10-Year Facility Master Plan August 1, 2011
Introduction � Approach � Recommendations � Ongoing process 2
Approach � Begins with Phase II � Based on anticipated SPLOST funding � Scores will be fluid � Combined score and prioritization process 3
Combined Score Combined Score Equation Example – Brockett Elementary School 0.50(Physical 0.40(Educational 0.10(Technology + + = Combined Score Condition) Adequacy) Readiness) 0.50(49.90) + 0.40(72.21) + 0.10(76.70) + 61.50 24.95 + 28.88 + 7.67 + 61.50 Combined Score Examples School Name Condition Suitability Technology Combined Score SCORE WEIGHTING FORMULA 50% 40% 10% Brockett ES 49.90 72.21 76.70 61.50 Smoke Rise ES 37.10 63.40 76.70 51.60 Stephenson MS 81.51 92.29 75.00 85.17 4 Stone Mountain HS 66.83 57.74 74.20 63.93
Priority Cut Points Phase Years SPLOST Combined Score Guidelines < 54 Replacement FY 2013 – 2017 IV 2 54 – 60 Limited Renovation 54 – 60 Replacement School FY 2018 – 2022 V 3 60 – 65 Renovations FY 2023+ VI+ 4 65 – 70 Renovations 5
Phase II (2013-17) Recommendations 1. Replace nine schools: A. CHAMBLEE HIGH SCHOOL F. PEACHCREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL B. MCNAIR MIDDLE SCHOOL G. PLEASANTDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C. AUSTIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL H. ROCKBRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL D. FERNBANK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I. SMOKE RISE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL E. GRESHAM PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2. Renovate and provide additions to Redan High School and Henderson Middle School. 6
Phase II (2013-17) Recommendations (con’t) 3. Consolidate DeKalb School of the Arts and DeKalb Elementary School of the Arts 4. Limited renovations to critically deficient systems at schools with scores between 54-60 5. Capital Renewal Program for the preservation of assets includes: • ROOFING • HVAC • ELECTRICAL • PLUMBING • ENVIRONMENTAL 7
Phase II (2013-17) Recommendations (con’t) 6. Annual evaluation of enrollment data to determine redistricting and consolidation needs 7. Develop district-wide plans for: HIGH ACHIEVERS AND OTHER MAGNETS, EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION INCLUDING ARTS SPECIAL EDUCATION ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION 8. Reevaluation of combined scores in 2016 8
Phase III (2018-22) & IV (2023 +) Recommendations � Renovate and/or replace schools based on combined scores � Add capacity to facilities based on projected enrollment � Relocate programs based on district-wide plan 9
Phase III (2018-22) & IV (2023 +) Recommendations (con’t) � Continue Capital Renewal Program for the preservation of assets to include: • ROOFING • HVAC • ELECTRICAL • PLUMBING • ENVIRONMENTAL � Continue annual evaluation of enrollment data to determine redistricting and consolidation needs 10
Sample Master Plan Recommendations (Super Cluster 3) REPLACE WITH Anticipated Funding: NEW SCHOOL CLOSED PROGRAM NEW RENOVATE ADDITION Phase 2: SPLOST IV (FY 2013-2017) COMBINED CURRENT IN AREA SCHOOLS RELOCATION FACILITY Phase 3: SPLOST V (FY 2018-2022) SCORE UTILIZATION Phase 4: SPLOST VI & Beyond (FY 2023+) PHASE Super Cluster 3 – Elementary Schools Eldridge Miller ES* 57.88 97% 2 Hambrick ES* 68.52 81% 2 Marbut ES 85.53 92% Pine Ridge ES 60.99 61% 3 Princeton ES 94.42 96% Rock Chapel ES 75.89 62% Rockbridge ES 49.22 80% 2 Shadow Rock ES 85.24 92% Stone Mill ES* 71.77 90% 2 Stone Mountain ES* 50.61 95% 2 Wynbrooke ES 94.29 98% SC3 Elementary School Average 72.21 86% Super Cluster 3 – Middle Schools Champion MS** 57.52 92% 3 2 Redan MS 92.13 78% Stephenson MS 85.17 80% Stone Mountain MS 93.62 82% SC3 Middle School Average 82.11 82% Super Cluster 3 – High Schools Redan HS 57.99 114% 2 2 Stephenson HS 75.45 100% Stone Mountain HS 63.93 99% 3 SC3 High School Average 65.79 104% 11 Super Cluster 3 Average 73.34 89% *Phasing and extent of renovations dependent upon redistricting of new schools. ** Limited renovation to critical systems.
Conclusion � Ongoing process � Questions 12 12
Recommend
More recommend
