50% compliance rate

  22. Suggested Technical Changes 2. MSSP Measures: Update benchmarks to appropriate decile range (70 th – 80 th ). • Access to Care Target – Getting timely care, appointments and information: ACO CAHPS (Medicare ACO-aligned) • Chronic Conditions Target – composite of diabetes, hypertension and multiple chronic conditions (Medicare ACO-aligned) • Proposal: disaggregate in line with MSSP, produce three rates (this change brings the total number of measures to 22). • Chronic Conditions Milestone – tobacco use assessment and cessation intervention (ACO-aligned) • Proposal: update language to correctly identify rate is aggregated by participating payer programs. • Suicide Milestone – screening for clinical depression and follow-up plan (ACO-aligned) Proposal: update language to correctly identify rate is aggregated by • participating payer programs.

Recommend


More recommend