2 24 2012
play

2/24/2012 Future Local MCH Funding Webinar Overview Presentation - PDF document

2/24/2012 Future Local MCH Funding Webinar Overview Presentation and Discussion: Part II February 2012 Funding sources Reasons for changes CO L O R A D O M A T E R N A L A N D CH I L D H E A L T H ( M CH ) P R O G R A M P R E V E


  1. 2/24/2012 Future Local MCH Funding Webinar Overview Presentation and Discussion: Part II February 2012  Funding sources  Reasons for changes CO L O R A D O M A T E R N A L A N D CH I L D H E A L T H ( M CH ) P R O G R A M P R E V E N T I O N S E R V I CE S D I V I S I O N  Stakeholder engagement process  New funding model components Webinar Overview Source and Amount of MCH Funding MCH: Title V Federal Block Grant, MCH Bureau (MCHB) at the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration,  Funding model results U.S. DHHS.  Administration, Support, and Contract Expectations , pp , p  Colorado for FY12 will receive $7 178 335  Colorado for FY12 will receive $7,178,335 .  Agencies receiving <$50,000 annually  Agencies receiving >$50,000 annually  Total MCH block grant dollars to LPHAs in FY12 for prenatal, child, adolescent programs and services = $2,117,988  Ongoing efforts and next steps  Total MCH block grant dollars to LPHAs in FY12 for HCP programs and services = $1,393,522 Source and Amount of HCP Funding Purpose of MCH/ HCP Block Grant Funding HCP: Colorado State General Fund  State and local MCH is accountable to MCHB at U.S. DHHS for Title V funding.  CDPHE will receive $2,526,083 in FY12 for serving CSHCN  Total HCP General Fund dollars to LPHAs in FY12 for HCP  Required by funding to address 18 national and 10 = $1,815,262 state performance measures, and 6 national outcome measures. Total to LPHAs for FY12 for HCP = $3,20 8 ,78 4  State performance measures linked to nine MCH priorities and overlapping CDPHE winnable battles GRAND TOTAL to LPHAs for FY12 for MCH/ HCP program s and services=$5,326,772 1

  2. 2/24/2012 Purpose of HCP State General Fund Reasons for Change Colorado Revised Statue 25-1.5-101: To operate and  Need to align local MCH funding with the maintain a program for children with disabilities to restructuring of local public health agencies in provide and expedite provision of health care Colorado, as a result of 2008 Public Health Act; services to children who have congenital birth defects or who are the victims of burns or trauma or defects or who are the victims of burns or trauma or  Critical assessment of HCP program in 2010-11 – children who have acquired disabilities; need to align funding with new care coordination model and local systems-building. Reasons for Change Stakeholder Engagement  Need to align local MCH funding with:  October webinars: 112 LPHA staff participated; 20 staff responded to the follow-up survey.  Nine new MCH priorities  Six regional meetings: 65 local public health staff  CDPHE Winnable Battles CDPHE Wi bl B l participated representing 33 out of the 55 LPHAs in CO.  Community priorities Stakeholder Engagement New Funding Model Basics  Two LPHA workgroups (8-12 participants each) met  All 55 LPHAs will receive funding according to the from December/ January through February to same formula for MCH/ HCP funding. provide input regarding program operations and contract expectations.  MCH/ HCP funding will be distributed using the funding formula of MCH population x poverty --  Many individual meetings and conversations along the same formula federal Maternal and Child Health the way! Bureau uses to allocate states’ MCH and HCP funding. 2

  3. 2/24/2012 New Funding Model Basics Results  The same amount of funding is being allocated to LPHAs,  Agencies receive notification one year prior to yet distributed differently. implementation of funding changes.  43 out of the 55 LPHAs throughout Colorado will receive  A three-year mitigation plan will be implemented to an increase in MCH/ HCP funding. / g support agencies through the transition from FY13 - FY16 .  2 agencies will receive less than 2% decrease in funding. These agencies are Denver and Jefferson County who receive significant funding levels.  Funding for specialty clinics will be allocated to clinic host sites in addition to the funding formula.  10 agencies will receive significant decreases in funding. Results Regional Partnerships  HCP Regional Offices will no longer be funded for FY13.  LPHAs are encouraged to work together regionally. Funding being redistributed across all counties with MCH funding formula.  State MCH/ HCP and OPP will support regional partnerships as requested.  State HCP nursing consultants will provide  State HCP nursing consultants will provide TA/ consultation and training for LPHA.  Partnership examples may include service provision, shared community health assessment, or combined funding. LPHAs Receiving Less Than $50,000 Annually Questions? A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A N D CO N T R A C T E X P E CT A T I O N S 3

  4. 2/24/2012 Administration Overlap of Contracts – July 1 – Sept. 30  LPHAs still accountable for FY12 HCP and MCH contracts; Will receive FY12 funding as planned through  Administered by the Office of Planning and Sept. 30, 2012; Partnership (OPP);  MCH/ HCP SOW will be built into per capita contract / p p beginning July 1, but agency will begin new SOW  Distributed through LPHAs’ per capita contracts; identified in OPP contract October 1;  A scope of work specific to MCH and HCP work and  New funding levels will begin October 1 st and continue through June 30 th (9 months of FY13 funding); funding will be included in the per capita contract. Contract Expectations Support Agencies Receiving $1500-$15,000 Annually  The state MCH/ HCP Programs will partner with OPP to  Must choose from the following options: provide technical assistance and consultation related to MCH/ HCP.  MCH priorities by implementing part or all of a state-  LPHAs will receive support from OPP Nursing Consultants developed local action plan related to an MCH priority;  Program expertise also available from MCH state staff  HCP Model of Care Coordination with data entry in including HCP Nurse Consultants and the MCH CYSHCN Data System; Implementation Teams;  Community health assessment process and public health  MCH Conference to learn about state and national improvement planning process; MCH/ HCP, MCH data, and local evidence-based strategies. Contract Expectations Agencies Receiving $15,001-$50,000 Annually Questions?  Required: HCP Care Coordination Model including data entry into CYSHCN Data System  In addition, agencies may choose from the following: I dditi i h f th f ll i  MCH priorities by implementing part or all of a state- developed local action plan related to an MCH priority;  Community health assessment process and public health improvement planning process; 4

  5. 2/24/2012 Administration and Support LPHAs Receiving More Than $50,000 Annually  Administered by the state MCH Program in partnership with the HCP Program; A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A N D CO N T R A C T  Agencies will participate in the MCH planning, E X P E CT A T I O N S implementation and reporting process;  Support provided by MCH Generalist Consultants; Support Contract Expectations  Program expertise is also available from state staff  Required to implement the HCP Care Coordination including: HCP Nurse Consultants; the PSD Model including data entry in the CYSHCN Data Epidemiology, Planning and Evaluation Branch; and the System; MCH Implementation Teams.  Required to implement the local action plan related  Will develop one-year plans (with longer term goals/ obj.) for the next three years as agencies’ MCH/ HCP funding to the medical home priority levels transition;  LPHAs determine percent of funding allocated to  Required to attend MCH conference on March 7,8, and 9 th to learn about local action plans, contract HCP care coordination and medical home priority expectations, and much more! meet these requirements. Contract Expectations Illustration of FY13 LPHA MCH/ HCP Funding  Percent of total MCH/ HCP funds must focus on FY13 LPHA MCH/ HCP implementing MCH-priority action plans, including the Funding Expectations medical home priority. HCP Care Coordination Other MCH Priorities and Action Plans Includes costs  FY13 - At least 10 % of total MCH/ HCP funds associated with 10% Medical Home Priority One exam ple of what HCP care l f h coordination costs may be.  FY14 – At least 20 % of total MCH/ HCP funds 40% The parameters of the "Other" work are similar to MCH funding parameters now.  FY15 and FY16 - At least 30 % of total MCH/ HCP HCP Specialty Efforts are determined by Clinic Funding LPHA. 50%  These percentages will be reassessed prior to the start of each fiscal year. 5

Recommend


More recommend